Skip to main content

Conditional Inference

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Testing Statistical Hypotheses

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Statistics ((STS))

  • 4772 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter has a somewhat different character from the preceding ones. It is concerned with problems regarding the proper choice and interpretation of tests and confidence procedures, problems which—despite a large literature—have not found a definitive solution. The discussion will thus be more tentative than in earlier chapters, and will focus on conceptual aspects more than on technical ones. Consider the situation in which either the experiment \({\mathcal {E}}\) of observing a random quantity X with density \(p_{\theta }\) (with respect to \(\mu \)) or the experiment \({\mathcal {F}}\) of observing an X with density \(q_{\theta }\) (with respect to \(\nu \)) is performed with probability p and \(q=1-p\) respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A distinction between experimental mixtures and the present situation, relying on aspects outside the model, is discussed by Basu (1964) and Kalbfleisch (1975).

  2. 2.

    The family \({\mathcal {P}}\) is then a group family; see Lehmann and Casella (1998), Section 1.3.

  3. 3.

    For a more detailed discussion of equivariance, see Lehmann and Casella (1998), Chapter 3.

  4. 4.

    So far, nonexistence has not been proved. It seems likely that a proof can be obtained by the methods of Unni (1978).

  5. 5.

    For other implications of this requirement, called the weak conditionality principle, see Birnbaum (1962) and Berger and Wolpert (1988).

  6. 6.

    For a discussion of this issue, see Buehler (1959), Robinson (1976, 1979a), and Bondar (1977).

  7. 7.

    Randomized and nonrandomized conditioning is interpreted in terms of betting strategies by Buehler (1959) and Pierce (1973).

  8. 8.

    Fisher’s contributions to this topic are discussed in Savage (1976, pp. 467–469).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph P. Romano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lehmann, E.L., Romano, J.P. (2022). Conditional Inference. In: Testing Statistical Hypotheses. Springer Texts in Statistics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70578-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics