Keywords

1 Context of the Study

The construction industry plays a key role in the global economy. Despite its importance, it is still described as less productive and innovative than other sectors. However, this situation seems to be changing and several actors have recognized the need to innovate to ensure their competitiveness. New forms of work are emerging thanks to the introduction of technologies linked to Industry 4.0 (Ind4.0). In France and Quebec, several large companies have already adopted such technologies (BIM, virtual and augmented reality, prefabrication, the Internet of Things (IoT), additive manufacturing, robotization, etc.), but their implementation is still in its infancy, particularly among small businesses. These solutions must be encouraged in order to create a true digital transformation of construction. However, companies are still reluctant, not always knowing how to proceed or prioritize and what these technologies can actually bring to them.

In order to help various partners (French and Canadian companies), we felt it necessary to shed light on recent scientific advances that link Industry 4.0 and the construction sector. Several questions emerged at the beginning of our study in June 2019. The one we will try to answer here is, “What is the relationship between Industry 4.0 and BIM? Do these concepts share the same objectives when applied to the construction sector?” To answer this question, in the following section we will first present the strategy of the systematic literature review conducted on these questions. A synthesis of the 58 selected articles is then presented in part 3. Part 4 proposes then a deeper analysis of the content, and finally the conclusion sheds light on these recent functionalities and industrial opportunities. Some of these have not been previously when it came to exploiting the BIM model alone.

2 Research Methodology

To characterize the contributions of Ind4.0 in the construc tion sector, we first provide a review of the studies on this subject published prior to June 2019. To do so, we have analyzed the scientific publications using the SCOPUS databaseFootnote 1 and post-2010 studies. The query focuses on title, abstract and author keywords on terms related to the construction sector and Ind4.0 in the broadest sense. This initial work made it possible to filter the available publications and to highlight 347 documents. In order to respond to our issue, we chose to study in detail only the articles using “allow or target or objective or aim or goal” in the title, abstract or keywords. This additional filter made it possible to keep only articles that openly claimed an intention or purpose. The 68 articles that responded to this new query and that could provide clarification to our partners are detailed and analyzed in the following section.

3 Content of the Selected Papers

After an in-depth study of the selected articles, 10 turned out to be irrelevant. The technologies tested and the experiments carried out ultimately led to many advances presented in these articles and listed in Table 1 belowFootnote 2:

Table 1. List of recognized purposes and gains.

Numerous overlaps and convergences were thus revealed. For example, items in bold in the table had an environmental intent. The following section therefore seeks to define what might be the “major families” of advances brought about by Industry 4.0 technologies in the construction sector.

4 Analysis

All of the studies selected aimed to highlight the contributions of digital technologies or approaches to the construction sector. They can be grouped and summarized in the following table. The first one, Table 2, presents the main gains noted on at least six occasions during our review and generally credited to the BIM approaches (as we had noticed in a completely different study relative to the BIM Maturity Model [2]).

Table 2. First set of observed gains.

However, the summary in Table 3 reveals six of the most frequently achieved “original” improvements to be credited to technologies such as IoT [3], drones [4], and 3D printing [5], the latter facilitating, for example, prefabrication. Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing are presented as solutions of interest in the improvement of feedback or in the automation of choices [6, 7].

Table 3. New improvements and prospects.

This final synthesis makes it possible to highlight new functions to open, in detail, new perspectives for construction companies. Indeed, more and more real-time monitoring is being studied and used. These follow-ups of objects and participants now make real-time simulations and optimization possible (for example, for flows, time or resources) [8, 9]. The monitoring of planning and the creation of a knowledge and experience database are also being tested and could be generalized [10]. These elements are therefore likely to provide new sources of interest or questioning of companies… Whereas BIM is only occasionally used by less than one third of French companies [11].

Finally, this observation opens up new research perspectives, which are described in more detail in the last part of this article.

5 Conclusions and Perspectives

This literature review first confirmed that 4.0 technologies, generally associated with the manufacturing sector, are already benefiting from some precursors of the construction industry. Among the hundreds of studies conducted by academics and companies in this sector, the sixty or so analyzed here have confirmed that the reasons for the existence of BIM (i.e., to improve productivity, communication, quality, or to reduce costs) is reinforced by all of these complementary technologies. The latter, which is increasingly robust and accessible due to their massive diffusion, also make it possible to obtain new and promising functionalities or gains, such as real-time data acquisition to increase reactivity or to optimize process and simulations. As we recall, this exceeded the expectations that had initially been set during the deployment of BIM. However, the companies we met and worked with are still hesitant and limited in terms of financial resources. This analysis now needs to be continued, and for us to become even more proactive. This is why, as with ongoing studies concerning the complementarity between LEAN and Ind4.0 [12], we will attempt to answer the following nested research questions in future collaborative work:

  1. i.

    Do the skills acquired by companies in deploying and operating BIM provide easier access to new “4.0” functionalities and gains summarized in Table 3?

  2. ii.

    Conversely, will the acquisition and mastery of new “4.0” technologies facilitate BIM implementation?

  3. iii.

    Will the two approaches soon be inseparable, BIM becoming the equivalent of the digital twin as defined by Grieves et al. for the construction sector (as already suggested by many companies today [13]) [14]?

  4. iv.

    …or will they remain without real mutual effects?

In order to answer these questions, in early 2020, we have begun major studies and support work with one of France’s leading construction companies involved in numerous rehabilitation and new construction programs in the area around Paris.