Abstract
A Darwinian model of the evolution of religion is obliged to use biological analogies on higher system levels. Such models suggest a synergy between processes literally driven by biological evolution, and others which are Darwinian by analogy. To provide a biological background for a proposed synthesis, this chapter charts the biological theory of evolution in a concise form. Successive historic stages are designated by version numbers, from Darwinism to Modern Evolutionary Synthesis. This overview demonstrates that explanations of religious evolution which comprise selectionist analogies with biological evolution are not consistently supported by the modern synthesis of evolutionary biology: At least, neutral evolution, evolutionary constraints and drift effects should be taken into account. Especially, the drift barrier hypothesis has surprising applications. As an example for “loaded” evolution, human eusociality—a disputed description of the social behavior of humans—is discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Authors mentioned in this paragraph are not listed as references: see Pigliucci and Mueller (2010).
References
Brewer, J., Gelfand, M., Jackson, J. C., MacDonald, I. F., Peregrine, P. N., Richerson, P. J., Turchin, P., Whitehouse, H., & Wilson, D. S. (2017). Grand challenges for the study of cultural evolution. Nature, Ecology & Evolution, 1, 0070. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0070.
Drossel, B. (2010). Die Rolle des Zufalls in der Evolution aus Sicht einer Physikerin. In M. Rothgangel & U. Beuttler (Eds.), Jahrbuch “Glaube und Denken” der Karl-Heim-Gesellschaft 23 (pp. 105–118). Berlin: Peter Lang.
Kundt, R. (2018). Making evolutionary science of religion an integral part of cognitive science of religion. In A. K. Petersen, I. S. Gilhus, M. H. Luther, J. S. Jensen, & J. Sørensen (Eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis (pp. 141–158). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Losos, J. B. (2018). Improbable destinies. New York: Penguin Random.
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A., & Laland, K. N. (2006). Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29, 329–383.
Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Petersen, Anders K., Ingvild S. Gilhus, Martin H. Luther, Jeppe S. Jensen & Jesper Sørensen (ed.). 2018. Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis. Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Pigliucci, M., & Mueller, G. B. (Eds.). (2010). Evolution—The extended synthesis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Sosis, R. (2018). Why cultural evolutionary models of religion need a systemic approach. In A. K. Petersen, I. S. Gilhus, M. H. Luther, J. S. Jensen, & J. Sørensen (Eds.), Evolution, cognition, and the history of religion: A new synthesis (pp. 45–61). Leiden/Boston: Brill.
Szosic, K. (2019). What is right and what is wrong in the Darwinian approach to the study of religion. Social Evolution and History. https://doi.org/10.30884/seh/2019.02.11.
Turner, J. H., Maryanski, A., Petersen, A. K., & Geertz, A. W. (2018). The emergence and evolution of religion: By means of natural selection. New York: Routledge.
Wunn, I., & Grojnowski, D. (2016). Ancestors, territoriality, and gods: A natural history of religion. Berlin: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hemminger, H. (2021). Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. In: Evolutionary Processes in the Natural History of Religion. New Approaches to the Scientific Study of Religion , vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70408-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70408-7_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70407-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70408-7
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)