Abstract
This theoretical introduction presents the core assumptions of the dependency research program (DRP), the main classic works in this tradition, and its differences. It also defines the two main concepts that cross through the entire volume: “situations” and “mechanisms” of dependency. Situations of dependency refer to concrete empirical manifestations of dependent capitalism (e.g. dependency within the EU; dependency within China–Latin America relations). Mechanisms of dependency refer to the specific causal mechanisms through which dependency comes about. Finally, the introduction provides an overview of the different chapters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We will mainly make reference to and take inspiration from the Latin American dependentistas, who were among the most read authors in this tradition. Other strands emerged in different places of the globe, for example, the works of Samir Amin in Africa, Atul Kohli in India, and Giovanni Arrighi in Europe.
- 2.
Another problem of dos Santos’ definition is that reduces the global political economy (or global capitalism) to world trade (dos Santos, 1970: 231).
- 3.
Kvangraven (2020: 6) who has a slightly softer inclusion/exclusion criteria includes Raúl Prebisch and Hans Singer as part of the research program.
- 4.
Interview with Peter Evans in Kvangraven et al., (2017).
- 5.
Bresser-Pereira (2011) identifies yet a third variant putting emphasis on the possibility of a national-popular development within dependent structures, as opposed to the associated-development variant of Cardoso and colleagues negating the possibility of a progressive national bourgeoisie, and pointing at the role of foreign capital to think possibilities of dependent development.
- 6.
References
Agbebi, M., & Virtanen, P. (2017). Dependency theory–A conceptual lens to understand China’s presence in Africa? Forum for Development Studies, 44(3), 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2017.1281161.
Antunes de Oliveira, F. (2019). The rise of the Latin American far-right explained: Dependency theory meets uneven and combined development. Globalizations, 16(7), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1567977.
Bambirra, V. (1974). El Capitalismo Dependiente Latinoamericano. Siglo XXI Editores.
Baran, P., & Sweezy, P. (1968). Monopoly capital. Montly Review Press.
Becker, J. (2013). The periphery in the present international crisis: Uneven development, uneven impact and different responses. Spectrum: Journal of Global Studies 5(1): 21–41.
Beigel, F. (2006). Vida, muerte y resurrección de las “ teorías de la dependencia “. In CLACSO (Ed.), Crítica y Teoría en el Pensamiento Social Latinoamericano (pp. 287–326). CLACSO.
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. T. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bresser-Pereira, L. C. (2011). From old to new developmentalism in Latin America. In José Antonio Ocampo and Jaime Ros (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Latin American economics (pp. 108–129). London and New York: Oxford University Press.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’ s periphery. Cornell University Press.
Bollen, K. (1983). World system position, dependency, and democracy: The cross-national evidence. American Sociological Review, 48(4), 468–479.
Boswell, T., & Dixon, W. J. (1990). Dependency and rebellion: A cross-national analysis. American Sociological Review, 55(4), 540–559.
Bruszt, L., Greskovits, B. (2009) Transnationalization, social integration, and capitalist diversity in the East and the South. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(4), 411–434.
Bruszt, L., & Langbein, J. (2020). Manufacturing development: How transnational market integration shapes opportunities and capacities for development in Europe’s three peripheries: Introduction to the special issue. Review of International Political Economy, 27(5), 996–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1726790.
Cardoso, F. H. (1972a). ¿Teoría de la dependencia o análisis concretos de dependencia? In Estado y Sociedad (pp. 133–150). Ediciones Nueva Visión.
Cardoso, F. H. (1972b). Imperialismo y Dependencia en América Latina. In Estado y Sociedad en América Latina (pp. 199–227). Ediciones Nueva Visión.
Cardoso, F. H. (1977a). The consumption of dependency theory in the United States. Latin American Research Review, 12(3), 7–24.
Cardoso, F. H. (197b7). Current theses on Latin American development and dependency : a critique. Boletín de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe (CEDLA), 22(22), 53–64.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1969). Dependencia y Desarrollo en América Latina. Ensayo de Interpretación Sociológica. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979). Dependency and development in Latin America. University of California Press.
CEPAL. (1950). The economic development of Latin America. New York: United Nations. Department of Economic Affairs.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1975). The effects of international economic dependence on development and inequality: A corss-national study. American Sociological Review, 40(6), 720–738. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094785.
Cohen, B. (2014). Advanced introduction to international political economy. Edward Elgar.
Devés, E. (2003). El pensamiento social latinoamericano en el siglo XX. Tomo II. Desde la Cepal al neoliberalismo (1950–1990). Editorial Biblos.
Dos Santos, T. (1968) Socialismo o Fascismo. Dilema Latinoamericano. Editorial Prensa Latinoamericana.
Dos Santos, T. (1969). Socialismo o Fascismo. Dilema Latinoamericano. Santiago: Ediciones Prensa Latinoamericana.
Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. The American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.
Dos Santos, T. (1978). Imperialismo y Dependencia. México: Ediciones Era.
Dos Santos, T. (1998). The theoretical foundations of the Cardoso government: A new stage of the dependency-theory debate. Latin American Perspectives, 25(1), 53–70.
Ebenau, M. (2012). Varieties of capitalism or dependency? A critique of the VoC approach for Latin America. Competition & Change, 16(3), 206–223. https://doi.org/10.1179/1024529412Z.00000000014.
Evans, P. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.
Fischer, A. M. (2015). The end of peripheries? On the enduring relevance of structuralism for understanding contemporary global development. Development and Change, 46(4), 700–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12180.
Frank, André Gunder. (1969). Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America: Historical studies of Chile and Brazil. Monthly Review Press.
Furtado, C. (1966). Subdesarrollo y estancamiento en América Latina (Eudeba, ed.). Buenos Aires.
Gartrell, H.-J., & Gartrell, J. W. (1986). American penetration and Canadian development : A case study of mature dependency. American Sociological Review, 51(2), 201–213.
Goertz, G., & Mahoney, J. (2012). A tale of two cultures: Qualitative and quantitative research in the social sciences. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
González Casanova, P. (1965). Internal colonialism and national development. Studies in Comparative International Development, 1(4), 1–13.
Hall, P. (2003). Aligning ontology and methodology in comparative research. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences (pp. 373–404). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hedström, P., & Ylikovski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.
Helleiner, E., & Rosales, A. (2017). Toward global IPE: The overlooked significance of the haya-mariátegui debate. International Studies Review, 19(4), 667–691. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix034.
Heller, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Snyder, R. (2009). Dependency and development in a globalized world: Looking back and forward. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(4), 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9055-y.
Hinkelammert, F. (1972). Dialéctica del Desarrollo Desigual. Ediciones Universitarias de Valparaíso.
Kaufman, R. R., Chernotsky, H. I., Geller, D. S., Kaufman, R. R., & Chernotsky, H. I. (1975). A preliminary test of the theory of dependency. Comparative Politics, 7(3), 303–330.
Kay, C. (1991). Reflections on the Latin American contribution to development theory. Development and Change, 22(1), 31–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.1991.tb00402.x.
Kay, C. (2019). Theotonio Dos Santos (1936–2018): The revolutionary intellectual who pioneered dependency theory. Development and Change, 0(0), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12560.
Kohli, A. (2004). State-directed development: Political power and industrialization in the global periphery. Cambridge University Press.
Kohli, A. (2009). Nationalist versus dependent capitalist development: Alternate pathways of Asia and Latin America in a globalized world. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(4), 386–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9048-x.
Krippner, G. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: The political origins of the rise of finance. Harvard University Press.
Kvangraven, I. H. (2020). Beyond the stereotype: Restating the relevance of the dependency research programme. Development and Change, 0(0), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12593.
Kvangraven, I. H., Styve, M. D, Kufakurinani, U., & Santana, F. (2017). Dialogues on development. Volume I: Dependency. Institute for New Economic Thinking.
Kvangraven, I. H., & Alves, C. (2019). Heterodox economics as a positive project: Revisiting the debate. Working Paper 19, Global Poverty & Inequality Dynamics Research Network.
Lakatos, I. (1968). Criticism and the methodology of scientific research programmes. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society New Series, 69, 149–186.
Larrain, J. (1989). Theories of development: Capitalism, colonialism, and dependency. Blackwell.
Madariaga, A. (2018). Variedades de capitalismo y sus contribuciones al estudio del desarrollo en América Latina. Política Y Gobierno, 25(2), 441–468.
Madariaga, A., & Palestini, S. (2019). La Influencia Global de Dependencia y Desarrollo en contexto histórico y global. Cuadernos de Teoría Social, 5(9), 74–89.
Mader, P., Mertens, D., & van der Zwan, N. (Eds.). (2020). The Routledge international handbook of financialization. Routledge.
Marini, R. M. (1969). Subdesarrollo y revolución. Mexico: Siglo XXI Editores.
Marini, R. M. (1973). Dialéctica de la Dependencia. Ediciones Era.
Morales, J. J. (2012). De los Aspectos Sociales del Desarrollo Económico a la Teoría de la Dependencia: Sobre la gestación de un pensamiento social propio en Latinoamérica. Cinta Moebio, 45, 235–252. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0717-554x2012000300004.
Mahoney, J., & Rodríguez-Franco, D. (2018). What is dependency theory ? In C. Lancaster & N. van de Walle (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the politics of development (pp. 22–42). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199845156.013.13.
Nölke, A. (2011). Transnational economic order and national economic institutions: Comparative capitalism meets international political economy. MPIfG Working Paper, No. 11/3, Cologne.
Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart., A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670–702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887109990098.
Packenham, R. A. (1992). The dependency movement: Scholarship and politics in development studies. Harvard University Press.
Palestini. (2021). From dependency theory to mechanisms of dependency: the contribution of Latin American dependentistas to Global IR. In A. Acharya, D. Tussie, & M. Deciancio (Ed.), Latin America in global international relations. Routledge.
Palma, J. G. (2009). Why did the Latin American critical tradition in the social sciences become practically extinct? In M. Blyth (Ed.), Routledge handbook of international political economy (IPE) (243–265). Routledge.
Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2007). Variegated capitalism. Progress in Human Geography, 31(6), 731–772. https://doi.org/10.1177/030913250708350.
Schwartz, H. (2007). Dependency or institutions? Economic geography, causal mechanisms, and logic in the understanding of development. Studies in Comparative International Development, 42(1–2), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-007-9000-x.
Sewell, Jr, W.H. (2008). The temporalities of capitalism. Socio-Economic Review, 6(3), 517–537.
Stallings, B. (2020). Dependency in the 21st century? The political economy of China-Latin AmericarRelations. Cambridge University Press.
Streeck, W. (2010a). E Pluribus Unum ? Varieties and Commonalities of Capitalism Wolfgang Streeck. MPIfG Discussion Paper 10/ 12.
Streeck, W. (2010b). Taking capitalism seriously toward an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy MPIfG Discussion Paper (No. 10/15). Cologne.
Sunkel, O. (1970). Desarrollo, subdesarrollo, dependencia, marginación y desaigualdades espaciales: hacia un enfoque totalizante. EURE, 1(1), 13–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913x.2001.tb00029.x.
Sunkel, O., & Paz, P. (1970). El Subdesarrollo Latinoamericano y la Teoría del Desarrollo. Siglo XXI Editores.
Tickner, A. (2016). Associated dependent security cooperation: Colombia and the United States. In J. Hänke & M.-M. Müller (Eds.), The global making of policing: Postcolonial perspectives. Routledge.
Velasco, A. (2009, November 9). The dustbin of history: Dependency theory. Foreign Policy. Available at https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/11/09/the-dustbin-of-history-dependencytheory/.
Wibbels, E. (2006). Dependency revisited: International markets, business cycles, and social spending in the developing world. International Organization, 60(2), 433–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818306060139.
Wibbels, E. (2009). Cores, peripheries, and contemporary political economy. Studies in Comparative International Development, 44(4), 441–449. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-009-9044-1.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Palestini, S., Madariaga, A. (2021). Introduction: Dependency as a Research Program: From Situations to Mechanisms of Dependency. In: Madariaga, A., Palestini, S. (eds) Dependent Capitalisms in Contemporary Latin America and Europe. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71315-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71315-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71314-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71315-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)