Skip to main content

Measurement Techniques of Hounsfield Unit Values for Assessment of Bone Quality Following Decompressive Craniectomy (DC): A Preliminary Report

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how skull density behaves after decompressive craniectomy (DC) through Hounsfield Unit (HU) quantification (Hounsfield in J Comput Assist Tomogr 4(5):665–674 [1]). The margins of the bones of the frontal and occipital regions adjacent to the decompressive craniectomy and the opposite regions without surgery in the early and late stages were analyzed. In the immediate postoperative period, higher bone density values were found at the margin without craniectomy in the frontal bone (12.5–32.28%) and this difference decreased in the late phase (0.53–15.74%) and in the occipital bone. The maximum density values were higher at the margin of the decompressive craniectomy in both the early and late stages. These informations can help the neurosurgeon about changes in the bone quality of the skull following the surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hounsfield GN (1979/1980) Computed medical imaging. Nobel lecture, 8 Dec 1979. J Comput Assist Tomogr 4(5):665–674

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hutchinson P, Timofeev I, Kirkpatrick P (2007) Surgery for brain edema. Neurosurg Focus 22(5):e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lanzino DJ, Lanzino G (2000) Decompressive craniectomy for space-occupying supratentorial infarction: rationale, indications and outcome. Neurosurg Focus 8(5):e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schirmer CM, Hoit DA, Malek AM (2007) Decompressive hemicraniectomy for the treatment of intractable intracranial hypertension after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke 38(3):987–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nerlich A, Peschel O, Zink A, Rösing FW (2003) The pathology of trepanation: differential diagnosis, healing and dry bone appearance in modern cases. In: Arnott R, Finger S, Smith CUM (eds) Trepanation: history, discovery, theory. Swets & Zeitlinger Publications, Lisse, pp 43–51

    Google Scholar 

  6. González-Darder JM (2019) Trepanation, Trephining and craniotomy. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22212-3

  7. Narayanan A, Cai A, Xi Y, Maalouf NM, Rubin C, Chhabra A (2019) CT bone density analysis of low-impact proximal femur fractures using Hounsfield units. Clin Imaging 57:15–20

    Google Scholar 

  8. Scheyerer MJ, Ullrich B, Osterhoff G, Spiegl UA, Schnake KJ (2019) Arbeitsgruppe Osteoporotische Frakturen der Sektion Wirbelsäule der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. [Hounsfield units as a measure of bone density-applications in spine surgery]. Unfallchirurg 122(8):654–661

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zaidi Q, Danisa OA, Cheng W (2019) Measurement techniques and utility of Hounsfield Unit values for assessment of bone quality prior to spinal instrumentation: a review of current literature. Spine 44(4):239–244

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waterval JJ, van Dongen TM, Stokroos RJ, De Bondt BJ, Chenault MN, Manni JJ (2012) Imaging features and progression of hyperostosis cranialis interna. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 33(3):453–461. https://doi.org/10.3174/AJNR.A2830

  11. Yamada K, Endo S, Yoshioka S, Hatazawa J, Yamaura H, Matsuzawa T (1982) Age-related changes of the cranial bone mineral: a quantitative study with computed tomography. J Am Geriatr Soc 30(12):756–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Silvio Tacara .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tacara, S., de Faria, R.A., Coninck, J.C., Schelin, H.R., Nakano, I.T. (2022). Measurement Techniques of Hounsfield Unit Values for Assessment of Bone Quality Following Decompressive Craniectomy (DC): A Preliminary Report. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_294

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_294

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics