Skip to main content

Clinical Trials in Bladder and Upper Tract Cancer – Bladder Cancer Disease States

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Bladder Cancer
  • 1005 Accesses

Abstract

One of the many challenges in clinical trial design is identifying the target patient population for a particular intervention and designing a set of inclusion criteria that are accurate and verifiable. Randomized trials stratified by progression risk and presence or absence of papillary disease or carcinoma in situ (CIS) can include heterogeneous patient populations whereas single-arm trials require CIS at entry in order to determine efficacy of an experimental treatment. In muscle invasive cancer, there are multiple challenges in defining endpoints for approval for trials testing neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies. Recent approvals of five checkpoint inhibitors and the recent approval of an FGFR inhibitor for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease have segmented this patient population into multiple disease states depending on prior treatment and whether or not they are eligible to receive cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moschini M, et al. Incidence and effect of variant histology on oncological outcomes in patients with bladder cancer treated with radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. 2017;35(6):335–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ku JH, et al. Prognostication in patients treated with radical cystectomy for urothelial bladder carcinoma: a new simplified model incorporating histological variants. Bladder Cancer. 2018;4(2):195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Choi W, et al. Identification of distinct basal and luminal subtypes of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with different sensitivities to frontline chemotherapy. Cancer Cell. 2014;25(2):152–65.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim J, et al. The cancer genome atlas expression subtypes stratify response to checkpoint inhibition in advanced urothelial cancer and identify a subset of patients with high survival probability. Eur Urol. 2019;75(6):961–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Seiler R, et al. Impact of molecular subtypes in muscle-invasive bladder cancer on predicting response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Urol. 2017;72(4):544–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jarow JP, et al. Clinical trial design for the development of new therapies for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer: report of a Food and Drug Administration and American Urological Association public workshop. Urology. 2014;83(2):262–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lerner SP, et al. Clarification of bladder cancer disease states following treatment of patients with intravesical BCG. Bladder Cancer. 2015;1(1):29–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. BCG-unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer: developing drugs and biologics for treatment – guidance for industry, U.F.a.D. Association, Editor. 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jarow J, et al. Development of systemic and topical drugs to treat non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Bladder Cancer. 2015;1(2):133–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Babjuk M, et al. European association of urology guidelines on non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (TaT1 and Carcinoma In Situ) – 2019 Update. Eur Urol. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chang SS, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: AUA/SUO guideline. J Urol. 2016;196(4):1021–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Robins D, et al. Outcomes following clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder in patients refusing radical cystectomy. Urology. 2018;111:116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sternberg CN, et al. Can patient selection for bladder preservation be based on response to chemotherapy? Cancer. 2003;97(7):1644–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chang SS, et al. Treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: AUA/ASCO/ASTRO/SUO guideline. J Urol. 2017;198(3):552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giacalone NJ, et al. Long-term outcomes after bladder-preserving tri-modality therapy for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: an updated analysis of the Massachusetts General Hospital Experience. Eur Urol. 2017;71(6):952–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth P. Lerner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lerner, S.P. (2021). Clinical Trials in Bladder and Upper Tract Cancer – Bladder Cancer Disease States. In: Kamat, A.M., Black, P.C. (eds) Bladder Cancer. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70645-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70646-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics