Abstract
There is a longstanding tradition to leave children out when making decisions about their lives. It is an important ethical decision of inviting children to participate. Themes in this chapter are how supervisors can support a practice for children’s participation, strengthening agency and supporting the professionals to gain competence in talking with children. It is sometimes a challenge to develop new ways of working, which assumes the characteristics of learning organizations, because individual changes will not be sufficient to change values the organizations are based on, or the professionals’ habits or attitudes. Children’s participation assumes agency. Supervisors might strengthen professionals’ agency, which in turn support the development of children’s agency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahern, E. C., Andrews, S. J., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2015). The productivity of wh-promts in child forensic interviews. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(13), 2007–2015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260515621084.
Andersen, D., & Kjærulf, A. (2003). Hva kan børn svare på? Om børn som respondenter i kvantitative spørgeskemaundersøgelser [Children as respondents on quantitative questionnaires]. Socialforskningsinstituttet.
Andrews, S. J., Ahern, E. C., Stolzenberg, S. N., & Lyon, T. D. (2016). The productivity of wh- prompts when children testify. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(3), 341–349. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3204.
Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2014). The effects of age and delay on responses to repeated questions in forensic interviews with children alleging sexual abuse. Law and Human Behavior, 38(2), 171–180. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb000064.
Andrews, S. J., & Lamb, M. E. (2016). How do lawyers examine and cross-examine children in Scotland? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(6), 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3286.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 124–148. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(2), 164–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x.
Bandura, A. (2007). Reflections on an agentic theory of human behavior. Tidsskrift for Norsk Psykologforening, 44(8), 995–1004.
Bishop, D. V. M. (2014). Uncommon understanding: Development and disorders of language comprehension in children. Psychology Press.
Berg, R. C., Munthe‐Kaas, H. M., Baiju, N., Muller, A. E., & Brurberg, K. G. (2019). The accuracy of using openended questions in structured conversations with children: A systematic review. Folkehelseinstituttet.
Castaneda, D. I., Manrique, L. F., & Cuellar, S. (2018). Is organizational learning being absorbed by knowledge management? A systematic review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(2), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2017-0041.
Cossar, J., Brandon, M., & Jordan, P. (2014). You’ve got to trust her and she’s got to trust you: Children’s views on participation in the child protection system. Child and Family Social Work, 21(1), 103–112.
Diesendruck, G., & Lindenbaum, T. (2009). Self-protective optimism: Children’s biased beliefs about the stability of traits. Social Development, 18(4), 946–961. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00494.x.
Droit-Volet, S. (2013). Time perception in children: A neurodevelopmental approach. Neuropsychologia, 51(2), 220–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.023.
Einarsdottir, j, Dockett, S., & Perry, B. (2009). Making meaning: Children’s perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 179(2), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430802666999.
Erdelyi, M. H., & Becker, J. (1974). Hypermnesia for pictures: Incremental memory for pictures but not words in multiple recall trials. Cognitive Psychology, 6(1), 159–171.
Fiol, C. M., & Lyles, M. A. (1985). Organizational learning. Academy of Management Review, 10, 803–813.
Forman, H. (2015). Events and children’s sense of time: A perspective on the origins of everyday time-keeping. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 259. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00259.
Gentle, M., Powell, M. B., & Sharman, S. J. (2014). Mental context reinstatement or drawing: Which better enhances children’s recall of witnessed events and protects against suggestive questions? Australian Journal of Psychology, 66(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12040.
Gernhardt, A., Keller, H., & Rübelling, H. (2016). Children’s family drawings as expressions of attachment representations across cultures: Possibilities and limitations. Child Development, 87(4), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12516.
Gherardi, S. (2000). Practice-based theorizing on learning and knowing in organizations. Organization, 7, 211–223.
Gosse, L. L., & Roberts, K. P. (2014). Children’s use of a «time line» to indicate when events occurred. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 29(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-013-9118-x.
Gross, J., Hayne, H., & Drury, T. (2009). Drawing facilitates children’s reports of factual and narrative information: Implications for educational contexts. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(7), 953–971. https://doi.org/10.1002/ACP.1518.
Huysman, M. (2002). Organizational learning and communities of practice: A social constructivist perspective. Retrieved March 5, 2010 from http://apollon1.alba.edu.gr/OKLC2002/athens2.pdf.
Lamotte, M., Izaute, M., & Droit-Volet, S. (2012). Awareness of time distortions and its relation with time judgment: A metacognitive approach. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(2), 835–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.02.012.
La Rooy, D., Pipe, M. & Murray, J. E. (2005). Reminiscence and hypermnesia in children’s eyewitness memory. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 90(3), 235–254.
LaPuglia, J. A., Wilford, M. M., Rivard, J. R., Chan, J. C. K., & Fisher, R. P. (2014). Misleading suggestions can alter later memory reports even following a cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2950.
Lockhart, K. L., Goddu, M. K., & Keil, F. C. (2016). Overoptimism about future knowledge: Early arrogance? The Journal of Positive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167939.
London, K., Hall, A. K., & Lytle, N. E. (2017). Does it help, hurt, or something else? The effect of a something else response alternative on children’s performance on forced-choice questions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 23(3), 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000129.
Ogden, R. S., Samuels, M., Simmons, F., Wearden, J. & Montgomery, C. (2017). The differential recruitment of short[1]term memory and executive functions during time, number, and length perception: An individual differences approach. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(3), 657–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1271445.
Otgaar, H., Howe, M. L., Merckelbach, H., & Muris, P. (2018). Who is the better eyewitness? Sometimes adults but at other times children. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(5), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418770998.
Patterson, T., & Hayne, H. (2011). Does drawing facilitate older children’s reports of emotionally laden events? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1650.
Pipe, M.-E., & Salmon, K. (2009). Dolls, drawing, body diagrams, and other props: Role of props in investigative interviews. In K. Kuehnle & M. Connell (Eds.), The evaluation of child sexual abuse allegations: A comprehensive guide to assessment and testimony (pp. 365–395). Wiley.
Poole, D. A. (2016). Interviewing children: The science of conversation in forensic contexts. Washington, DC: The Ameri can Psychological Association.
Poole, D. A., Dickinson, J. J., & Brubacher, S. P. (2014). Sources of unreliable testimony from children. Roger Williams University Law Review, 19, 382–410.
Simon, H. A. (1991). Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science, 2, 125–134.
Stolzenberg, S. N., Williams, S., McWilliams, K., Liang, C., & Lyon, T. D. (2019). The utility of direct questions in eliciting subjective content from children disclosing sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.02.014.
Sun, P., & Scott, J. (2003). Exploring the divide – Organizational learning and learning organizations. The Learning Organization, 10(4), 202–215.
van Bijleveld, G. G., Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G., & Dedding, C. W. M. (2020). Exploring the essence of enabling child participation with child protection services. Child and Family Social Work, 25(2), 286–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12684.
Waterhouse, G. F., Ridley, A. M., Bull, R., La Rooy, D. & Wilcock, R. (2016). Dynamics of repeated interviews with children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30(5), 713–721. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3246.
Zélanti, P., & Droit-Volet, S. (2011). Cognitive abilities explaining age-related changes in time perception of short and long durations. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kvello, Ø. (2021). A Child-Friendly Supervision: Inviting Children to Participate. In: Ness, O., McNamee, S., Kvello, Ø. (eds) Relational Processes in Counselling and Psychotherapy Supervision . Palgrave Texts in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71010-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-71010-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-71009-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-71010-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)