Abstract
This chapter focuses on theoretical understandings of complex systems and their relevance for strategies to plan for, and adapt to, pandemic events. It considers, from a geographical perspective, the literature conceptualising complexity and nexus theories. This literature highlights diverse features of complexity, such as emergence, path dependency, openness and closure, self-organisation, and co-evolution. The chapter explores the relevance of these for human experience of pandemics and the knowledge and action upon which effective preparedness and response may depend. The complex interdependency of sociopolitical, economic, and health-care systems has become very evident as societies have struggled to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The literature on complexity underlines the need to combine and exchange different sources and types of knowledge and observation. These include geographical perspectives that inform planning and response to pandemics and include sensitivity to regional and local variability in the organisation and functioning of complex systems. These perspectives also suggest themes for future research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Boulos, M. K. N., & Geraghty, E. M. (2020). Geographical tracking and mapping of coronavirus disease COVID-19/severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) epidemic and associated events around the world: How 21st century GIS technologies are supporting the global fight against outbreaks and epidemics. International Journal of Health Geographics, 19(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12942-020-00202-8.
Curtis, S., & Riva, M. (2010). Health geographies I: Complexity theory and human health. Progress in Human Geography, 34(2), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132509336026.
Curtis, S. E., Oven, K. J., Wistow, J., Dunn, C. E., & Dominelli, L. (2018). Adaptation to extreme weather events in complex local health care systems: The example of older people’s health and care services in England. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(1), 67–91 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/2399654417695101.
Dijkstra, H., & De Ruijter, A. (2017). The Health-Security Nexus and the European Union: Toward a research agenda. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 8(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2017.34.
Gatrell, A. C. (2005). Complexity theory and geographies of health: A critical assessment. Social Science & Medicine, 60(12), 2661–2671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.11.002.
GOV.UK. (2020). Syndromic surveillance: Weekly summaries for 2020. Retrieved August 8, 2020, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/syndromic-surveillance-weekly-summaries-for-2020.
Herrick, C. (2016). Global health, geographical contingency, and contingent geographies. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 106(3), 672–687. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2016.1140017.
Liritzis, I. (2020). Pandemics—From ancient times to COVID19. Some thoughts. Mediterranean Archaeology & Archaeometry, 20(1), I–IX. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3724821.
Mangiarotti, S., Peyre, M., Zhang, Y., Huc, M., Roger, F., & Kerr, Y. (2020). Chaos theory applied to the outbreak of COVID-19 and ancillary approach to decision making in pandemic context. Epidemiology and Infection, 148(e95), 1–9. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/epidemiology-and-infection/article/chaos-theory-applied-to-the-outbreak-of-covid19-an-ancillary-approach-to-decision-making-in-pandemic-context/07A53305F996B2B9498F25606DB83B0.
Mo, C. B., Tan, D. C., Mai, T. Y., Bei, C. H., Qin, J., Pang, W. Y., et al. (2020). An analysis of spatiotemporal pattern for COIVD-19 in China based on space-time cube. Journal of Medical Virology, 92(9), 1587–1595. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25834.
Oven, K. J., Wistow, J., & Curtis, S. E. (2019). Older people and climate change: Vulnerability and resilience to extreme weather in England. In L. R. Mason & J. Rigg (Eds.), People and climate change (pp. 68–86). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Renn, O., Lucas, K., Haas, A., & Jaeger, C. (2019). Things are different today: The challenge of global systemic risks. Journal of Risk Research, 22(4), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1409252.
Yu, H. C., Mui, K. W., Wong, L. T., & Chu, H. S. (2017). Ventilation of general hospital wards for mitigating infection risks of three kinds of viruses including Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Indoor and Built Environment, 26(4), 514–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326x16631596.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Curtis, S.E. (2021). Emergent Global Pandemic Risks, Complex Systems, and Population Health. In: Andrews, G.J., Crooks, V.A., Pearce, J.R., Messina, J.P. (eds) COVID-19 and Similar Futures. Global Perspectives on Health Geography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70179-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70179-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70178-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70179-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)