Skip to main content

Method for Improved Image Reconstruction in Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography, Based on Compressive Sensing with Prefiltering in the Frequency Domain

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET) allow many types of diagnoses and medical analyses to be performed, as well as patient monitoring in different treatment scenarios. Therefore, they are among the most important medical imaging modalities, both in clinical applications and in scientific research. However, both methods lead to radiation exposure, associated to the X-rays, used in the CT case, and to the chemical contrast that inserts a radioactive isotope into the patient’s body, in the PET case. It is possible to reduce the amount of radiation needed to attain a specified quality in these imaging techniques by using compressive sensing (CS), which reduces the number of measurements required for signal and image reconstruction, compared to standard approaches such as filtered backprojection. In this paper, we propose and evaluate a new method for the reconstruction of CT and PET images based on CS with prefiltering in the frequency domain. We start by estimating frequency-domain measurements based on the acquired sinograms. Next, we perform a prefiltering in the frequency domain to favor the sparsity required by CS and improve the reconstruction of filtered versions of the image. Based on the reconstructed filtered images, a final composition stage leads to the complete image using the spectral information from the individual filtered versions. We compared the proposed method to the standard filtered backprojection technique, commonly used in CT and PET. The results suggest that the proposed method can lead to images with significantly higher signal-to-error ratios for a specified number of measurements, both for CT (p = 8.8324e-05) and PET (p = 4.7377e-09).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Markoe A (2006) Analytic tomography. Encyclopedia of mathematics and its applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Halperin EC, Wazer DE, Perez CA, Brady LW (2018) Perez & Brady’s principles and practice of radiation oncology. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (LWW), 7th edn

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rubin GD (2014) Computed tomography: revolutionizing the practice of medicine for 40 years. Radiology 273:181–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chiffre L, Carmignato S, Kruth J et al (2014) Industrial applications of computed tomography. CIRP Ann 63:655–677

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryan RN (2009) Introduction to the science of medical imaging. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  6. Donnan GA, Ma H, Mohr JP, In: Mohr J, Choi D et al (eds) Overview of laboratory studies in stroke, 4th edn. Churchill Liv. 978-0-443-06600-9

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kurle P, Rutecki P (2010) Seizures and epilepsy. In: Rolak LA (ed) Neurology secrets, 5th edn. Mosby, Philadelphia, pp 315–339

    Google Scholar 

  8. D’Ascenzo N, Antonecchia E, Gao M et al (2020) Evaluation of a digital brain PET scanner based on the plug imaging sensor technology. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 4:327–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284 PMID: 18046031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner DJ, Doll R, Head DT et al (2003) Good. Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. In: Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, vol 100

    Google Scholar 

  11. Seeram E (2001) Computed tomography: physical principles, clinical applications, and quality control. Saunders, W.B

    Google Scholar 

  12. Miosso CJ, Borries R, Pierluissi JH (2013) Compressive sensing with prior information: requirements and probabilities of reconstruction in l1-minimization. IEEE Trans Sig Process 61:2150–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Miosso CJ, Borries R, Pierluissi JH (2009) Compressive sensing method for improved reconstruction of gradient-sparse magnetic resonance images. In: 2009 conference record of the forty-third Asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers, pp 799–806

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lustig M (2008) Sparse MRI. PhD thesis. Stanford University, Department of Electrical Engineering

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miosso CJ (2010) Compressive sensing with prior information applied to magnetic resonance imaging. Ph.D. thesis, University of Texas at El Paso—UTEP, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, TX

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lima JA, Miosso CJ, Farias MC, Borries R (2018) Evaluation of different types of filters in magnetic resonance imaging using compressive sensing with pre-filtering. EMBC 2018, HI, USA, July 18–21, 2018, 5575–5578

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kak AC, Slaney M (2001) Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, PA

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Boor C (2001) A practical guide to splines, Revised edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miosso CJ, Borries R, Argaez M et al (2009) Compressive sensing reconstruction with prior information by iteratively reweighted least-squares. IEEE Trans Sig 57:2424–2431

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ackerman MJ (1998) The visible human project. Proc IEEE 86:504–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Qure.ai . Non-contrast head/brain CT CQ500 dataset. Creative commons attribution-noncommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 international license. Available at http://headctstudy.qure.ai/. Last access: June 13th 2020

  22. Albertina B, Watson M, Holback C, Jarosz R et al (2016) Radiology data from the cancer genome atlas lung adenocarcinoma [TCGA-LUAD] collection 2016. The Cancer Imaging Archive. https://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2016.JGNIHEP5

  23. Neuroimaging Institute, Southern California Informatics Keck School. LONI Image and Data Archive 2019. https://ida.loni.usc.edu/

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y. Garcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Garcia, Y., Franco, C., Miosso, C.J. (2022). Method for Improved Image Reconstruction in Computed Tomography and Positron Emission Tomography, Based on Compressive Sensing with Prefiltering in the Frequency Domain. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_295

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_295

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics