Skip to main content

“Overtake and Surpass”: Soviet Algorithmic Thinking as a Reinvention of Western Theories during the Cold War

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cold War Social Science

Abstract

This chapter examines the role of Cold War exchanges in the human sciences that shaped Soviet research on programmed instruction during the 1960s and 1970s. Pioneered by psychologist Lev Landa, this field sought to describe human learning in terms of logical structures and offered the theoretical foundation for the development of special teaching computers. Landa’s research had distinct resemblances to the quantitative orientation in American behavioral sciences of that time. His approach also made use of the conception of bounded human rationality produced in the US by mathematically inclined fields of social science. Nonetheless, while drawing on Western approaches to programmed instruction and cybernetics, Landa also adapted those to Soviet political, social, and ideological contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Slava Gerovitch, From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics, 1st ed. (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2002), 157.

  2. 2.

    On the rise of a quantitative orientation in American behavioral sciences, see Roger L. Geiger, Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993); Steve Joshua Heims, The Cybernetics Group (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1991); Mark Solovey, Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2013).

  3. 3.

    On the prominence of cognitive psychology in the US, see Jamie Cohen-Cole, The Open Mind: Cold War Politics and the Sciences of Human Nature (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2016); Christopher J. Phillips, The New Math: A Political History (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Gerovitch, From Newspeak to Cyberspeak, 2002.

  5. 5.

    S. M. Amadae, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism, 2nd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003); Paul Erickson, The World the Game Theorists Made (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2015); Joy Rohde, Armed with Expertise: The Militarization of American Social Research during the Cold War (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2013); Paul Erickson, et al., How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 2015); Hunter Heyck, Age of System: Understanding the Development of Modern Social Science (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015).

  6. 6.

    Ivan Boldyrev and Olessia Kirtchik, “On (Im)Permeabilities: Social and Human Sciences on Both Sides of the ‘Iron Curtain,’” History of the Human Sciences 29, no. 4–5 (October 2016): 3,7.

  7. 7.

    Gerovitch, From Newspeak to Cyberspeak, 2002, 156.

  8. 8.

    B. F. Skinner, “The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching,” Harvard Educational Review 24, no. 2 (1954), 153.

  9. 9.

    See Alexandra Rutherford, Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Technology of Behavior from Laboratory to Life, 1950s–1970s (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2009), 27.

  10. 10.

    B. F. Skinner, “Programmed Instruction Revisited,” The Phi Delta Kappan 68, no. 2 (1986): 104.

  11. 11.

    Letter, Keppel to Pusey, May 26, 1961, Records of the Office of Programmed Instruction, 1961–1969 (inclusive), box 3, folder “Keppel’s Letter to Pusey,” Harvard University Archives.

  12. 12.

    B. F. Skinner, “Russia, 1961,” The Spanish Journal of Psychology 9, no. 1 (2006): 115–142.

  13. 13.

    A. I. Berg, “Nauchnai͡a Organizat͡sii͡a Pedagogicheskogo Truda [Scientific Organization of Pedagogical Labor]” (Mezhduvedomstvennyĭ nauchnyĭ sovet po programmirovannomu obuchenii͡u [Interdepartmnetal Academic Council for Programmed Instruction], May 31, 1966, 9, f. 1810 d. 35, ARAN.

  14. 14.

    Ibid.

  15. 15.

    “Postanovlenie T͡SK KPSS, Sovmina SSSR Ot 21.05.1964 N 499 [Resolution of the Central Committee of Communist Party of the Soviet Union, 21.05.1964 N 499],” May 21, 1964, accessed March 10, 2019. http://www.libussr.ru/doc_ussr/usr_6082.htm

  16. 16.

    E. V. Šorohova, Osnovnye Napravleniâ Issledovanij Psihologii Myšleniâ v Kapitalističeskih Stranah [Major Directions in the Research on Cognition in Capitalist Countries] (Nauka, 1966), 138.

  17. 17.

    Lyudmila Ivanovna Ant͡syferova, Materialisticheskie Idei v Zarubezhnoĭ Psikhologii [Material Ideas in Foreign Psychology] (Moskva: Nauka, 1974), 8–10.

  18. 18.

    Institute of Psychology, “Otchet o Nauchno-Issledovatel′skoĭ i Nauchno-Organizat͡sionnoĭ Rabote Instituta Za 1973 God i Prilozhenie k Otchetu [Report on Research and Administrative Work of the Institute in 1973 and Attachments],” 1973, 10, f. 2097 o. 1 d. 6, ARAN; Ant͡syferova, Materialisticheskie Idei v Zarubezhnoĭ Psikhologii.

  19. 19.

    See A. A. Smirnov, “Leninskai͡a Teorii͡a Otrazhenii͡a i Psikhologii͡a [Lenin’s Theory of Reflection and Psychology],” Voprosy Psikhologii [The Issues of Psychology], no. 2 (1970): 3.

  20. 20.

    Ibid., 11.

  21. 21.

    Ant͡syferova, Materialisticheskie Idei v Zarubezhnoĭ Psikhologii, 55–59.

  22. 22.

    The fact that Soviet scholars preferred man–computer over man–animal metaphors is quite peculiar. Slava Gerovitch has demonstrated that Soviet physiology was dominated by man–machine metaphors as well. Even when they relied on Pavlovianism as the founding theory, Soviet physiologists used the metaphor of the telephone–switchboard to describe the higher nervous activity. Later, Soviet cyberneticists, replaced this metaphor with the analogy between the nervous system and feedback-controlled servomechanisms. See Slava Gerovitch, “Love-Hate for Man-Machine Metaphors in Soviet Physiology: From Pavlov to “Physiological Cybernetics,” Science in Context 15, no. 2 (2002): 341–342.

  23. 23.

    Ronald R. Kline, The Cybernetics Moment: Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2015), 19.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Gerovitch, From Newspeak to Cyberspeak, 139–40.

  26. 26.

    Ibid., 139, 142, 167.

  27. 27.

    Ibid., 209.

  28. 28.

    See Gerovitch, 202.

  29. 29.

    On one of the most prominent notions of STR in Eastern Europe, see Vitezslav Sommer, “Scientists of the World, Unite! Radovan Richta’s Theory of Scientific and Technological Revolution,” in Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond: Paradigms Defected, edited by Elena Aronova and Simone Turchetti (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016), 117–204.

  30. 30.

    Egle Rindzeviciute, The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened Up the Cold War World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2016), 28.

  31. 31.

    “NauchnoTekhnicheskai͡a Revoli͡ut͡sii͡a i Formirovanie Novogo CHeloveka [Scientific-Technical Revolution and the Formation of the New Man],” Voprosy Filosofii, no. 7 (1975): 14.

  32. 32.

    “Reshenie, Spisok Uchastnikov, Tezisy Dokladov Soveshchanii͡a Po Programmnomu Obuchenii͡u [The Resolution, the List of Participants, Theses Presented at the Meeting on Programmed Instruction],” June 7, 1962, 48, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 17, ARAN.

  33. 33.

    “Istorii͡a Fakul′teta [Department’s History],” Sankt-Peterburgskiĭ Gosudarstvennyĭ Universitet Fakul′tet Psikhologii [Saint Petersburg State University Department of Psychology], accessed April 1, 2019, http://www.psy.spbu.ru/department/history.

  34. 34.

    “Lev Naumovich Landa,” Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology], no. 5 (1999), 157–158.

  35. 35.

    “Reshenie, Spisok Uchastnikov, Tezisy Dokladov Soveshchanii͡a Po Programmnomu Obuchenii͡u [The Resolution, the List of Participants, Theses Presented at the Meeting on Programmed Instruction],” June 7, 1962, 51, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 17, ARAN.

  36. 36.

    Landa L. N., “Opyt Primeneniâ Matematičeskoj Logiki Teorii Informacii k Nekotorym Problemam Obučeniâ [An Attempt to Apply Mathematical Logic of Information Theory to Some Instructional Problems],” Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology], no. 2 (1962): 19–25.

  37. 37.

    Amadae, Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy; Erickson, The World the Game Theorists Made; Rohde, Armed with Expertise; Erickson et al., How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind; Heyck, Age of System.

  38. 38.

    Erickson et al., How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind, 1–8.

  39. 39.

    “Reshenie, Spisok Uchastnikov, Tezisy Dokladov Soveshchanii͡a Po Programmnomu Obuchenii͡u [The Resolution, the List of Participants, Theses Presented at the Meeting on Programmed Instruction],” June 7, 1962, 51, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 17, ARAN.

  40. 40.

    “Reshenie, Spisok Uchastnikov, Tezisy Dokladov Soveshchanii͡a Po Programmirovanomu Obuchenii͡u,” 56.

  41. 41.

    Nekotorye predlozhenii͡a ob organizat͡sii nauchno-issledovatel′skoĭ raboty po programmirovannomu obuchenii͡u [Some suggestions regarding the organization of research on programmed instruction], 19 May, 1962, 60, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 17, ARAN.

  42. 42.

    T͡SK KPSS, o Razvitii Rabot po Programmirovannomu Obuchenii͡u s Tsel′i͡u Povyshenii͡a Effektivnosti Podgotovki Kadrov [The Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, on the Work on Programmed Instruction and the Improvement of the Training of Human Resources], n.d., 77, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 17, ARAN.

  43. 43.

    Mark Solovey, Social Science for What? Battles over Public Funding for the ‘Other Sciences’ at the National Science Foundation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2020), 77, 169–171.

  44. 44.

    “Otchety o Nauchno-Issledovatel′skoĭ i Nauchno-Organizat͡sionoĭ Rabote Instituta za 1972 god i Prilozhenii͡a k nemu [Institute’s Research and Administrative Reports for the Year of 1972 and Supplemental Materials],” n.d., 4, 11, f. 2097, o. 1, d. 2, ARAN.

  45. 45.

    “Otchet o Rabote Sekt͡sii Kibernetika i Psikhologii͡a Za 1962 God [Report on the Work of the Section ‘Cybernetics and Psychology, 1962],” n.d., 63, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 11, ARAN.

  46. 46.

    On the role of computing and cybernetics in the development of American engineering psychology during the Cold War, see Edward Jones-Imhotep, “Maintaining Humans,” 175–195 in Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature ed. by Mark Solovey and Hamilton Cravens (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012); David A. Mindell, Between Human and Machine: Feedback, Control, and Computing before Cybernetics (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003), esp. “Cybernetics and Ideas of the Digital,” 276–306.

  47. 47.

    For a brief description of Boiko’s research, see Ushakov, “E. I. Boiko- Issledovatel Mekhanizmov Umstvennoi Deiatelnosti [E. I. Boiko – The Researcher of the Mechanisms of Mental Activity],” Psikhologicheskff Zhurnal 24, no. 4 (2004): 92–98.

  48. 48.

    “Reshenie Koordinat͡sionnogo Soveshchenii͡a Po Voprosam Primenenii͡a Kibernetiki v Psikhologii [Resolution of the Meeting on the Application of Cyberntics in Psychology],” n.d., 2, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 60, ARAN.

  49. 49.

    Cohen-Cole, The Open Mind, 143.

  50. 50.

    “Pervoocherednye Zadachi v Razvitii Issledovaniĭ po Programmirovannomu Obuchenii͡u v SSSR [The Most Important Tasks in the Research on Programmed Instruction],” December 7, 1964, 142, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 60.

  51. 51.

    Letter, A. I. Berg to E. K. Fyodorov, September 18, 1962, 2, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 24, ARAN.

  52. 52.

    Alexei Kojevnikov, Stalin’s Great Science: The Times and Adventures of Soviet Physicists (London: Imperial College Press, 2004).

  53. 53.

    V. N. Pushkin, “Psikhologicheskie Osnovy Problemnogo Obuchenii͡a [The Psychological Foundations of Problem-Based Learning],” Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology], no. 3 (1973): 158.

  54. 54.

    V. D. Nebylit͡syn, “Nauchno-Issledovatel′skai͡a Rabota Instituta Psikhologii APN SSSR v 1967 godu i v Svi͡azi s Nekotorymi Problemami Kibernetiki [Research of the Institute of Psychology APN SSSR in 1967 and its Connections to Cybernetic Problems], n.d., 82, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 122.

  55. 55.

    Lev Nakhmanovich Landa, Algoritmizat͡sii͡a v Obuchenii [Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction] (Moskva: Prosveshchenie, 1966), 11; An English translation of this work came out in the U.S. in 1974: Lev Nakhmanovich Landa, Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, 1974).

  56. 56.

    Lev Nakhmanovich Landa, Algoritmy i Programmirovannoe Obuchenie [Algorithms and Programmed Instruction], 1965, 13.

  57. 57.

    Landa, Algoritmizat͡sii͡a v Obuchenii], 96.

  58. 58.

    Ibid., 99–100.

  59. 59.

    “Zadachi Informat͡sionnogo Tsentra Programmirovannogo Obuchenii͡a [The Tasks of the Information Center on Programmed Instruction],” January 31, 1967, 73, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 153, ARAN.

  60. 60.

    N. F. Talyzina, Problemy Programmirovannogo Obuchenii͡a. Materialy Pi͡atogo Sovetsko-Frant͡suzskogo Seminara Po Programmirovannomu Obuchenii͡ui. [The Problems of Programmed IInstruction. Materials of the Fifth Soviet-French Seminar on Programmed Instruction.] (Moskva [Moscow]: Izdatel′stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta, 1979).

  61. 61.

    A. I. Berg, “Perepiska Ob Uchastii Sovetskikh Spet͡sialistov v Konferent͡sii Po Programmirovannomu Obuchenii͡u v Glazgo (SHotlandii͡a) [Correspondence about the Participation of Soviet Specialists in the Conference on Programmed Instruction in Glasgow (Scotland)],” n.d., f. 10,049 o.1a d. 596, GARF.

  62. 62.

    Robert M Gagné, “Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction by L. N. Landa,” Instructional Science 5, no. 2 (April 1976): 223–25.

  63. 63.

    Lev Nakhmanovich Landa, “V Mezhdunarodnyĭ Otdel APN SSSR [To the Department of Foreign Relations of the APN USSSR],” September 26, 1970, f. 10,049 o.1a d. 1269, GARF.

  64. 64.

    Robert M Gagné, “Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction by L. N. Landa,” 224–225; Other reviews of the translation of Algorithmization in Learning and instruction: J. Feldhusen, “Review of Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction by L. N. Landa,” Educational Psychologist 11, no. 2 (1974): 123–24; J. Leplat, review in Le Travail Humain 40, no. 1 (1977): 181–83; Philip Peak, review in The Mathematics Teacher 68, no. 3 (1975): 227.

  65. 65.

    “Avtomat-Ėkzamenator [Automat - Examiner],” Nauka i Zhizn′ [Science and Life], no. 3 (1962): 81.

  66. 66.

    Komissii͡a Nauchno-Metodicheskogo Soveta MĖI Po Vnedrenii͡u Tekhnicheskikh Sredstv v Obuchenii [The Commission on MEI Research and Methodological Council on the Introduction of the Technical Devices into Instruction] (Moskva [Moscow]: Moskovskiĭ Ėnergeticheskiĭ Institut [Moscow Energy Institute], 1976), 5.

  67. 67.

    Sbornik Dokladov Moskovskogo Ėnergeticheskogo Instituta Po Voprosu Ob Ėffektivnykh Metodakh Obuchenii͡a [The Edited Volume of Moscow Energy Institute on the Questions of Effective Methods of Instruction] (Moskva [Moscow], 1966).

  68. 68.

    I͡U. N. Kushelev, Tekhnicheskie Sredstva Obuchenii͡a i Kontroli͡a [Technical Means of Instruction and Control] (Moskva [Moscow]: Vysshai͡a SHkola, 1973), 56–57.

  69. 69.

    “Reshenie Kollegii Ministerstva Vysshego i Srednego Spet͡sial′nogo Obrazovanii͡a SSSR [The Resolution of the Advisory Board of the Ministry of Higher and Secondary Education USSR],” March 1973, 62, f. 9606 o. 1 d. 5462, GARF.

  70. 70.

    Numerous letters documenting attempts to build and implement teaching computers in various parts of the Soviet Union can be found in f. 1807, o. 1, d. 60, ARAN.

  71. 71.

    Letter, V. P. Bespalko to A. I. Berg, July 29, 1964, f. 1807, o. 1, d. 60, ARAN.

  72. 72.

    “Lev Naumovich Landa.”

  73. 73.

    Otis Port, “Lev Landa’s Worker Miracles,” Business Week, September 21, 1992.

  74. 74.

    Boldyrev and Kirtchik, “On (Im)Permeabilities,” 7.

  75. 75.

    Erickson et al., How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind, 75.

References

  • Amadae, S. M. 2003. Rationalizing Capitalist Democracy: The Cold War Origins of Rational Choice Liberalism. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ant͡syferova, Lyudmila Ivanovna. 1974. Materialisticheskie Idei v Zarubezhnoĭ Psikhologii [Material Ideas in Foreign Psychology]. Moscow: Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avtomat-Ėkzamenator [Automat—Examiner]. 1962. Nauka i Zhizn’ [Science and Life], no. 3: 81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boldyrev, Ivan, and Olessia Kirtchik. 2016. On (Im)Permeabilities: Social and Human Sciences on Both Sides of the ‘Iron Curtain.’ History of the Human Sciences 29, no. 4–5: 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952695116666748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Cole, Jamie. 2016. The Open Mind: Cold War Politics and the Sciences of Human Nature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Paul. 2015. The World the Game Theorists Made. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, Paul, et al. 2015. How Reason Almost Lost Its Mind: The Strange Career of Cold War Rationality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhusen, J. 1974. Review of Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction by L. N. Landa. Educational Psychologist 11, no. 2 (1974): 123–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, Robert M. Review of Algorithmizing in Learning and Instruction, by L. N. Landa. 1976. Instructional Science 5, no. 3: 223–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, Roger L. 1993. Research and Relevant Knowledge: American Research Universities Since World War II. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerovitch, Slava. 2002. From Newspeak to Cyberspeak: A History of Soviet Cybernetics. 1st edition. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heims, Steve Joshua. 1991. The Cybernetics Group. Cambridge, Mass: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyck, Hunter. 2015. Age of System: Understanding the Development of Modern Social Science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Imhotep, Edward. 2012. Maintaining Humans. In Cold War Social Science: Knowledge Production, Liberal Democracy, and Human Nature, ed. Hamilton Cravens and Mark Solovey, 175–95. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, Ronald R. 2015. The Cybernetics Moment: Or Why We Call Our Age the Information Age. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojevnikov, Alexei. 2004. Stalin’s Great Science: The Times and Adventures of Soviet Physicists. London: Imperial College Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Komissii͡a Nauchno-Metodicheskogo Soveta MĖI Po Vnedrenii͡u Tekhnicheskikh Sredstv v Obuchenii [The Commission on MEI Research and Methodological Council on the Introduction of the Technical Devices into Instruction]. 1976. Moscow: Moskovskiĭ Ėnergeticheskiĭ Institut [Moscow Energy Institute].

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa L. N. 1962. Opyt Primeneniâ Matematičeskoj Logiki Teorii Informacii k Nekotorym Problemam Obučeniâ [An Attempt to Apply Mathematical Logic of Information Theory to Some Instructional Problems]. Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology], no. 2: 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, Lev Nakhmanovich. 1974. Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Educational Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, Lev Nakhmanovich 1966. Algoritmizat͡sii͡a v Obuchenii [Algorithmization in Learning and Instruction]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landa, Lev Nakhmanovich 1965. Algoritmy i Programmirovannoe Obuchenie [Algorithms and Programmed Instruction]. Moscow: Pedagogicheskoye obshchestvo RSFSR [The Pedagogical Society of the RSFSR].

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplat, J. 1977. Review of Algorithmizing in Learning and Instruction, by L. N. Landa. Le Travail Humain 40, no. 1: 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev Naumovich Landa. 1999. Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology]. http://www.voppsy.ru/journals_all/issues/1999/995/995157.htm. Accessed 1 April 2019.

  • Mindell, David A. 2003. Between Human and Machine: Feedback, Control, and Computing before Cybernetics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NauchnoTekhnicheskai͡a Revoli͡ut͡sii͡a i Formirovanie Novogo CHeloveka [Scientific -Technical Revolution and the Formation of the New Man]. 1975. Voprosy Filosofii [Problems of Phylosophy], no. 7: 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peak, Philip. Review of Algorithmizing in Learning and Instruction, by L. N. Landa. 1975. The Mathematics Teacher 68, no. 3: 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, Christopher J. 2014. The New Math: A Political History. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Postanovlenie T͡SK KPSS, Sovmina SSSR Ot 21.05.1964 N 499 [Resolution of the Central Committee of Communist Party of the Soviet Union, 21.05.1964 N 499],” 1964. http://www.libussr.ru/doc_ussr/usr_6082.htm.Accessed June 15 2019.

  • Pushkin, V.N. 1973. Psikhologicheskie Osnovy Problemnogo Obuchenii͡a [The Psychological Foundations of Problem-Based Learning]. Voprosy Psikhologii [Problems of Psychology], no. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rindzeviciute, Egle. 2016. The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened Up the Cold War World. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rohde, Joy. 2013. Armed with Expertise: The Militarization of American Social Research during the Cold War. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, Alexandra. 2009. Beyond the Box: B.F. Skinner’s Technology of Behavior from Laboratory to Life, 1950s-1970s. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sankt-Peterburgskiĭ Gosudarstvennyĭ Universitet Fakul′tet Psikhologii [Saint Peterburg State University Department of Psychology]. 2019. Istorii͡a Fakul′teta [Department’s History]. http://www.psy.spbu.ru/department/history. Accessed April 1 2019.

  • Sbornik Dokladov Moskovskogo Ėnergeticheskogo Instituta Po Voprosu Ob Ėffektivnykh Metodakh Obuchenii͡a [The Edited Volume of Moscow Energy Institute on the Questions of Effective Methods of Instruction]. 1966. Moscow: Moskovskiy Ordena Lenina Energeticheskiy Institut [Moscow Energy Institute].

    Google Scholar 

  • Serebri͡annikov, S. V 2010. MÈI. Istoriâ. Lûdi. Gody [MEI. History. People. Years]. Moscow: Izdatel′skiĭ Dom MĖI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. 1986. Programmed Instruction Revisited. The Phi Delta Kappan 68, no. 2: 103–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. 2006. Russia, 1961. The Spanish Journal of Psychology 9, no. 1: 115–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. 1954. The Science of Learning and the Art of Teaching. Harvard Educational Review 24, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirnov, A. A. 1970. Leninskai͡a Teorii͡a Otrazhenii͡a i Psikhologii͡a [Lenin’s Theory of Reflection and Psychology]. Voprosy Psikhologii [The Issues of Psychology], no. 2: 3–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovey, Mark. 2013. Shaky Foundations: The Politics-Patronage-Social Science Nexus in Cold War America. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solovey, Mark. 2020. Social Science for What? Public Funding for the ‘Other Sciences’ at the U.S. National Science Foundation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, Vitezslav. 2016. Scientists of the World, Unite! Radovan Richta’s Theory of Scientific and Technological Revolution. In Science Studies during the Cold War and Beyond: Paradigms Defected, ed. Elena Aronova and Simone Turchetti. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Šorohova, E. V. 1966. Osnovnye Napravleniâ Issledovanij Psihologii Myšleniâ v Kapitalističeskih Stranah [Major Directions in the Research on Cognition in Capitalist Countries]. Nauka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talyzina, N. F. 1979. Problemy Programmirovannogo Obuchenii͡a. Materialy Pi͡atogo Sovetsko-Frant͡suzskogo Seminara Po Programmirovannomu Obuchenii͡ui. [The Problems of Programmed Instruction. Materials of the Fifth Soviet-French Seminar on Programmed Instruction.]. Moscow: Izdatel′stvo Moskovskogo Universiteta [The Publishing House of Moscow University].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov. 2004. E. I. Boiko- Issledovatel Mekhanizmov Umstvennoi Deiatelnosti [E. I. Boiko—The Researcher of the Mechanisms of Mental Activity]. Psikhologicheskff Zhurnal 24, no. 4: 92–98.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekaterina Babintseva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Babintseva, E. (2021). “Overtake and Surpass”: Soviet Algorithmic Thinking as a Reinvention of Western Theories during the Cold War. In: Solovey, M., Dayé, C. (eds) Cold War Social Science. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70246-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70245-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70246-5

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics