Abstract
The role that families, and particularly parents, play in our understandings of the causes of crime has dominated criminological research on families over the past hundred years. In this chapter, we explore this in greater detail, looking first at the history of such research and then examining contemporary ‘risk factor’ approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Between 1801 and 1901, Great Britain’s population grew from 11 million to 37 million.
- 2.
In the second edition of Bowlby’s Child Care and the Growth of Love (1965), Mary Ainsworth added a chapter and clarified that ‘delinquency has not been found to be a common outcome of maternal deprivation or early mother-child separation’ (1965: 197). Nevertheless, Bowlby’s initial ideas about the role of motherhood in delinquency continued to be influential.
- 3.
The addition of this fourth style allowed the typology to operate along two key dimensions: ‘demandingness’ and ‘responsiveness’. Highly demanding/highly responsive = authoritative style; Highly demanding/low responsive = authoritarian style; Low demanding/highly responsive = permissive style; Low demanding/low responsive = rejecting/neglecting style.
- 4.
Interestingly, a key marker identified in the first publication of ‘persistently anti-social juveniles’ was ‘inadequate family income’ (West, 1969)
- 5.
The England Riots took place in London and other English cities over five days during August 2011. They followed the police shooting of Mark Duggan two days earlier in London and a subsequent protest by Duggan’s family and members of his community in response to the police’s actions.
- 6.
It is notable that such families are often labelled as ‘hard-to-reach’, both in policy discourse and in academic discourse, firmly placing the responsibility with them.
- 7.
Examples of established ‘off the shelf’ parenting courses include ‘Triple P’, ‘Take 3 Parenting Programme’, ‘Strengthening Families, Strengthening Communities’ and ‘Time out for Parents’. Such programmes often require a high level of fidelity (that is, working closely to the programme instructions) to ensure ‘programme integrity’ as such programmes are often subject to large-scale evaluation research (see Box 2.4).
- 8.
For example, Rodriguez et al. (2011) highlight how the idea of ‘time out’ felt alien to the Latino parents who were collaborating on the adaptation of a parenting course—it was not a practice that the parents were familiar with. As there was no direct Spanish translation for ‘time out’, then a sporting metaphor was used instead. Similarly, the idea of ‘homework’ was re-framed as ‘practice assignment’ to avoid alienating those parents who had negative experiences of the education system.
- 9.
One adaptation of this programme is Keeping Foster and Kin Parents Supported and Trained (KEEP), a trauma-informed group programme for foster parents and kinship carers to help them support children with emotional and behavioural difficulties.
References
Aichorn, A. (1925/1959). Wayward youth. Imago (first published as Verwahrloster Jugend. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag).
Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J., & Wormith, J. S. (2006). The recent past and near future of risk and/or need assessment. Crime & Delinquency, 52(1), 7–27.
Barn, R., & Das, C. (2016). Family group conferences and cultural competence in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 46(4), 942–959.
Basto-Pereira, M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Advancing knowledge about lifelong crime sequences. British Journal of Criminology, 59(2), 354–377.
Baumrind, D. (1966). Effects of authoritative parental control on child behavior. Child Development, 37(4), 887–907.
Baumrind, D. (1967). Child care practices anteceding three patterns of preschool behavior. Genetic Psychology Monographs, 75(1), 43–88.
Bowlby, J. (1944). Forty-four juvenile thieves: Their characters and home life. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 25(19–52), 107–127.
Bowlby, J. (1965). Child care and the growth of love (2nd ed.). Penguin.
Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame and reintegration. Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan, R. Chamberlain, P., & Smith, D. K. (2017). Treatment Foster Care Oregon for adolescents: Research and Implementation. In John R. Weisz & Alan E. Kazdin (Eds.), Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents (3rd ed.). Guildford Press.
Burt, C. (1925). The young delinquent. University of London Press Ltd.
Butler, S., Anokhina, A., Kaminska, K., Watmuff, C., & Fonagy, P. (2017). Multisystemic therapy-family integrated transitions (MST-FIT): A feasibility study. University College London/Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families.
Campbell, C., Devlin, R., O’Mahony, D., Doak, J., Jackson, J., Corrigan, T., & McEvoy, K. (2005). Evaluation of the Northern Ireland Youth Conference Service. Northern Ireland Office.
Chamberlain, P. (2003). The Oregon multidimensional treatment foster care model: Features, outcomes, and progress in dissemination. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 303–312.
Cunneen, C. (2017). Community conferencing and the fiction of indigenous control. In Restorative justice (pp. 335–354). Routledge.
DCLG, Department for Communities and Local Government. (2012, December). Working with troubled families: A guide to the evidence and good practice. Available from www.gov.uk/dclg.
DCLG, Department for Communities and Local Government. (2015, June 22). PM praises troubled families programme success, Press Release. London: DCLG. Available online at www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-praises-troubled-families-programme-success.
Donzelot, J. (1979). The policing of families. London: Hutchinson.
Farrington, D. P. (1995). The development of offending and antisocial behaviour from childhood: Key findings from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 6(36), 929–964.
Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Ttofi, M. M. (2012). Risk and protective factors for offending. In B. C. Welsh & D. P. Farrington (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of crime prevention (pp. 46–69). Oxford University Press.
Fearon, R. P., & Roisman, G. I. (2017). Attachment theory: Progress and future directions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 15, 131–136.
Finch, J. (1989). Family obligations and social change. Polity Press.
Foucault, M. (1975/1991). Discipline and punish: the Birth of the prison. Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In H. R. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1991). On governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), ‘The Foucault effect’: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104.). Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Fox, B. (2017). It’s nature and nurture: Integrating biology and genetics into the social learning theory of criminal behavior. Journal of Criminal Justice, 49, 22–31.
Friedlander, K. (1947). The psycho-analytical approach to juvenile delinquency: Theory, case-studies, treatment. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Gelsthorpe, E., & Burney, E. (2007, July 6). Parenting as crime control: A critique of government policy. Paper presented at Parenting: An Interdisciplinary Workshop. Centre for Research in the Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Cambridge.
Ghate, D., & Ramella, M. (2002). Positive parenting: The national evaluation of the Youth Justice Board’s parenting programme. Policy Research Bureau.
Glueck, E., & Glueck, S. (1950). Unraveling juvenile delinquency. The Commonwealth Fund.
Goldman, D., & Fishbein, D. H. (2000). Genetic bases for impulsive and antisocial behaviors—Can their course be altered? In The science, treatment, and prevention of antisocial behaviors: Application to the criminal justice system (p. 1).
Hartnett, D., Carr, A., Hamilton, E., & O’Reilly, G. (2017). The effectiveness of functional family therapy for adolescent behavioral and substance misuse problems: A meta-analysis. Family Process, 56(3), 607–619.
Healy, W., & Bronner, A. F. (1936). New light on delinquency and its treatment. Greenwood Press.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. University of California Press.
Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. University of California.
Holt, A. (2010). Managing ‘spoiled identities’: Parents’ experiences of compulsory parenting support programmes. Children and Society, 24(5), 413–423.
Hoyle, C., & Noguera, S. (2008). Supporting young offenders through restorative justice: Parents as (in)appropriate adults. British Journal of Community Justice, 6(3), 67–85.
Humayun, S., Herlitz, L., Chesnokov, M., Doolan, M., Landau, S., & Scott, S. (2017). Randomized controlled trial of Functional Family Therapy for offending and antisocial behavior in UK youth. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 58, 1023–1032.
Ingleby, D. (1985). Professionals as socializers: The “psy complex”. Research in Law, Deviance and Social Control, 7, 79–109.
Jeong, S., McGarrell, E. F., & Hipple, N. K. (2012). Long-term impact of family group conferences on re-offending: The Indianapolis restorative justice experiment. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(4), 369–385.
Karpman, S. (1968). Fairy tales and script drama analysis. Transactional Analysis Bulletin, 7(26), 39–43.
Keown, L. J., Sanders, M. R., Franke, N., & Shepherd, M. (2018). Te Whānau POU Toru: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) of a culturally adapted low-intensity variant of the triple P-Positive parenting program for Indigenous Māori families in New Zealand. Prevention Science, 19(7), 954–965.
Krohn, M. D., & Massey, J. L. (1980). Social control and delinquent behavior: An examination of the elements of the social bond. The Sociological Quarterly, 21(4), 529–544.
Kulis, S. S., Tsethlikai, M., Harthun, M. L., Hibbeler, P. K., Ayers, S. L., & Deschine Parkhurst, N. (2019). Parenting in 2 worlds: Effects of a culturally grounded parenting intervention for urban American Indians on participant cultural engagement. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology.
Lamborn, S. D., Mounts, N. S., Steinberg, L., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1991). Patterns of competence and adjustment among adolescents from authoritative, authoritarian, indulgent, and neglectful families. Child Development, 62(5), 1049–1065.
Lindfield, S. (2002, March). Parenting orders. Magistrate, pp. 74–75.
Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (1998). The development of male offending: Key findings from the first decade of the Pittsburgh Youth Study. Studies on Crime & Crime Prevention, 7(2), 141–171.
Maccoby, E. E., & Martin, J. A. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent–child interaction. In P. Mussen & E. M. Hetherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, volume IV: Socialization, personality, and social development. Wiley.
May, M. (1973/2002). Innocence and experience: The evolution of the concept of juvenile delinquency in the mid-nineteenth century. In J. Muncie, G. Hughes, & E. McLaughlin (Eds.), Youth justice: Critical readings (pp. 98–115). Sage.
McCord, J. (1979). Some child-rearing antecedents of criminal behavior in adult men. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1477–1486.
Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2001). Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Development and Psychopathology, 13(2), 355–375.
Moyle, P., & Tauri, J. M. (2016). Māori, family group conferencing and the mystifications of restorative justice. Victims & Offenders, 11(1), 87–106.
Parra-Cardona, J. R., Bybee, D., Sullivan, C. M., Rodríguez, M. M. D., Dates, B., Tams, L., et al. (2017). Examining the impact of differential cultural adaptation with Latina/o immigrants exposed to adapted parent training interventions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(1), 58.
Parton, N. (1991). Governing the family: Child care, child protection and the state. Macmillan.
Richards, K. (2017). Responsibilising the parents of young offenders through restorative justice: A genealogical account. Restorative Justice, 5(1), 93–115.
Robbins, M. S., Alexander, J. F., Turner, C. W., & Hollimon, A. (2016). Evolution of functional family therapy as an evidence-based practice for adolescents with disruptive behavior problems. Family Process, 55(3), 543–557.
Rodriguez, M. M. D., Baumann, A. A., & Schwartz, A. L. (2011). Cultural adaptation of an evidence based intervention: From theory to practice in a Latino/a community context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 47(1–2), 170–186.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul. Routledge.
Stubbs, J. (2002). Domestic violence and women’s safety: Feminist challenges to restorative justice. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and family violence (pp. 42–61). Cambridge University Press.
Tremblay, R. E., Loeber, R., Gagnon, C., Charlebois, P., Larivée, S., & LeBlanc, M. (1991). Disruptive boys with stable and unstable high fighting behavior patterns during junior elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19(3), 285–300.
Van der Stouwe, T., Asscher, J. J., Stams, G. J. J., Deković, M., & van der Laan, P. H. (2014). The effectiveness of multisystemic therapy (MST): A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(6), 468–481.
Van Mourik, K., Crone, M. R., De Wolff, M. S., & Reis, R. (2017). Parent training programs for ethnic minorities: A meta-analysis of adaptations and effect. Prevention Science, 18(1), 95–105.
Welshman, J. (2017). Troubles and the family: Changes and continuities since 1943. Social Policy and Society, 16(1), 109–117.
West, D. J. (1969). Present conduct and future delinquency; first report of the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. New York: International Universities Press.
Wikström, P. O. H., & Loeber, R. (2000). Do disadvantaged neighborhoods cause well‐adjusted children to become adolescent delinquents? A study of male juvenile serious offending, individual risk and protective factors, and neighborhood context. Criminology, 38(4), 1109–1142.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Useful Websites
Useful Websites
National Implementation Service (NIS)
https://www.evidencebasedinterventions.org.uk.
Website hosted by the NIS and the National Health Service (NHS) which provides evidence on a range of interventions that work with ‘looked after children, children on the edge of care or custody and their families’. Features information and resources on interventions including Functional Family Therapy (https://www.functionalfamilytherapy.org.uk), Multi-Systemic Therapy (http://www.mstuk.org) and Keep (https://www.keep.org.uk).
Troubled Families
https://troubledfamilies.blog.gov.uk.
Blog hosted by the UK government which highlights the range of family intervention work across the UK that falls within the remit of the Troubled Families policy initiative.
Treatment Foster Care Oregon
Website hosted by the TFCO team in Oregon, United States that features information, resources, research and training for professionals interested in the TFCO programme for pre-schoolers (TFCO-P), primary-aged children (TFCO-C) and adolescents (TFCO-A).
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Holt, A. (2021). The Criminogenic Family: Families as the Cause of Crime in Research and Policy. In: Family Criminology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71169-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71169-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71168-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71169-6
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)