Skip to main content

Organisation of Education in Chile and Santiago

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
School Segregation and Social Cohesion in Santiago

Part of the book series: International Study of City Youth Education ((SCYE,volume 3))

  • 124 Accesses

Abstract

An analysis of the relationships between school segregation and social cohesion in Santiago initially requires a description of the main features of the organisation of education in Chile. The first section of this chapter describes the most relevant characteristics of the current organisation of education in Chile, including an overview of the organisational and governance arrangements of schools and an overview of curriculum provision and programs offered in schools. Also outlined are the key reforms that have shaped the current structure of schools and programs. The second part of the chapter describes the impact that the key reforms have had on school provision and patterns of school use, specifically in the city of Santiago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Students can also choose an artistic-sportive alternative for the last two years of secondary education, which can also be considered a vocational track.

  2. 2.

    All 2016 statistics on schools and enrolment are the author’s own calculations based on statistical information of MINEDUC 2017.

  3. 3.

    Corporation schools refer to 70 public schools, most of them secondary schools, which were transferred in 1980 from the State to not-for-profit organisations representative of industrial, agricultural, construction and commerce sectors, among others.

  4. 4.

    This initiative aims to promote academic performance of high achieving students by providing a public alternative of schools of excellence. However, it has been criticised for its potential effects on social and academic segregation.

  5. 5.

    Note that from 2016 onwards, these methods of student selection in private voucher and municipal schools that have not been identified as excellent schools will no longer be in place and gradually replaced by fair and transparent processes, as stipulated by law N 20.845.

  6. 6.

    This mechanism is commonly known in Chile as financiamiento compartido (shared funding).

  7. 7.

    Author’s calculations based on CASEN 2013.

  8. 8.

    It will be interesting to monitor the effects on segregation of the law approved in 2015 that regulates student admissions in Chile.

References

  • Bellei, C. (2013). El estudio de la segregación socioeconómica y académica de la educación chilena. Estudios pedagógicos (Valdivia), 39(1), 325–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M. (1998). National Voucher Plans in Chile and Sweden: Did privatization reforms make for better education? Comparative Education Review, 42(3), 309–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnoy, M., & McEwan, P. (2003). Does privatization improve education? The case of Chile’s national voucher plan. In Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective (pp. 24–44). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, A., & San Martín, E. (2012). Voucher system and school effectiveness: Reassessing school performance difference and parental choice decision-making. Estudios de Economia, 39(2), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castiglioni, R. (2001). The politics of retrenchment: The quandaries of social protection under military rule in Chile, 1973–1990. Latin American Politics and Society, 43(4), 37–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEP. (2006). Estudio Nacional de Opinión, Junio-Julio 2006. Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comité Técnico Asesor. (2008). Estudio Acerca de la validez Predictiva de los Factores de Selección a las Universidades del Consejo de Rectores Admisiones 2003 a 2006. In: julio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, C. (2003). Las políticas educacionales de Chile en las últimas dos décadas del siglo XX. In Políticas educacionales en el cambio de siglo. La reforma del sistema escolar en Chile (pp. 19–113). Santiago de Chile: Editorial Universaitaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egaña, M. L. (2000). La educación primaria popular en el siglo XIX en Chile: una práctica de política estatal. Santiago de Chile: Lom Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elacqua, G. (2012). The impact of school choice and public policy on segregation: Evidence from Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(3), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2011.08.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elacqua, G., & Fabrega, R. (2004). El consumidor de la educación: El actor olvidado de la libre elección de escuelas en Chile. Santiago de Chile: PREAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farías, M., & Carrasco, R. (2012). Diferencias en resultados académicos entre educación técnico-profesional y humanista-científica en Chile. Calidad en la Educación, 36, 87–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankenberg, E., Siegel-Hawley, G. (2013) 6. A Segregating choice? An overview of charter school policy, enrollment trends, and segregation. Educational Delusions?, Berkeley: University of California Press,. 2013, pp. 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520955103-009.

  • Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M., Bellolio, J., Piñera, J., De Castro, S., Kaiser, A., & Soto, A. (2012). Un Legado de Libertad Milton Friedman en Chile. Santiago: Instituto Democracia y Mercado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego, F. A., & Hernando, A. (2010). School choice in Chile: Looking at the demand side. Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile Documento de Trabajo, 356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauri, V. (1998). School choice in Chile. Two decades of educational reform. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2007). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C. T., & Urquiola, M. (2006). The effects of generalized school choice on achievement and stratification: Evidence from Chile’s voucher program. Journal of Public Economics, 90(8), 1477–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illanes, M. A. (1991). Ausente señorita. El niño chileno. La escuela para pobres y el auxilio. Chile 1890–1990 (Hacia una historia social del siglo XX en Chile).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jofré, G. (1988). El sistema de subvenciones en educación: la experiencia chilena. (No. 99). Santiago de Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos Santiago de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larrañaga, O., & Sanhueza, C. (2007). Residential segregation effects on poor’s opportunities in Chile. Santiago de Chile: Departamento de Economía, Universidad de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manzi, J., Bravo, D., Del Pino, G., Donoso, G., Martínez, M., & Pizarro, R. (2006). Estudio acerca de la validez predictiva de los factores de selección a las universidades del Consejo de Rectores. Comité Técnico Asesor del CRUCH.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, P. J., & Carnoy, M. (2000). The effectiveness and efficiency of private schools in Chile’s voucher system. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(3), 213–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MINEDUC. (2018). Indicadores de la Educación 2010–2016. Publicación Enero 2018. División de Planificación y Presupuesto, Ministerio de Educación de Chile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mizala, A., & Torche, F. (2012). Bringing the schools back in: The stratification of educational achievement in the Chilean voucher system. International Journal of Educational Development, 32(1), 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD/The World Bank. (2010). Chile’s international scholarship programme. In Reviews of National Policies for Education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G. (2013). Choice and civil rights: Forgetting history, facing consequences. In G. Orfield, E. Frankenberg, & Associates (Eds.), Educational delusions?: Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 3–35). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2013). Conclusion: A theory of choice and equity. In G. Orfield, E. Frankenberg, & Associates (Eds.), Educational delusions?: Why choice Can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F., Cáceres, G., & Cerda, J. (2001). Segregación residencial en las principales ciudades chilenas: Tendencias de las tres últimas décadas y posibles cursos de acción. eure (Santiago), 27(82), 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, H., & Elacqua, G. (2016). Socioeconomic school segregation in Chile: Parental choice and a theoretical counterfactual analysis. CEPAL Review, 2016, 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, M., Elacqua, G., & Buckley, J. (2006). School choice in Chile: Is it class or the classroom? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 577–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seppänen, P., Carrasco, A., Kalalahti, M., Rinne, R., & Simola, H. (2015). Contrasting dynamics in education politics of extremes. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel-Hawley, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2013). Designing choice: Magnet school structures and racial diversity. In G. Orfield, E. Frankenberg, & Associates (Eds.), Educational delusions?: Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair (pp. 3–35). London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & De los Ríos, D. (2008). Evolución de la segregación socioeconómica de los estudiantes chilenos y su relación con el financiamiento compartido. Proyecto FONIDE (211–2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Valenzuela, J. P., Bellei, C., & De los Ríos, D. (2014). Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy, 29(2), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2013.806995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas, J., & Peirano, C. (2002). Escuelas privadas con financiamiento público en Chile. Educación privada y política pública en América Latina, 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vial, L. B. (1998). Financiamiento compartido de la educación. Cuadernos de Economía, 325–342.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Molina, A. (2021). Organisation of Education in Chile and Santiago. In: School Segregation and Social Cohesion in Santiago. International Study of City Youth Education, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70534-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70534-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70533-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70534-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics