Skip to main content

Evaluation of Hyperelastic Constitutive Models Applied to Airway Stents Made by a 3D Printer

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering (CBEB 2020)

Abstract

The present work aims to make a proof of concept comparing mechanical tests in a commercial model of airway stent (HCPA-1) versus experimental and virtual simulation mechanical tests using finite elements in a dimensionally similar stent made by a 3D printer in flexible non-biocompatible material. The material of the 3D printed stent was hyperelastically characterized from experimental mechanical tests on samples that allowed calculating the constitutive constants for the hyperelastic models. Virtual simulations of mechanical tests using finite element analysis in the ANSYS software with the available hyperelastic models were compared with the experimental tests, obtaining the precision of the hyperelastic models in the material used to print the stent. A cough-like mechanical test was performed experimentally on HCPA-1 and 3D printed stents simulating a critical condition of use. The results were compared with a virtual simulation using the hyperelastic models obtaining precision that varied from 2.5 to 280% depending on the hyperelastic model used. The work shows that it is possible to obtain virtually the mechanical response of an airway stent using finite elements. Making it possible to minimize the time and financial investment needed to evaluate the research and development of new materials, geometries or customized models based on medical images using the 3D printing technique. Flexible and biocompatible materials for the 3D printer should emerge in the future. Allowing 3D printing of implantable airway stents in patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 509.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barros Casas D, Fernandez-Bussy S, Folch E (2014) Nonmalignant central airway obstruction. Arch Bronconeumol 50:345–354

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schweiger T, Gildea TR, Prosch H, Lang G, Klepetko W, Hoetzenecker SO, Fleck N, Radford D (2006) The uniaxial stress versus strain response of pig skin and silicone rubber at low and high strain rates. Int J Impact Eng 32:1384–1402

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng GZ, San Jose Estepar R, Folch E (2016) Three dimensional printing and 3D slicer: powerful tools in understanding and treating structural lung disease. Chest 149:1136–1142

    Google Scholar 

  4. 3D printing of medical devices. Accessed 10 Apr 2020. https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures/3d-printing-medical-devices

  5. INCA (2018) Incidência de Câncer no Brasil para 2018. Instituto Nacional do Câncer

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meunier L, Chagnon G, Favier D, Orgéas L, Vacher P (2008) Mechanical experimental characterisation and numerical modelling of an unfilled silicone rubber. Polym Test 27:765–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vacher P, Dumoulin S, Morestin F, Mguil-Touchal S (1999) Bidimensional strain measurement using digital images. Inst Mech Eng Part C ImechE 213:811–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Favier D, Louche H, Schlosser P, Orgé L, Vacher P, Debove L (2007) Homogeneous and heterogeneous deformation mechanisms in an austenitic polycrystalline Ti-50.8 at.% Ni thin tube under tension. Investigation via temperature and strain fields measurements. Acta Mater 55:5310–5322

    Google Scholar 

  9. Giton M, Caro-Bretelle A-S, Ienny P (2006) Hyperelastic behaviour identification by forward problem resolution: application to a tear test of silicone-rubber. Strain 42:291–297

    Google Scholar 

  10. Frank S (2008) Optical strain measurement by digital image analysis. Matlab. https://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/20438-optical-strain-measurement-by-digital-image-analysis. 21 Nov 2019

  11. Malvè M, del Palomar AP, López-Villalobos JL et al (2010) FSI analysis of the coughing mechanism in a human trachea. Ann Biomed Eng 38:1556–1565

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marczak RJ, Iturrioz I (2006) Caracterização do Comportamento de Materiais Hiperelásticos. Outubro

    Google Scholar 

  13. FDA. Guidance for industry and FDA staff—non-clinical engineering tests and recommended labeling for intravascular stents and associated delivery systems, document issued on: 18 Apr 2010

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. F. Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Müller, A.F. et al. (2022). Evaluation of Hyperelastic Constitutive Models Applied to Airway Stents Made by a 3D Printer. In: Bastos-Filho, T.F., de Oliveira Caldeira, E.M., Frizera-Neto, A. (eds) XXVII Brazilian Congress on Biomedical Engineering. CBEB 2020. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 83. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_132

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70601-2_132

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70600-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70601-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics