Abstract
Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is an invasive stimulation technique through which it is possible to excitate and inhibit the activity of neurons from different cortical regions. The ICMS has been used in the context of neural prostheses targeting the restoration of neurological functions and as possible tactile feedback in brain-machine interfaces. Several protocols of microstimulation have been implemented to stimulate the primary somatosensory cortex (S1). The literature describes the direct effects of ICMS upon the activity of neurons in the stimulated area, though the distribution of the neuronal activity and the indirect effects of that stimulation, that is, those that occur far from the stimulated area, are still not fully described. This study aimed to evaluate the immediate effects of the ICMS on c-Fos cell immunoreactivity upon the stimulated area and the extent of this stimulation in S1, adjacent cortical areas, and also in the spinal cord of rats. It was observed that surrounding the microelectrode implant occurred a lower immunoreactivity extending to \(150{-}200\ \upmu \)m\(^{2}\), however, there was no statistical significance to right and left directions (X\(^{2}\)(4) = 5.00, p = 0.29; X\(^{2}\)(4) = 6.33, p = 0.18). It was followed by a higher number of c-Fos immunoreactive cells between \(250{-}1000\ \upmu \)m from the microelectrode track at the mediolateral directions, being statistically significant to \(500\ \upmu \)m at the rostroventral direction (F(2, 6) = 6.57, p = 0.031). Despite the qualitative differences in the number of immunoreactive cells, no statistically significant differences were observed to M1, S2, and spinal cord areas. This study corroborates with findings of previous research relative to the extent of neuronal activity and immunoreactivity after ICMS, adding that similar patterns of cortical immunoreactivity are seen in non-anesthetized stimulated animals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Venkatraman S, Carmena J (2011) Active sensing of target location encoded by cortical microstimulation. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 19:317–324
Voigt MB, Hubka P, Kral A (2017) Intracortical microstimulation differentially activates cortical layers based on stimulation depth. Brain Stimul 10:684–694
Dagnelie G (2008) Psychophysical evaluation for visual prosthesis. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 10:339–368
Fallon J, Irvine D, Shepherd R (2008) Cochlear implants and brain plasticity. Hearing Res 238:110–117
Urdaneta M, Koivuniemi A, Otto K (2017) Central nervous system microstimulation: towards selective micro-neuromodulation. Curr Opini Biomed Eng 4:65–77
Venkatraman S, Elkabany K, Long JD, Yao Y, Carmena JM (2008) A system for neural recording and closed-loop intracortical microstimulation in awake rodents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 56:15–22
O’Doherty J, Lebedev M, Hanson T, Fitzsimmons N, Nicolelis M (2009) A brain-machine interface instructed by direct intracortical microstimulation. Front Integr Neurosci 3:20
Bensmaia S (2015) Biological and bionic hands: natural neural coding and artificial perception. Philos Trans R Soc B: Biol Sci 370:20140209
Dadarlat M, O’doherty J, Sabes P (2015) A learning-based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration. Nat Neurosci 18:138
Tabot G, Dammann J, Berg J et al (2013) Restoring the sense of touch with a prosthetic hand through a brain interface. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:18279–18284
Berg J, Dammann J III, Tenore F et al (2013) Behavioral demonstration of a somatosensory neuroprosthesis. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 21:500–507
Bensmaia S, Miller L (2014) Restoring sensorimotor function through intracortical interfaces: progress and looming challenges. Nat Rev Neurosci 15:313
Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Salinas E (1998) Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation. Nature 392:387
Romo R, Hernandez A, Zainos A, Brody CD, Lemus L (2000) Sensing without touching: psychophysical performance based on cortical microstimulation. Neuron 26:273–278
Kim S, Callier T, Tabot G, Gaunt R, Tenore F, Bensmaia S (2015) Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:15202–15207
Johnson L, Wander J, Sarma D, Su D, Fetz E, Ojemann J (2013) Direct electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex in humans using electrocorticography electrodes: a qualitative and quantitative report. J Neural Eng 10:036021
Flesher S, Collinger J, Foldes S, et al (2016) Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex. Sci Transl Medic 8:361ra141–361ra141
Pais-Vieira M, Lebedev M, Kunicki C, Wang J, Nicolelis M (2013) A brain-to-brain interface for real-time sharing of sensorimotor information. Sci Rep 3:1319
Watson M, Dancause N, Sawan M (2015) Efficient microstimulation of the brain: a parametric approach. In: 2015 37th Annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society (EMBC). IEEE, pp 2155–2158
Watson M, Dancause N, Sawan M (2016) Intracortical microstimulation parameters dictate the amplitude and latency of evoked responses. Brain Stimul 9:276–284
Fox K (2008) Barrel cortex, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Histed M, Ni A, Maunsell J (2013) Insights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments. Prog Neurobiol 103:115–130
Butovas S, Schwarz C (2003) Spatiotemporal effects of microstimulation in rat neocortex: a parametric study using multielectrode recordings. J Neurophysiol 90:3024–3039
Tehovnik E, Slocum W (2007) What delay fields tell us about striate cortex. J Neurophysiol 98:559–576
Benali A, Weiler E, Benali Y, Dinse H, Eysel U (2008) Excitation and inhibition jointly regulate cortical reorganization in adult rats. J Neurosci 28:12284–12293
Diamond M, Von Heimendahl M, Knutsen P M, Kleinfeld D, Ahissar E. ‘Where’ and ‘what’ in the whisker sensorimotor system. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:601
Paxinos G, Watson C (2007) The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates, 6th edn. Academic Press, Londres
Histed M, Bonin V, Reid C (2009) Direct activation of sparse, distributed populations of cortical neurons by electrical microstimulation. Neuron 63:508–522
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Santos Dumont Institute, Brazilian Ministry of Education (MEC) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Costa, V.S., Suassuna, A.O.B., Galdino, L., Kunicki, A.C. (2022). Immediate Cortical and Spinal C-Fos Immunoreactivity After ICMS of the Primary Somatosensory Cortex in Rats. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_330
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_330
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)