Skip to main content

Serious Games and Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Chronic Stroke: Both Sides Rehabilitation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of disability in the world. It may leave several sequels such as the reduction of the function of the upper limbs, which directly affects the performance of activities of daily living. This dysfunction can be closely linked to the spasticity and the decrease in range of motion, impacting the quality of life of these patients. In this sense, a training protocol was applied involving a serious game based on virtual reality (VR), in order to facilitate the return of the neurological motor function. This treatment was applied on the two upper limbs of an individual who had a stroke in both sides of the brain. Fifteen treatment sessions were applied and the individual was evaluated in the first and last session. The evaluated parameters were: Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Range of Motion (ROM), Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold (TSRT) and Quality of Life (QoL). It was possible to observe that, the offered protocol was able to reach the objective, since the presented results indicated an improvement in the parameters evaluated in the research. Emphasizing that the game scenario and the applied protocol helped in the involvement and improvement of the participant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Johnson CO, Nguyen M, Roth GA et al (2019) Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. Lancet Neurol 18:439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Yan L L, Li C, Chen J et al (2017) Stroke. In: Disease control priorities, vol 5, 3rd edn. Cardiovascular, Respiratory, and Related Disorders; The World Bank pp 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stinear CM, Lang CE, Zeiler S et al (2020) Advances and challenges in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(19)30415-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehead S, Baalbergen E (2019) Post-stroke rehabilitation. SAMJ S Afr Med J. https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i2.00011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brewer L, Horgan F, Hickey A et al (2013) Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies. QJM

    Google Scholar 

  6. Veerbeek JM, Langbroek-Amersfoort AC, Van Wegen EEH et al (2017) Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke. Neurorehab Neural Re. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968316666957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Norouzi-Gheidari N, Archambault PS, Fung J (2012) Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. https://doi.org/10.1682/jrrd.2010.10.0210

  8. Lance J (1980) Spasticity: disorder of motor control

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baricich A, Picelli A, Molteni F et al (2016) Post-stroke spasticity as a condition: A new perspective on patient evaluation. Funct Neurol. https://doi.org/10.11138/FNeur/2016.31.3.179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Warland A, Paraskevopoulos I, Tsekleves E et al (2019) The feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy of a low-cost, virtual-reality based, upper-limb stroke rehabilitation device: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil 41:2119–2134. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1459881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laver KE, George S, Thomas S et al (2015) Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd008349.pub3

  12. Postolache O, Cary F, Girao PS, Duarte N (2016) Physiotherapy assessment based on Kinect and mobile APPs. In: Proceedings of the IISA 2015—6th international conference on information, intelligence, systems and applications

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bohannon RW, Smith MB (1987) Escala modificada de ashworth. Phisical Therapy

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aloraini S M, Gäverth J, Yeung E et al (2015) Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2015.1014933

  15. Silva M B, Silva A N, Naves E L M et al (2017) An improved approach for measuring the tonic stretch reflex response of spastic muscles. Comput Biol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.001

  16. Germanotta M, Taborri J, Rossi S et al (2017) Spasticity Measurement Based on Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold in Children with Cerebral Palsy Using the PediAnklebot. Front Hum Neurosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00277

  17. Marques IA, Silva MB, Silva AN et al (2017) Measurement of post-stroke spasticity based on tonic stretch reflex threshold: implications of stretch velocity for clinical practice. Disabil Rehabil. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2017.1381183

  18. Levin M F, Feldman A G (1994) The role of stretch reflex threshold regulation in normal and impaired motor control. Brain Res DOI 10.1016/0006-8993(94)90949-0

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fernandes C G. (2019) Harpy Game: um jogo sério customizável com interface multimodal

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sathiyanarayanan M, Rajan S (2016) MYO Armband for physiotherapy healthcare: a case study using gesture recognition application. In: Proceedings of the 2016 8th international conference on communication systems and networks (COMSNETS), pp 1–6. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  21. Marques I (2019) Jogo sério e realidade virtual na reabilitação do AVC crônico: protocolo individualizado, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

    Google Scholar 

  22. Santospagnuolo A, Bruno AA, Pagnoni A et al (2019) Validity and reliability of the GYKO inertial sensor system for the assessment of the elbow range of motion. J Sport Med Phys Fit 59:1466–1471. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09331-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ang WS, Geyer H, Chen IM, Ang WT (2018) Objective assessment of spasticity with a method based on a human upper limb model. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabilitation Eng 26:1414–1423. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2018.2821197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Silva AN, Silva MB, Marques IA et al (2014) Proposal of a real-time computational tool for the measurement of spasticity in stroke patients. In: Proceedings of the ISSNIP biosignals and biorobotics conference, BRC

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kim KS, Seo JH, Song CG (2011) Portable measurement system for the objective evaluation of the spasticity of hemiplegic patients based on the tonic stretch reflex threshold. Med Eng Phys 33:62–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2010.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alves CM (2019) Desenvolvimento e aplicação de um equipamento para avaliação da espasticidade pelo método limiar do reflexo de estiramento tônico, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia

    Google Scholar 

  27. Williams LS, Weinberger M, Harris LE et al (1999) Development of a stroke-specific quality of life scale. Stroke. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.7.1362

  28. Muus I, Williams LS, Ringsberg KC (2007) Validation of the stroke specific quality of life scale (SS-QOL): test of reliability and validity of the danish version (SS-QOL-DK). Clin Rehabil https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215507075504

  29. Sheean G, McGuire J R (2009) Spastic hypertonia and movement disorders: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and quantification. PM R. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.08.00

  30. Fleuren JFM, Voerman GE, Erren-Wolters CV et al (2010) Stop using the ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosur Ps 81:46–52. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2009.177071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaya T, Goksel Karatepe A, Gunaydin R et al (2011) Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Ashworth Scale and modified Modified Ashworth Scale in assessing poststroke elbow flexor spasticity. Int J Rehabil Res https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833d6cdf

  32. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, van Wegen EEH, Wolf SL (2015) Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke. Lancet Neurol https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70160-7

  33. Saurav K, Dash A, Solanki D et al (2018) Design of a VR-based upper limb gross motor and fine motor task platform for post-stroke survivors. In: Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACIS 17th international conference on computer and information science (ICIS), pp 252–257. IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  34. House G, Burdea G, Polistico K et al (2016) A Rehabilitation First - Tournament Between Teams of Nursing Home Residents with Chronic Stroke. Games Health J. https://doi.org/10.1089/g4h.2015.0072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Calota A, Feldman AG, Levin MF (2008) Spasticity measurement based on tonic stretch reflex threshold in stroke using a portable device. Clin Neurophysiol 119:2329–2337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.07.215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carregosa AA, Aguiar dos Santos LR, Masruha MR et al (2018) Virtual rehabilitation through nintendo wii in poststroke patients: follow-up. J. Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 27:494–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSTROKECEREBROVASDIS.2017.09.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Towfighi A, Ovbiagele B, El Husseini N et al (2017) Poststroke depression: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the american heart association/american stroke association. Stroke 48:e30–e43. https://doi.org/10.1161/STR.0000000000000113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the participant for his selfless participation, CAPES and FAPEMIG. None of this would be possible without their collaboration.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alves, C.M., Rezende, A.R., Marques, I.A., Silva, D.C., Paiva, T.S., Naves, E.L.M. (2022). Serious Games and Virtual Reality in the Treatment of Chronic Stroke: Both Sides Rehabilitation. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics