Skip to main content

General Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automating Linguistics

Part of the book series: History of Computing ((HC))

  • 348 Accesses

Abstract

In conclusion, it is worthwhile to take up some theoretical issues that result from reading the history of Natural Language Processing, as the history of recent past. The appearance of machine translation as an event in the context of war has hastened the process of automation without that process being a continuation of a specific linguistic or intellectual tradition. The point of view I have adopted, that is, to study the modes of integration of machine translation, computational linguistics, information theory and information retrieval into linguistics, raises the issue of the relationship between horizon of retrospection and tradition; between institutional history and history of linguistic ideas; and the stakes of a unique periodisation for such a short history; finally, it would be worth determining whether we should speak of a revolution or of a new mode of historicity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Ronan Le Roux’s work on the convergence between cybernetics and structuralisms, most notably in Lévi-Strauss’s and Lacan’s works (Le Roux 2009, 2013).

  2. 2.

    In this case, institutional history puts forward the interaction of the sociological component with the practical component (the development of machine translation systems) which should be analysed first before the theoretical component (see the model of sciences proposed by Auroux 1987).

  3. 3.

    For a criticism of such a model, see Auroux (1987).

  4. 4.

    “Sometimes called the fallacy of nunc pro tunc, it (the fallacy of presentism) is the mistaken idea that the proper way to do history is to prune away the dead branches of the past, and to preserve the green buds and twigs which have grown into the dark forest of our contemporary world” (Fischer 1970, p.136).

  5. 5.

    Such parallels have been drawn between universal languages schemes of the seventeenth century in Great Britain (Cram 1985) and the revival of interest they aroused as machine translation methods.

  6. 6.

    Alternation of short cycles, the ephemeral nature of research and its damaging effects on knowledge accumulation had been pointed out by some researchers as early as the 1990s (see Victorri 1995).

  7. 7.

    On the 23rd of June 2009, during the ceremony celebrating the 50th anniversary of ATALA, a German NLP representative claimed that the current dominant trend in MT was based on statistical methods, while at the same time and at the same place, the American representative claimed that it was rule-based methods which were on the rise, without any of them referring to the other.

Bibliography

  • Auroux, S. 1987. Histoire des sciences et entropie des systèmes scientifiques. Les horizons de retrospection. In Zur Theorie und Methode der Geschichtsschreibung der Linguistik, ed. P. Schmitter, 20–42. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. La révolution technologique de la grammatisation. Liège: Mardaga.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. La question de l’origine des langues (suivi de L’historicité des sciences). Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Mathématisation de la linguistique et nature du langage. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 31 (1): 5–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cram, D. 1985. Universal Language Scheme in 17th century Britain. Histoire Épistémologie Langage 7 (2): 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D.H. 1970. Historians’ Fallacies. Towards a Logic of Historical Thought. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartog, F. 2003. Régimes d’historicité. Présentisme et expériences du temps. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Roux, R. 2009. Lévi-Strauss, une réception paradoxale de la cybernétique (avec une réponse de Cl. Lévi-Strauss). L’Homme, Éditions EHESS189: 65–190

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Structuralisme(s) et cybernétique(s). Lévi-Strauss, Lacan et les mathématiciens. In Les dossiers de HEL (Histoire Épistémologie Langage) 3 Les structuralismes linguistiques, ed. C. Puech. Problèmes d’historiographie comparée. http://htl.linguist.univ-paris-diderot.fr/hel/dossiers/numero3

  • Victorri, B. 1995. Les enjeux de l’implémentation informatique de modèles linguistiques. In Langage et sciences humaines: propos croisés, ed. S. Robert, 79–95. Berne: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Léon, J. (2021). General Conclusion. In: Automating Linguistics. History of Computing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70642-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70642-5_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70641-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70642-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics