Skip to main content

Neuromorphic Vision-aided Semi-autonomous System for Prosthesis Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 56 Accesses

Abstract

In the last years, several works have searched better ways to perform upper-limb prosthesis control. However, current prosthesis control methods are still far from achieving the human limb features, like controlling many degrees of freedom mechanically. Moreover, the complexity of prosthesis control increases the user’s cognitive load, which decreases its usability and user satisfaction rates. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance upper-limb prosthesis control systems for facilitating their control. This work presents an alternative method, which works with the neuromorphic vision to automatize both wrist rotation and grasp selection, according to object orientation and shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie E, Ephraim P, Travison T, Brookmeyer R (2008) Estimating the Prevalence of Limb Loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Phys Med Rehabil 89:422–429

    Google Scholar 

  2. Data SUS at http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sih/cnv/qiuf.def

  3. Number of upper and lower limb amputations performed each year by the NHS in Scotland from 1981 to 2013 at https://nhsnss.org

  4. Owings M, Kozak L (1998) Ambulatory and Inpatient Procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Stat 89:422–429

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kejlaa G (1993) Consumer concerns and the functional value of prostheses to upper limb amputees. Prosthet Orthot Int 17:157–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cordella F et al (2016) Literature review on needs of upper limb prosthesis users. Front Neurosci 10:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Østlie K, Lesjø I, Franklin R, Garfelt B, Skjeldal O, Magnus P (2012) Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 7:294–303

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maat B, Smit G, Plettenburg D, Breedveld P (2018) Passive prosthetic hands and tools: a literature review. Prosthet Orthot Int 42:66–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bebionic dexterous hand at https://www.ottobockus.com

  10. i-Limb Dexterous Hand at https://www.ossur.com.br

  11. Shadow dexterous hand at https://www.shadowrobot.com

  12. White M, Zhang W, Winslow A et al (2017) Usability comparison of conventional direct control versus pattern recognition control of transradial prostheses. IEEE Trans Hum Mach Syst 47:1146–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Biddiss E, Chau T (2007) Upper-Limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 86:977–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sartori L, Camperio-Ciani A, Bulgheroni M, Castiello U (2015) Intersegmental coordination in the kinematics of prehension movements of macaques. PLoS One. 10:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dosen S, Cipriani C, Kostić M, Controzzi M, Controzzi MC, Popović DB (2010) Cognitive vision system for control of dexterous prosthetic hands: experimental evaluation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 7:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Markovic M, Dosen S, Cipriani C, Popovic D, Farina D (2014) Stereovision and augmented reality for closed-loop control of grasping in hand prostheses. J Neural Eng 11:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hays M, Osborn L, Ghosh R, Iskarous M, Hunt C, Thakor NV (2019) Neuromorphic vision and tactile fusion for upper limb prosthesis control. In: 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lichtsteiner P, Posch C, Delbruck T (2008) A 128\(\times \) 128 120 dB 15 \(\mu \)s Latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor. IEEE J Solid-State Circ 43:566–576

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gallego G, Delbrück T, Orchard G et al (2019) Event-based vision: a survey. CoRR abs/1904.08405

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ghazaei G, Alameer A, Degenaar P, Morgan G, Nazarpour K (2017) Deep learning-based artificial vision for grasp classification in myoelectric hands. J Neural Eng 14:1–18

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the funding agencies CNPq, CAPES, and FAPEMIG for the support and the Federal University of Uberlandia for providing the necessary space and resources.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. L. Gouveia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Gouveia, E.L., Gouveia, E.B., Silva, A.N., Soares, A.B. (2022). Neuromorphic Vision-aided Semi-autonomous System for Prosthesis Control. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_336

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_336

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics