Skip to main content

On Comrade Timiryazev’s Attitude to Modern Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Boris Hessen: Physics and Philosophy in the Soviet Union, 1927–1931

Part of the book series: History of Physics ((HIPHY))

  • 274 Accesses

Abstract

We published our article on the Fifth Congress of Russian physicists in the first issue of this magazine and signed it H. E.

TN: Translated from Pod Znamenem Marksizma (Under the Banner of Marxism), 1927, Nos. 2–3. Cited by Joravsky (2019), p. 186, n. 360 and Josephson (1991), p. 385, n. 75. TN: For more on Egorshin and Timiryazev see Appendix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    TN: See Chap. 2.

  2. 2.

    TN: For Dayton Miller see Appendix.

  3. 3.

    TN: Roy J. Kennedy was an American physicist who also carried out experiments relating to the speed of light.

  4. 4.

    TN: On Vavilov see Appendix.

  5. 5.

    BH and VE: Lenin, V. I., “On the question of dialectics”, Pod Znamenem Marksizma (Under the Banner of Marxism) 5–6 (1925): p. 17. TN: English translation taken from Philosophical Notebooks, (Lenin 1976), pp. 360–361.

  6. 6.

    TN: Chap. 5, Sect. 8 in Lenin (1977).

  7. 7.

    TN: For Ernst Mach, see Appendix. Pierre Duhem (1861–1916) was a French theoretical physicist but today is well-known for his contribution to the history and philosophy of science. John Stallo (1823–1900), a German–American intellectual who was an early contributor to the philosophy of science to whom Mach was sympathetic. Lenin attacks Duhem and Stallo, like Mach, for alleged “idealism”. Abel Rey (1873–1940) was a French philosopher and historian of science whose philosophy Lenin denounced as “positivism” but whose summary of the latest developments in physics Lenin studied as being made “carefully and in general conscientiously” (p. 254).

  8. 8.

    TN: References to the Russian edition. The English translation is in Lenin (1977), p. 310.

  9. 9.

    TN: The Black Hundreds were an ultra-nationalist movement in Russia in the early twentieth century. It is used here as a term of abuse, meaning “reactionary”, as Einstein was originally a supporter of Mach.

  10. 10.

    TN: i.e. the Russian edition of “Materialism and Empirio-criticism”. The English translation given here is Lenin (1977), p 306.

  11. 11.

    TN: In the context of Russian Orthodox Church history, the Old Believers, or Old Ritualists separated after 1666 from the official Russian Orthodox Church in protest against church reforms introduced by Patriarch Nikon of Moscow between 1652 and 1666.

  12. 12.

    BH and VE: Here is a correct reference: Comrade Timiryazev writes that the Schrödinger theory appeared in the autumn of 1926. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger’s first works appeared in February 1926.

  13. 13.

    BH and VE: (Kirchhoff 1897). TN: The translation from the Russian text is given here. It is apparently intended to correspond to the original German sentence in Kirchhoff (1897), p. 1: “Die Mechanik ist die Wissenschaft von der Bewegung; als ihre Aufgabe bezeichnen wir: die in der Natur vor sich gehenden Bewegungen “vollständig” und “auf die einfächste Weise” zu beschreiben.” This translates as “Mechanics is the science of movement; we define as its task: to describe completely and in the simplest manner the movements taking place in nature.” The authors italicising of “description” does not correspond to the original.

  14. 14.

    TN: The English translation is given here, (Lenin 1977), p. 171.

  15. 15.

    TN: The authors are presumably referring to Kirchhoff (1897). The translation from the Russian text is given here. Although given in quotes it appears to be attempting to summarise Kirchhoff’s view on force (Kraft) rather than giving an exact quotation. To suggest that Kirchoff wants to “remove” the concept of force from mechanics is not really correct, rather he wants to remove obscure definitions referring to force. In the Preface he writes that “One tends to define mechanics as the science of the forces, and the forces as the causes which produce, or strive to produce, motions . . . it seems to me [to be] desirable to remove from it such obscurities, even if that is only possible by narrowing its task.” German original: “Man pflegt die Mechanik als die Wissenschaft von den Kräften zu definiren, und die Kräfte als die Ursachen, welche Bewegungen hervorbringen oder hervorzubringen streben. . . scheint es mir wünschenswerth, solche Dunkelheiten aus ihr zu entfernen, auch wenn das nur möglich ist durch eine Einschränkung ihrer Aufgabe.”.

  16. 16.

    TN: The Balmer series refers to lines at certain frequencies in the spectrum of light of a hydrogen atom. Rydberg gave a formula to calculate the frequencies of such lines. The formula for hydrogen contains a constant named after him.

  17. 17.

    BH and VE: Maxwell, “Matter and motion”, Russian translation, p. 1. TN: Italics added by BH and VE. The English original given here is Maxwell (1876), or https://archive.org/details/mattermotion00maxwiala/page/n8/mode/2up, pp. 1–2.

  18. 18.

    BH and VE: Silvanus P. Thompson, “Life of Lord Kelvin, vol. 2,” p. 1073. TN: (Thompson 2005), pp. 1072–3.

  19. 19.

    TN: Latin, first person plural future active indicative of ignoro (“we won’t know”).

  20. 20.

    TN: Sir Joseph John “J. J.” Thomson, (1856–1940), famous British physicist. He discovered the electron, for which he received the Nobel Prize. He also discovered isotopes, and invented the mass spectrometer.

  21. 21.

    TN: “H. E.” is the author’s name given in the article in Chap. 2, obviously referring to Hessen and Egorshin.

  22. 22.

    TN: Ludwig Feuerbach (Engels 1990), pp. 369–370, (Lenin 1977), p. 251.

  23. 23.

    TN: Fictionalist: Reference to the German Kantian philosopher Hans Vaihinger’s “Philosophy of As If.” See (Vaihinger 2000).

  24. 24.

    BH and VE: M. Planck, “Physical laws in the light of new research”, Russian translation in Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk, 6 (1926), p. 192. TN: German original, (Planck 1926). The translation closely follows the original.

  25. 25.

    BH and VE: A. F. Joffe says, “A theory describing material phenomena and physical processes in matter cannot contradict the materialistic worldview if only it aspires to describe qualities of matter in the best possible way.” What is the specific content of a physical theory is a “question of expedience” (Pravda, 1 January 1927).

    Regarding this paragraph A. K. Timiryazev comments as follows, “He (A. F. Joffe) definitely equates materialism and Machist philosophy ...with just one word economical substituted by the word expedient” (Pravda, 26 February 1927). A. K. Timiryazev is surprisingly generous with the label “Machism”. A. F. Joffe everywhere speaks of matter, but Comrade Timiryazev sees here a “complex of sensations”.

    A. F. Joffe uses an unfortunate expression “expediency”. However, the whole context demonstrates whether it expresses a Machist “description” or not. A. F. Joffe’s next sentence is, “The best of these ideas (of matter) is the one that closer than others approximates the qualities of real matter.” Consequently, A. F. Joffe uses “expediency” in the sense of conformity to reality.

    Therefore, here is an obviously inappropriate accusation of Machism that counts on readers being too lazy to look up A. F. Joffe’s article.

  26. 26.

    TN: Lenin criticises “to conceive motion without matter” as idealist. Lenin (1977), pp. 266–273.

  27. 27.

    TN: The authors refer to the article in Chap. 2, pp. 20–21.

  28. 28.

    TN: i.e. Chap. 2, p. 20.

  29. 29.

    TN: The authors are referring to A. K. Timiryazev’s article in the collection: Natural science and dialectical materialism (Moscow: Materialist Publishers, 1925).

  30. 30.

    TN: Ibid. p. 321.

  31. 31.

    TN: William Wien (1864–1928), a leading German physicist. He is best known for his work on heat (black-body) radiation for which he won the Nobel Prize in 1911.

  32. 32.

    TN: (Wien 1926), p. 14. The translation here closely follows the German original.

  33. 33.

    TN: See p. 38, n. 26 above.

  34. 34.

    TN: Erwin Madelung (1881–1972), a German physicist who worked on atomic physics and quantum mechanics gave an alternative “hydrodynamical” interpretation of Schrödinger’s equation.

  35. 35.

    BH and VE: (Madelung 1926a, b).

  36. 36.

    TN: (Madelung 1926a), p. 1004.

  37. 37.

    TN: Thomson developed a theory of “ether mass” in which the electromognetic field contributed to the mass of a charged particle, an approach which was eventually incorporated in Einstein’s theory of special relativity. Thomson’s initial paper in 1881 was Thomson (1881).

  38. 38.

    TN: See p. 39, n. 30.

  39. 39.

    BH and VE: (Darwin 1927).

  40. 40.

    BH and VE: Compare (Schrödinger 1926). Particularly, paragraphs 2 and 7.

  41. 41.

    BH and VE: It is interesting to note that Comrade Timiryazev, who considers Heisenberg’s and Schrödinger’s theories unacceptable for materialistic physics, has never spoken on this matter in the discussions that took place at the congress of physicists.

  42. 42.

    TN: Napostovstvo (Onguardism)—a group of proletarian writers who published a magazine Na postu in 1923–1925. According to Joravsky (2019), pp. 159–160, in literary disputes they were a tendency that wanted “to reject ‘bourgeois culture’ indiscriminately and to advocate unreasoning force in promoting ‘proletarian’ culture.”.

References

  • Darwin, C. G. (1927). The electron as vector wave. Nature, 119, 282–284.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, F. (1990). Marx Engels collected works (Vol. 26). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joravsky, D. (2019). Soviet Marxism and natural science, 1917–1932 (2nd ed.). Routledge, Abingdon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, P. R. (1991). Physics and politics in revolutionary Russia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchhoff, G. (1897). Vorlesungen über Mechanik (4th ed.). B. G. Teübner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1976). Collected works (Vol. 38). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, V. (1977). Collected works (Vol. 14). Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madelung, E. (1926a). Eine anschauliche Deutung der Gleichung von Schrödinger. Die Naturwissenschaften (The Science of Nature), 14(45), 1004.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Madelung, E. (1926b). Quantentheorie in Hydrodynamischer Form. Zeitschrift für Physik, 40(3–4), 322–326.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C. (1876). Matter and motion. London: Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Planck, M. (1926). Physikalische Gesetzlichkeit im Lichte neuerer Forschung. Die Naturwissenschaften (The Science of Nature), 14(13), 257.

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Schrödinger, E. (1926). Quantesierung und Eigewertproblem, (Vierte Mitteilung). Annalen der Physik, 81(18), 109–139.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (2005). Life of Lord Kelvin (Vol. 2, p. 1910). Reprint of Macmillan: American Mathematical Society—Chelsea, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. J. (1881). On the electric and magnetic effects produced by the motion of electrified bodies. Philosophical Magazine, 11(68), 229–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaihinger, H. (2000). The philosophy of “As if”: A system of the theoretical, practical and religious fictions of mankind. Routledge, London. Originally published in German in 1911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wien, W. (1926). Vergangenheit. Gengenwart und Zukunft der Physik: Maxheuber Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Hessen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hessen, B., Egorshin, V. (2021). On Comrade Timiryazev’s Attitude to Modern Science. In: Talbot, C., Pattison, O. (eds) Boris Hessen: Physics and Philosophy in the Soviet Union, 1927–1931. History of Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70045-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics