Skip to main content

Comparison of Different Brain–Computer Interfaces to Assess Motor Imagery Using a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1284 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biosystems & Biorobotics ((BIOSYSROB,volume 28))

Abstract

The combination of a lower-limb exoskeleton with brain computer interfaces (BCI) can assist patients with motor impairment to walk again. In addition, it can promote the neural plasticity of the affected brain region. The present paper shows a research performed on seven able-bodied subjects that walked with an assistive exoskeleton controlled by external commands. The main objective was to identify in which frequency band the differences between periods of motor imagery and rest were more evident. The comparison was done with different classifiers and the results reveal that for the majority of them, the frequency band of 14–19 Hz provided the highest accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. T. Nierhaus, C. Vidaurre, A. Villringer, Immediate brain plasticity after one hour of brain–computer interface (BCI). J. Physiol. 17 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Wierzgała, D. Zapała, G.M. Wojcik, J. Masiak, Most popular signal processing methods in motor-imagery BCI: a review and meta-analysis. Front. Neuroinform. 12(November), 1–10 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. Pfurtscheller, C. Brunner, A. Schlo, F.H. Lopes, Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. Neuroimage 31, 153–159 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. M. Ortiz, E. Iáñez, J. Gaxiola, A. Kilicarslan, J.M. Azorín, S. Member, Assessment of motor imagery in gamma band using a lower limb exoskeleton, in IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC) (2019), pp. 2773–2778

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Kilicarslan, R.G. Grossman, J.L. Contreras-vidal, A robust adaptive denoising framework for real-time artifact removal in scalp EEG measurements. J. Neural Eng. 13(2), 26013 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Á. Costa et al., Decoding the attentional demands of gait through EEG gamma band features. PLoS One (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.G. Stockwell, R.P. Lowe, L. Mansinha, Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. J.S. Kirar, R.K. Agrawal, Relevant frequency band selection using sequential forward feature selection for motor imagery brain computer interfaces, in 2018 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI) (2018), pp 52–59

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities through grant CAS18/00048 ‘José Castillejo’; by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, the Spanish State Agency of Research, and the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund in the framework of the project Walk—Controlling lower-limb exoskeletons by means of brain-machine interfaces to assist people with walking disabilities (RTI2018-096677-B-I00); and by the Consellería de Innovación, Universidades, Ciencia y Sociedad Digital (Generalitat Valenciana) and the European Social Fund in the framework of the project ‘Desarrollo de nuevas interfaces cerebro-máquina para la rehabilitación de miembro inferior’ (GV/2019/009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Ferrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ferrero, L. et al. (2022). Comparison of Different Brain–Computer Interfaces to Assess Motor Imagery Using a Lower-Limb Exoskeleton. In: Torricelli, D., Akay, M., Pons, J.L. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation IV. ICNR 2020. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70316-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70316-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70315-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70316-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics