Skip to main content

Microstate Graphs: A Node-Link Approach to Identify Patients with Schizophrenia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 83))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 104 Accesses

Abstract

An accurate identification of schizophrenia is important for its early diagnosis and treatment. Due to the complexity and inherent heterogeneity of this disorder, an accurate marker has not been established yet. In this paper is proposed a new methodology for the detection of schizophrenia using EEG microstate analysis and graph theory. The proposed method, called Microstate Graphs, allows modeling and interpreting each microstate as a complex network, which permits to identify the effect of schizophrenia on some characteristics of the built networks. In an experiment carried out in a public dataset, the proposed method was useful to identify schizophrenic patients with an accuracy of (\(91.67 \pm 2.06 \))% using an MLP trained with metrics extracted from microstate networks: assortativity, small-worldness, and local efficiency, indicating that the proposed method is promising.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bellack Alan S, Green Michael F, Cook Judith A et al (2007) Assessment of community functioning in people With schizophrenia and other severe mental illnesses: a white paper based on an NIMH-sponsored workshop. Schizophrenia Bull 33:805–822

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hofer A, Rettenbacher MA, Widschwendter CG, Kemmler G, Hummer M, Fleischhacker WW (2006) Correlates of subjective and functional outcomes in outpatient clinic attendees with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder. 256:246–255

    Google Scholar 

  3. Christina A, Faber Pascal L, Gregor L et al (2014) Resting-state connectivity in the prodromal phase of schizophrenia: insights from EEG microstates. Schizophrenia Res 152:513–520

    Google Scholar 

  4. Patel Krishna R, Jessica C, Kunj G, Dylan A (2014) Schizophrenia: overview and treatment options. Pharmacy Therapeutics 39:638

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shim M, Hwang H-J, Kim D-W, Lee S-H, Im C-H (2016) Machine-learning-based diagnosis of schizophrenia using combined sensor-level and source-level EEG features. Schizophrenia Res 176:314–319

    Google Scholar 

  6. Boris D, Alexandra P, Alexander K (2016) Binary classification of multi-channel EEG records based on the \(\epsilon \)-complexity of continuous vector functions. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 152

    Google Scholar 

  7. Alimardani F, Cho J, Boostani R, Hwang H (2018) Classification of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia using steady-state visual evoked potential based features. IEEE Access 6:40379–40388

    Google Scholar 

  8. Phang C-R, Ting C-M, Samdin SB, Hernando O (2019) Classification of EEG-based effective brain connectivity in schizophrenia using deep neural networks. In: 2019 9th international IEEE/EMBS conference on neural engineering (NER). IEEE, pp 401–406

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kathryn R, Laura DH, Anja B, Thomas K (2016) 15 years of microstate research in schizophrenia—where are we? A meta-analysis. Front Psych 7:22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lehmann D, Ozaki H, Pal I (1987) EEG alpha map series: brain micro-states by space-oriented adaptive segmentation. Electroencephalography Clin Neurophysiol 67:271–288

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pascual-Marqui Roberto D, Michel Christoph M, Dietrich L (1995) Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 42:658–665

    Google Scholar 

  12. Arjun K, Alvaro P-L, Michel CM, Faranak F (2015) Microstates in resting-state EEG: current status and future directions. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 49:105–113

    Google Scholar 

  13. García-Laredo E (2018) Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: description and cognitive familiar endophenotypes. Biopsych Rel Perspecti Rev Literature Psych 43

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tripathi A, Sujita Kumar K, Rashmi S (2018) Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: understanding the biological correlates and remediation strategies. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 16:7

    Google Scholar 

  15. Borisov SV (2005) Alexander K, Gorbachevskaia NL, Kozlova IA (2005) Analysis of EEG structural synchrony in adolescents with schizophrenic disorders. Human Physiol 31:255–261

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trier PA, Andreas P, Nicolas L, Kai HL (2018) Microstate EEGlab toolbox: an introductory guide. bioRxiv

    Google Scholar 

  17. Karwowski W, Farzad VF, Nichole L (2019) Application of graph theory for identifying connectivity patterns in human brain networks: a systematic review. Front Neurosci 13:585

    Google Scholar 

  18. Michel Christoph M, Thomas K (2017) EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: a review

    Google Scholar 

  19. Telesford Qawi K, Simpson Sean L, Burdette Jonathan H, Satoru H, Laurienti Paul J (2011) The brain as a complex system: using network science as a tool for understanding the brain. Brain Connectivity 1:295–308

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fabrizio V, Francesca M, Maria RP (2017) Connectome: graph theory application in functional brain network architecture. Clin Neurophysiol Practice 2:206–213

    Google Scholar 

  21. De Vico FF, Luciano FC, Aparecido RF et al (2010) A graph-theoretical approach in brain functional networks. Possible implications in EEG studies. Nonlinear Biomed Phys 4:S8

    Google Scholar 

  22. Alireza B, Mostafa H, Ahmed N, El Ashal G (2015) Part 1: simple definition and calculation of accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. Emergency 3:48–49

    Google Scholar 

  23. Telesford Qawi K et al (2011) The ubiquity of small-world networks. Brain Connectivity 1:367–375

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the National Mental Health Center of the Russian Academy of Medical Sciences for providing the database, and the Postgraduate Program in Electrical Engineering—UFES. This research received financial support from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Espírito Santo (FAPES), number 598/2018.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorraine Marques Alves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Alves, L.M., Côco, K.F., de Souza, M.L., Ciarelli, P.M. (2022). Microstate Graphs: A Node-Link Approach to Identify Patients with Schizophrenia. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_245

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_245

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics