Skip to main content

‘Little soft oases’: Edmund Gosse, the Hard-Driven Soul and Inconsolability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Autobiography
  • 143 Accesses

Abstract

Edmund Gosse’s account of his childhood is found in his masterpiece, Father and Son. In this book, Gosse attempts to come to terms with his upbringing at the hands of a man fanatically devoted to a sect of evangelical Calvinism, the Plymouth Brethren. I explore here what I take to be the central things we can learn about such a faith—and, by implication, other kinds of religious (Christian) faith—from this text. I suggest that it is profound exploration of one of the key ways in which human beings maim themselves and that they do this—in such cases, at any rate—in an attempt to escape from the inconsolability of the human condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I have used the edition in Gosse 2004 [1907]. Otherwise non-attributed parenthetical page references in this chapter refer to this edition.

  2. 2.

    Cf. section IV (190–2) of Porter 1975, especially the quotation from Virginia Woolf at 191.

  3. 3.

    Contrast William Gracie, who claims that Gosse presents his father as being worse than he in fact was. He suggests that we see this is so if we pay attention to the ‘symbolism and imagery’ of Gosse’s text. His claim is that such attention shows that Gosse wishes to imply, without directly saying, that ‘his father…deliberately crush[ed] his son’s innate gifts of artistic consciousness and expression’ (Gracie 1974, 186). This claim is puzzling since in one sense it is obviously clear that Philip Gosse did deliberately seek to crush his son, and Edmund makes no secret of that. But he sought to do so through what he conceived of as love and solicitude, so, in another sense, we can rightly say that Edmund never—any more than his father did—explicitly entertained the thought that his father wished to crush him. You can crush someone through love, and it is often easier to do that than crush him through unmasked violence or aggression, precisely because it is harder for anyone, yourself included, to see that this is what you are doing. I am not sure that Gracie sees the complexities here and I find the points he makes rather forced. Roger J. Porter, taking a somewhat more generous view of Gosse’s style than does Gracie, sees his account as ‘a model of tonal complication in its attempt to be fair and judicious to the elder man’ (Porter 1975, 174).

  4. 4.

    Ruth Hoberman (Hoberman 1988) argues that, in his book, Gosse identifies himself with, understands himself in terms of, figures of women as he liberates himself from his father’s influence. This reading is certainly not entirely implausible, but is surely complicated by the fact that Gosse claims that his mother ‘exercised…a magnetic power over the will and nature of my Father’ (11), a power that continued even after her death. The figure of the woman thus occupies to a very large extent a repressive and oppressive role in Gosse’s narrative, no less so than does the figure of the man. Cf. also what Gosse says about Mrs Paget, discussed below.

  5. 5.

    Michael Newton in his introduction to Gosse 2004 [1907], xvii.

  6. 6.

    See, again, Porter 1975, 190–2.

Bibliography

  • Allen, P. 1988 ‘Sir Edmund Gosse and His Modern Readers: the Continued Appeal of Father and Son’. ELH, vol. 55, no. 2, 487–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, J. 1983 [1900] Lord Jim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. 2012 Essays in Biography. Virginia: Axios Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosse, E. 2004 [1907] Father and Son. Edited with an introduction and notes Michael Newton. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gracie, W.J. 1974 ‘Truth of Form in Edmund Gosse’s Father and Son’, The Journal of Narrative Technique, vol. 4, no. 3, 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberman, R. 1988 ‘Narrative Duplicity and Women in Edmund Gosse’s Father and Son’. Biography, vol. 11, no. 4, 303–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maugham, W.S. 1944 [1938] The Summing Up. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche, F. 1988a [1878–1880] Menschliches, Allzumenschliches in G. Colli and M. Montinari (ed.) Sämtliche Werke: Kritische Studienausgabe, 15 vols, Band 2. Berlin: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orwell, G. 1984c ‘Benefit of Clergy: Some Notes on Salvador Dalí’ in The Penguin Essays of George Orwell, 254–262. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascal, B. 2000 [1670] Pensées Paris: LGF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, R.J. 1975 ‘Edmund Gosse’s Father and Son: Between Form and Flexibility’. The Journal of Narrative Technique, vol. 5, no. 3, 174–195.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Hamilton .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hamilton, C. (2021). ‘Little soft oases’: Edmund Gosse, the Hard-Driven Soul and Inconsolability. In: Philosophy and Autobiography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70657-9_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics