Skip to main content

Artificial Intelligence Applications in Stroke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Precision Medicine in Stroke
  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

Machine learning and other artificial intelligence techniques have been extensively used in a large number of medical applications, in diagnosis, treatment selection, mining of electronic health records, genetics, and image processing, among several others. Machine learning techniques can be used to infer predictive models, from labeled data, in many areas of medicine, including stroke. In particular, in patients who suffered from stroke, machine learning can be used to perform or improve outcome prediction, lesion segmentation, and treatment assessment, among others. Machine learning algorithms can be based on a number of different approaches. In this chapter, we cover the symbolic, statistical, similarity-based, and connectionist approaches, which have different properties and trade-offs. Recently, a set of techniques generally known as deep learning have increased significantly the range of applicability of machine learning methods, which are now able to deal with several problems characterized by high-dimensional data, such as images and videos, outperforming even experts in tasks such as lesion segmentation and outcome prediction. We provide an overview of the different machine learning methods used in the stroke area and some of the applications proposed by researchers in the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Domingos P. The master algorithm. London: Allen Lane; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Quinlan JR. Induction of decision trees. Mach Learn. 1986;1(1):81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Quinlan JR. C4.5—programs for machine learning. San Mateo: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breiman L, Friedman J, Stone CJ, Olshen RA. Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Saraee MH, Keane J. Using T3, an improved decision tree classifier, for mining stroke-related medical data. Methods Inf Med. 2007;46(5):523–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Letham B, Rudin C, McCormick TH, Madigan D. Interpretable classifiers using rules and Bayesian analysis: Building a better stroke prediction model. Ann Appl Stat. 2015;9(3):1350–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Monteiro M, Fonseca AC, Freitas AT, Pinho E, Melo T, Francisco AP, Ferro JM, Oliveira AL. Using machine learning to improve the prediction of functional outcome in ischemic stroke patients. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2018;15(6):1953–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heo JN, Yoon JG, Park H, Kim YD, Nam HS, Heo JH. Machine learning-based model for prediction of outcomes in acute stroke. Stroke. 2019;50(5):1263–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Domingos P, Pazzani M. On the optimality of the simple Bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Mach Learn. 1997;29(2–3):103–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support-vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20(3):273–97.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Scholkopf B, Smola AJ. Learning with kernels: support vector machines, regularization, optimization, and beyond, Adaptive computation and machine learning series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2018.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeena RS, Kumar S. Stroke prediction using SVM. In: 2016 International conference on control, instrumentation, communication and computational technologies (ICCICCT 2016). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE; 2017. p. 600–2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rosenblatt F. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev. 1958;65(6):386–408.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Minsky M, Papert S. Perceptrons. Cambridge: MIT Press; 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature. 1986;5(6088):533–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fukushima K, Miyake S. Neocognitron: a self-organizing neural network model for a mechanism of visual pattern recognition. In: Competition and cooperation in neural nets. Berlin: Springer; 1982. p. 267–85.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. LeCun Y, Boser B, Denker JS, Henderson D, Howard RE, Hubbard W, et al. Backpropagation applied to handwritten ZIP code recognition. Neural Comput. 1989;1(4):541–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012. p. 1097–105.

    Google Scholar 

  19. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, Dec 2016. p. 770–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Szegedy C, Vanhoucke V, Ioffe S, Shlens J, Wojna Z. Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  21. Huang G, Liu Z, Van Der Maaten L, Weinberger KQ. Densely connected convolutional networks. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition (CVPR 2017), Jan 2017. p. 2261–9.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Drozdowska BA, Singh S, Quinn TJ. Thinking about the future: a review of prognostic scales used in acute stroke. Front Neurol. 2019;10:274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin C-H, Hsu K-C, Johnson KR, Fann YC, Tsai C-H, Sun Y, et al. Evaluation of machine learning methods to stroke outcome prediction using a nationwide disease registry. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2020;190:105381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maier O, Menze BH, von der Gablentz J, Häni L, Heinrich MP, Liebrand M, et al. ISLES 2015—a public evaluation benchmark for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation from multispectral MRI. Med Image Anal. 2017;35:250–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Winzeck S, Hakim A, McKinley R, Pinto JA, Alves V, Silva C, et al. ISLES 2016 and 2017-benchmarking ischemic stroke lesion outcome prediction based on multispectral MRI. Front Neurol. 2018;9:679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kamal H, Lopez V, Sheth SA. Machine learning in acute ischemic stroke neuroimaging. Front Neurol. 2018;9:7–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sheth SA, Lopez-Rivera V, Barman A, Grotta JC, Yoo AJ, Lee S, et al. Machine learning-enabled automated determination of acute ischemic core from computed tomography angiography. Stroke. 2019;50(11):3093–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nielsen A, Hansen MB, Tietze A, Mouridsen K. Prediction of tissue outcome and assessment of treatment effect in acute ischemic stroke using deep learning. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1394–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Chauhan S, Vig L, De Grazia MDF, Corbetta M, Ahmad S, Zorzi M. A comparison of shallow and deep learning methods for predicting cognitive performance of stroke patients from MRI lesion images. Front Neuroinform. 2019;13:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arlindo L. Oliveira .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oliveira, A.L. (2021). Artificial Intelligence Applications in Stroke. In: Fonseca, A.C., Ferro, J.M. (eds) Precision Medicine in Stroke. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70761-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70761-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70760-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70761-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics