Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

The American Professor Pundit pp 31–60Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Variation in Media Influence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers readers a broad overview of several literatures concerning media effects, the history of modern journalism, and the development of broadcast news (e.g., television). The chapter links the larger consideration of punditry and academic appearances across media to the academic study of how those in elite positions influence public perceptions. The chapter also features famous quotes from journalism giants Walter Lippmann and Edward R. Murrow. Both journalists offered insights over the last century that speak directly to the need for academics to add their contributions in the production of political coverage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdenour, Jesse. 2017. Inspecting the investigators: An analysis of television investigative journalism and factors leading to its production. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 2008. Is polarization a myth? Journal of Politics 70: 542–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 1981. The mass news media in systematic, historical, and comparative perspective. In Mass media and social change, ed. E. Katz and T. Szecsko. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altheide, David L., and R.P. Snow. 1979. Media logic. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansolabehere, Stephen L., and Shanto Iyengar. 1996. Going negative: How political advertisements shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux, Kevin, and Martin Johnson. 2014. Changing minds or changing channels? Partisan news in an age of choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, R.Douglas. 2006. Congress, the press, and political accountability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aucoin, James L. 1997. The investigative tradition in American journalism. American Journalism 14: 317–329

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, Larry M. 1993. Messages received: The political impact of media exposure. American Political Science Review 87: 267–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, Matthew A. 2003. Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy in the new media age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, Vincent. 1977. The checking value in first amendment theory. Law and Social Inquiry 2: 521–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brader, Ted. 2005. Striking a responsive chord: How political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. American Journal of Political Science 49: 388–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brians, Craig Leonard, and Martin P. Wattenberg. 1986. Campaign issue knowledge and salience: Comparing reception from TV commercials, TV news, and newspapers. American Journal of Political Science 40: 172–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bro, Peter. 2012. License to comment: The popularization of a political commentator. Journalism Studies 13: 433–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broder, David. 1987. Behind the front page. New York: Vintage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calfano, Brian Robert, and Paul A. Djupe. 2009. God talk: Religious cues and electoral support. Political Research Quarterly 62: 329–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cappella, Joseph N., and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1997. Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Richard F., and Bradley S. Greenberg. 1965. Newspapers or television: Which do you believe? Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 42: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., and Joan Schleuder. 1986. Measurement and effects of attention to media news. Human Communication Research 13: 76–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven H., Xinshu Zhao, and Glenn Leshner. 1994. Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research 21: 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaffee, Steven, and Stacey Frank. 1996. How Americans get political information: Print versus broadcast news. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546: 48–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Lawrence K.H., and James B. Lembert. 1968. The invisible newsman and other factors in media competition. Journalism Quarterly 45: 436–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chong, Dennis. 1993. How people think, reason, and feel about rights and liberties. American Journal of Political Science 37: 867–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conover, Pamela J., Donald D. Searing, and Ivor M. Crewe. 2002. The deliberative potential of political discussion. British Journal of Political Science 32: 21–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Philip E. 1964. The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In Ideology and its discontents, ed. David E. Apter. New York: The Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • DellaVigna, Stefano, and Ethan Kaplan. 2007. The Fox News effect: Media bias and voting. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122: 1187–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vreese, Claes H. 2004. The effects of frames in political television on issue interpretation and frame salience. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 81: 36–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, John. 1927. The public and its problems. Athens, OH: Swallow Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilliplane, Susanna, Seth K. Goldman, and Diana C. Mutz. 2013. Televised exposure to politics: New measures for a fragmented media environment. American Journal of Political Science 57: 236–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domke, David, Dhavan V. Shah, and Daniel B. Wackman. 1998. Media priming effects: Accessibility, association, and activation. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 10: 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, James N. 2001. The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior 23: 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Druckman, James N. 2004. Priming the vote: Campaign effects in a U.S. Senate election. Political Psychology 25: 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunaway, Johanna. 2016. Mobile vs. computer: Implications for news audiences and outlets. Discussion Paper Series #D-103. Shorenstein Center, Harvard University. August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, Murray. 1988. Skeptical studies of language, the media, and mass culture. American Political Science Review 82: 1333–1339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, Edward J. 1973. News from nowhere. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erdal, Ivar John. 2007. Researching media convergence and crossmedia news production. Nordicom Review 28: 51–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, James S., and Theodore L. Glasser. 1998. Custodians of conscience: investigative journalism and public virtue. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friendly, Fred. 1967. Due to circumstances beyond our control. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentzkow, Matthew. 2007. Television and voter turnout. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 121: 931–972.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Lisa M., and Waldfogel. 2006. The New York Times and the market for local newspapers. American Economic Review 96: 435–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, Alan S., Dean Karlan, and Daniel Bergan. 2009. Does the media matter? A field experiment measuring the effect of newspapers on voting behavior and political opinion. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 1: 35–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, Maria Elizabeth, and Erik Page Bucy. 2009. Image bite politics: News and the visual framing of elections. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A. 1994. The infotainment quotient in routine television news: A director’s perspective. Discourse & Society 5: 483–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, Doris A., and Johanna Dunaway. 2018. Mass media and American politics, 10th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: CQ Press/Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, Daniel C. 1986. We keep America on top of the world. In Watching television, ed. T. Gitlin, 9–18. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han, Lori Cox, and Brian Calfano. 2018. Conflict and candidate selection: Game framing voter choice. American Politics Research 46: 169–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hero, Rodney E. 1992. Latinos and the U.S. political system: Two-tiered pluralism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins-Dobney, Carey L., and Gerald Sussman. 2013. The growth of TV news, the demise of the journalism profession. Media, Culture & Society 35: 847–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holcomb, Jesse. 2018. Digital adaptation in local news. Columbia Journalism Review, September 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huckfeldt, Robert, Jeanette M. Mendez, and Tracy Osborn. 2004. Disagreement, ambivalence, and engagement: The political consequences of heterogenous networks. Political Psychology 25: 65–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is anyone responsible?. How Television Frames Political Issues: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, Shanto. 1996. Framing responsibility for political issues. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546: 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, Kathleen Hall. 1992. Dirty politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson-Cartee, Karen S. 2004. News narratives and news framing. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 2001. The advantages and disadvantages of cognitive heuristics in political decision making. American Journal of Political Science 45: 951–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Raymond S.H. 1978. Credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly 55: 282–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leshner, Glenn, and Michael L. McKean. 1997. Using TV news for political information during an off-year election: Effects on political knowledge and cynicism. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 74: 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. Partisan media exposure and attitudes toward the opposition. Political Communication 30: 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, Robert, and Richard E. Noyes. 1996. Good intentions make bad news: Why Americans hate campaign journalism, 2nd ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippman, Walter. 1922. Public opinion. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery, Shearon A., and Melvin L. DeFleur. 1995. Milestones in mass communication research, 3rd ed. New York: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lupia, Arthur. 2015. Uninformed: Why people seem to know so little about politics and what we can do about it. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKuen, Michael Bruce, and Steven Lane Coombs. 1981. More than news: Media power in public affairs. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E. 2002. The sentimental citizen: Emotion in democratic politics. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, George E., W. Russell Neuman, and Michael MacKuen. 2000. Affective intelligence and political judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, Maxwell. 1997. Building consensus: The news media’s agenda-setting roles. Political Communication 14: 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McManus, John H. 1994. Market driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, Dennis. 1983. Mass communication theory. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McQuail, Dennis. 2001. Television news research: Retrospect and prospect. In Television news research: Recent European approaches and findings, ed. Karsten Renckstorf, Denis McQuail, and Nicholas Jankowski. Berlin, Germany: Quintessence Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, Michael, and James Shanahan. 1992. Television viewing and voting 1972–1989. Electoral Studies 11: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutz, Diana C., and Byron Reeves. 2005. The new videomalaise: Effects of televised incivility on political trust. American Political Science Review 99: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, Thomas E., Zoe M. Oxley, and Rosalee A. Clawson. 1997. Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior 19: 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newhagen, John E., and Byron Reeves. 1992. The evening’s bad news: Effects of compelling negative television news images on memory. Journal of Communication 42: 25–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, Michael Z., and Elana Levine. 2012. Legitimating television: Media convergence and cultural status. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, W. Russell, Marion Just, and Ann Crigler. 1992. Common knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, Rasmus Kelis, and Richard Sambrook. 2016. What is happening to television news? Reuters institute for the study of journalism. Oxford, UK: University of Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, Dan, and James E. Combs. 1983. Mediated political realities. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, Dan, and James E. Combs. 1985. Nightly Horrors: Crisis coverage by television network news. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nimmo, Dan, and James E. Combs. 1992. The political pundits. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pach Jr., Chester C. 2000. TV’s 1968: War, politics, and violence on the network evening news. South Central Review. 17: 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, Benjamin, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The rational public: Fifty years of trends in American policy preferences. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, W.Gerrod, and Jay Schulkin. 1993. Neuropsychology and the cognitive nature of the emotions. Cognition and Emotion 7: 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Thomas. 1993. Out of order. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, Thomas, and Robert McClure. 1976. The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national elections. New York: Putnams.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Chris. 2010. No-spin Zones: The rise of the American cable news magazine and Bill O’Reilly. Journalism Studies 11: 832–851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponce de Leon, Charles L. 2015. That’s the way it is: A history of television news in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-broadcast democracy: How media choice increases inequality in political involvement and polarizes elections. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prior, Markus. 2014. Visual political knowledge: A different road to competence? Journal of Politics 76: 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 1995. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6: 65–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ripley, Amanda. 2019. Complicating the narratives. Medium, January 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Michael J. 1976. Public affairs television and the growth of political malaise: The case of ‘The Selling of the Pentagon’. American Political Science Review 70: 409–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogstad, Ingrid Dahlen. 2014. Political news journalists in social media: Making everyone a political pundit. Journalism Practice 8: 688–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscho, Bernard. 1975. Newsmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel, Tom, Marion Just, Todd Belt, Atiba Pertilla, Walter Dean, and Dante Chinni. 2007. We interrupt this newscast: How to improve local news and win ratings, too. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sabato, Larry J. 2000. Feeding Frenzy: Attack journalism and American politics. Baltimore, MD: Lanahan Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sands, John. 2019. Local news is more trusted than national news—But that could change. Miami, FL: Knight Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, Eric E. 1960. The semisovereign people: A realist’s view of democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, Michael. 1978. Discovering the news: A social history of American Newspapers. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somin, Ilya. 1998. Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal. Critical Review 12: 413–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stroud, Natalie J. 2011. Niche news: The politics of news choice. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swift, Art. 2016. Americans’ trust in mass media sinks to new low. Washington, DC: The Gallup Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tannenbaum, Percy H. 1963. Communication of science information. Science 140: 579–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, Barbara. 1978. Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unz, Dagmar, Frank Schwab, and Peter Winterhoff-Spurk. 2008. TV news—The daily horror: Emotional effects of violent television news. Journal of Media PsTychology 20: 141–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, Nicholas A., Matthew N. Beckman, and Thomas A. Buhr. 2001. A spiral of cynicism for some. Political Communication 18: 347–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vraga, Emily, Leticia Bode, and Sonya Troller-Renfree. 2016. Beyond self-reports: Using eye tracking to measure topic and style differences in attention to social media content. Communication Methods and Measures 10: 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yagade, Aileen, and David M. Dozier. 1990. The media agenda-setting effect on concrete versus abstract issues. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly 67: 3–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur, Susan K. 1978. The history of television in Los Angeles, 1931–1952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bruce A., and Michael X. Delli Carpini. 2011. After broadcast news: Media regimes, democracy, and the new information environment. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zaller, John. 1992. The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, Harold G. 1978. The variable nature of media influence. In Communication yearbook, ed. B.D. Ruben, 225–245. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Brian R. Calfano

  2. Department of Political Science, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, USA

    Valerie Martinez-Ebers

  3. Department of Political Science, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    Aida Ramusovic

Authors
  1. Brian R. Calfano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Valerie Martinez-Ebers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Aida Ramusovic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian R. Calfano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Calfano, B.R., Martinez-Ebers, V., Ramusovic, A. (2021). The Variation in Media Influence. In: The American Professor Pundit. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70877-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation