Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Why People with a Cochlear Implant Listen to Music

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Perception, Representations, Image, Sound, Music (CMMR 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12631))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The cochlear implant (CI) is the most successful neural prosthetic device in the market. It allows hundreds of thousands of people around the world to regain a sense of hearing. However, unlike a pair of glasses that can restore vision perfectly, the CI still has some shortcomings for non-speech sounds such as music and environmental sounds. Many studies have shown that most CI users have great difficulties perceiving pitch differences or recognizing simple melodies without words or rhythmical cues. Consequently, CI users report finding music less pleasant compared to their pre-deafness period. Despite this, many of those users do not entirely reject music, and it is not uncommon to see young CI users listening to music all day, or even playing an instrument. Listening to music is an experience that arises from more than the sum of the sensations induced by the basic elements of music: pitch, timbre and rhythm. Listening to music is a pleasant experience because it prompts high-level cognitive aspects such as emotional reactions, needs to dance, or the feeling of musical tension. Therefore, CI users still engaged in musical activities might experience some of these high-level features. In this paper, I will review recent studies on music perception in CI listeners and demonstrate that, although most CI users have difficulties with perceiving pitch, additional music cues such as tempo and dynamic range might contribute positively to their enjoyment of music.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://olivierlar.github.io/miningsuite/.

References

  1. Ambert-Dahan, E., Giraud, A.L., Sterkers, O., Samson, S.: Judgment of musical emotions after cochlear implantation in adults with progressive deafness. Front. Psychol. 6, 181 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brockmeier, S.: Emotional response to music in combi 40/40+ users. Cochlear Implants International (S1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brockmeier, S., et al.: Correlation of speech and music perception in postlingually deafCombi 40/40+ users. In: Kubo, T., Iwaki, T. (eds.) Cochlear Implants - An Update, p. 599. Kugler Publications (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caldwell, M.T., Jiradejvong, P., Limb, C.J.: Impaired perception of sensory consonance and dissonance in cochlear implant users. Otol. Neurotol. 37(3), 229–234 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gfeller, K., et al.: Recognition of familiar melodies by adult cochlear implant recipients and normal-hearing adults. Cochlear Implants Int. 3(1), 29–53 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gfeller, K., et al.: Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 13(3), 132–145 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gfeller, K., Witt, S., Mehr, M.A., Woodworth, G., Knutson, J.: Effects of frequency, instrumental family, and cochlear implant type on timbre recognition and appraisal. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111(4), 349–356 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gfeller, K., Woodworth, G., Robin, D.A., Witt, S., Knutson, J.F.: Perception of rhythmic and sequential pitch patterns by normally hearing adults and adult cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 18(3), 252–260 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hjortkjær, J.: Toward a cognitive theory of musical tension. Ph.D. thesis, Copenhagen University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huron, D.: Tone and voice: a derivation of the rules of voice-leading from perceptual principles. Music Percept. 19(1), 1–64 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Innes-Brown, H., Marozeau, J., Storey, C.M., Blamey, P.J.: Tone, rhythm, and timbre perception in school-age children using cochlear implants and hearing Aids. J. Am. Acad. Audiol. 24(9), 789–806 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jiam, N.T., Limb, C.J.: Rhythm processing in cochlear implant-mediated music perception. Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 1453, 22–28 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang, R., et al.: Development and validation of the University of Washington clinical assessment of music perception test. Ear Hear. 30(4), 411–418 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0b013e3181a61bc0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knobloch, M., Verhey, J.L., Ziese, M., Nitschmann, M., Arens, C., Böckmann-Barthel, M.: Musical harmony in electric hearing. Music Percept.: Interdisc. J. 36(1), 40–52 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kong, Y.Y., Cruz, R., Jones, J.A., Zeng, F.G.: Music perception with temporal cues in acoustic and electric hearing. Ear Hear. 25(2), 173–185 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kong, Y.Y., Mullangi, A., Marozeau, J.: Timbre and speech perception in bimodal and bilateral cochlear-implant listeners. Ear Hear. 33(5), 645–659 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kong, Y.Y., Mullangi, A., Marozeau, J., Epstein, M.: Temporal and spectral cues for musical timbre perception in electric hearing. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 54, 981–994 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Laneau, J., Moonen, M., Wouters, J.: Factors affecting the use of noise-band vocoders as acoustic models for pitch perception in cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119(1), 491–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lerdahl, F.: Tonal Pitch Space. Oxford University Press, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lerdahl, F., Krumhansl, C.L.: Modeling tonal tension. Music Percep.: Interdisc. J. 24(4), 329–366 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Looi, V., McDermott, H., McKay, C.M., Hickson, L.: Pitch discrimination and melody recognition by cochlear implant users. Int. Congr. Ser. 1273, 197–200 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Looi, V., She, J.: Music perception of cochlear implant users: a questionnaire, and its implications for a music training program. Int. J. Audiol. 49(2), 116–128 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Macherey, O., Delpierre, A.: Perception of musical timbre by cochlear implant listeners: a multidimensional scaling study. Ear Hear. 34(4), 426–436 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Marozeau, J., Lamping, W.: Timbre perception with cochlear implants. In: Siedenburg, K., Saitis, C., McAdams, S., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (eds.) Timbre: Acoustics, Perception, and Cognition. SHAR, vol. 69, pp. 273–293. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14832-4_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Marozeau, J., Simon, N., Innes-brown, H.: Cochlear implants can talk but cannot sing in tune. Acoust. Aust. 42(2), 131–135 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  26. McAdams, S., Winsberg, S., Donnadieu, S., De Soete, G., Krimphoff, J.: Perceptual scaling of synthesized musical timbres: common dimensions, specificities, and latent subject classes. Psychol. Res. 58(3), 177–192 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McDermott, H.: Music perception with cochlear implants: a review. Trends Amplif. 8(2), 49–82 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. McDermott, H., Looi, V.: Perception of complex signals, including musical sounds, with cochlear implants. Int. Congr. Ser. 1273, 201–204 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Migirov, L., Kronenberg, J., Henkin, Y.: Self-reported listening habits and enjoyment of music among adult cochlear implant recipients. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 118(5), 350–355 (2009). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429493485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Phillips-Silver, J., Toiviainen, P., Gosselin, N., Turgeon, C., Lepore, F., Peretz, I.: Cochlear implant users move in time to the beat of drum music. Hear. Res. 321, 25–34 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Schoenberg, A.: Style and Idea. St. Martins Press, New York (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Spangmose-Pedersen, S., Hjortkjær, J., Marozeau, J.: Perception of musical tension in cochlear implant listeners. Front. Audit. Cogn. Neurosci. 13, 987 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vannson, N., Innes-Brown, H., Marozeau, J.: Dichotic listening can improve perceived clarity of music in cochlear implant users. Trends Hear. 19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216515598971

  34. Vieillard, S., Peretz, I., Gosselin, N., Khalfa, S., Gagnon, L., Bouchard, B.: Happy, sad, scary and peaceful musical excerpts for research on emotions. Cogn. Emot. 22(4), 720–752 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zimmer, V., Verhey, J.L., Ziese, M., Böckmann-Barthel, M.: Harmony perception in prelingually deaf, juvenile cochlear implant users. Front. Neurosci. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Data on pulsation with NH listeners presented in Sect. 4.1 was collected by Tanmayee Pathre during her final research project for her master degree. I would like to thank Niclas Janssen for his useful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hearing System Group, Department of Health Technology, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark

    Jérémy Marozeau

Authors
  1. Jérémy Marozeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérémy Marozeau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire PRISM, CNRS-AMU, Marseille, France

    Richard Kronland-Martinet

  2. Laboratoire PRISM, CNRS-AMU, Marseille, France

    Sølvi Ystad

  3. Laboratoire PRISM, CNRS-AMU, Marseille, France

    Mitsuko Aramaki

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marozeau, J. (2021). Why People with a Cochlear Implant Listen to Music. In: Kronland-Martinet, R., Ystad, S., Aramaki, M. (eds) Perception, Representations, Image, Sound, Music. CMMR 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12631. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70210-6_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70210-6_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70209-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70210-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation