Skip to main content

Urban Agricultural Experiences: Focusing on Twenty-First Century Learning Skills and Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Approaches in Urban Agriculture and Community Contexts

Part of the book series: Urban Agriculture ((URBA))

  • 415 Accesses

Abstract

School gardens are considered non-formal learning settings and a source of experiential learning and have been used to teach core academic subjects such as science, history, art, language, and mathematics in a hands-on, experiential learning environment. More recently, some schools have promoted school gardens as outreach programs intended to help underprivileged citizens. The author reports on a study which explored how school gardens involved in urban garden initiatives addressed the issue of social justice. Findings indicate that the urban garden initiative started with a school garden and moved outward into the community. Students were empowered, as well as the school’s extended community through good nutrition, the experience of successfully growing food, and the relationships formed in the process. In addition to fostering environmental stewardship and community building, the school garden program addressed the issue of hunger and poverty within and beyond the school walls and into the wider community. Environmental stewardship, food security, youth empowerment, and proper nutrition are some outcomes of this urban agriculture initiative.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, J. M., Johnson, K. E., & Kelley, K. (2012). Longitudinal analysis of the relations between opportunities to learn about science and the development of interests related to science. Science Education, 96(5), 763–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvai, J. L., Campbell, V. E. A., Baird, A., & Rivers, L. (2004). Teaching students to make better decisions about the environment: Lessons from the decision sciences. The Journal of Environmental Education, 36(1), 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, A. (2003). Teaching science for social justice. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A. (2001). The pedagogical potential of school grounds. In T. Grant & G. Littlejohn (Eds.), Greening school grounds: Creating habitats for learning (pp. 9–11). New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchet-Cohen, N., & Reilly, R. C. (2017). Immigrant children promoting environmental care: Enhancing learning, agency and integration through culturally responsive environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 23(4), 553–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1153046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns, K. (2017). Connecting to food: Cultivating children in the school garden. Children’s Geographies, 15(3), 304–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2016.1221058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C21 Canada (Canadians for 21st Century Learning and Innovation). (2016, Fall). Towards defining 21st century competencies for Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.edugains.ca/resources21CL/21stCenturyLearning/21CL_21stCenturyCompetencies.pdf

  • Canaris, I. (1995). Growing foods for growing minds: Integrating gardening and nutrition education into the total curriculum. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiarotto, L. (2011). Natural curiosity: Building children’s understanding of the world through environmental inquiry. Oshawa: Maracle Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christodoulou, A., & Korfiatis, K. (2019). Children’s interest in school garden projects, environmental motivation and intention to act: A case study from a primary school of Cyprus. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(1), 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2009). Multicultural school gardens: Creating engaging garden spaces in learning about language, culture, and environment. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14(1), 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawe, P., Fawcett, A., & Webb, T. (2020). Learning gardens cultivating health and well-being – Stories from Australia. In D. Hunter, E. Monville-Oro, B. Burgos, C. N. Roel, B. M. Calub, J. Gonsalves, & N. Lauridsen (Eds.), Agrobiodiversity, school gardens and healthy diets: Promoting biodiversity, food and sustainable nutrition (pp. 62–76). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053788.

  • DeCoito, I. (2014). Focusing on science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the 21st century. Ontario Professional Surveyor, 57(1), 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCoito, I. (2015). Developing integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) projects in education. In S. Nesbit & T. M. Froese (Eds.), Proceedings of EESD15: The 7th conference on engineering education for sustainable development (pp. 41–48). Vancouver, Canada: University of British Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeCoito, I. (2019). A longitudinal study: Investigating the impact of an outreach program on students’ future course selection and STEM career choices, phase I. London: Western University. (170 pages).

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMarco, L. W. (1997). The factors affecting elementary school teachers’ integration of school gardening into the curriculum. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blackburg, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2002). Revisiting garden-based learning in basic education: Philosophical roots, historical foundations, best practices and products, impacts, outcomes, and future directions. Prepared for IIEP/FAO, SDRE Food and Agricultural Organization/United Nations, Rome, Italy, UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Toronto: Collier-MacMillan Canada Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyment, J. E., & Reid, A. (2005). Breaking new ground? Reflections of greening school grounds as sites of ecological, pedagogical, and social transformation. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 286–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evergreen. (2006). Grounds for greening. Toronto: Evergreen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, L., Brinkmeyer, D., Karle, S., Cremer, K., Huttner, E., Seebauer, M., Nowikow, U., Schütze, B., Voigt, P., Völker, S., & Kowarik, I. (2019). Biodiverse edible schools: Linking healthy food, school gardens and local urban biodiversity. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 40, 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, C., & Davis, E. (2008). Exploring preservice elementary teachers’ critique and adaptation of science curriculum materials in respect to socioscientific issues. Science and Education, 17(8–9), 829–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonsalves, J., Hunter, D., & Lauridsen, N. (2020). School gardens: Multiple functions and multiple outcomes. In D. Hunter, E. Monville-Oro, B. Burgos, C. N. Roel, B. M. Calub, J. Gonsalves, & N. Lauridsen (Eds.), Agrobiodiversity, school gardens and healthy Diets: promoting biodiversity, food and sustainable nutrition (pp. 1–32). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429053788.

  • Graham, H., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2005). California teachers perceive school gardens as an effective nutritional tool to promote healthful eating habits. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 105(11), 1797–1800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, T., & Littlejohn, G. (2001). Greening school grounds. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D., & Bryce, T. (2006). Socio-scientific issues in science education: Implications for the professional development of teachers. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36, 171–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruenewald, D. (2003). The best of both worlds: A critical pedagogy of place. Educational Researcher, 32(4), 3–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P. (1994). Perspectives of hands-on science teaching. Retrieved January 2, 2015 http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/eric/eric-toc.htm

  • Jose, S., Patrick, P. G., & Moseley, C. (2017). Experiential learning theory: The importance of outdoor classrooms in environmental education. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 7(3), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2016.1272144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Growing minds: The effect of a school gardening program on the science achievement of elementary students. HortTechnology, 15(3), 448–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M. E., & Tidball, K. G. (2009). Applying a resilience systems framework to urban environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krug, D.H. (2014). STEM education and sustainability in Canada and the United States. Paper presented at the 2nd International STEM in Education Conference, Vancouver, BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, D., & Chubin, D. (2000). Science technology and society: A sourcebook or research and practice. Dordrecht, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuru, G., Öztürk, E. D., & Atmaca, F. (2020). A field of learning and living: Suitability of school gardens for children. Elementary Education Online, 19(3), 1450–1464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, V., Romses, K., & Renwick, K. (2019). Exploring the relationship between school gardens, food literacy and mental well-being in youth using photovoice. Nutrients, 11(6), 1354.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H., & Witz, K. G. (2009). Science teachers’ inspiration for teaching socio-scientific issues: Disconnection with reform efforts. International Journal of Science Education, 31, 931–960.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, R. M., Lerner, J. V., Almerigi, J. B., Theokas, C., Phelps, E., Gestsdottir, S., & Eye, A. V. (2005). Positive youth development, participation in community youth development programs, and community contributions of 5th grade adolescents: Findings from the first wave of the 4-H study of positive youth development. Journal of Early Adolescence, 25, 17–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochner, J., Rieckmann, M., & Robischon, M. (2019). Any sign of virtual school garden exchanges? Education for sustainable development in school gardens since 1992: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 13(2), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2002). Garden-enhanced nutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade school children’s knowledge of nutrition and preferences for some vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(24).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (NRC). (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ontario Ministry of Education. (2009). Acting today, shaping tomorrow: A policy framework for environmental education in Ontario schools. Toronto: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. M., Merrigan, K. A., Rogers, B. L., & Goldberg, J. P. (2009). The effects of school garden experiences on middle school-aged students’ knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours associated with vegetable consumption. Health Promotion Practice, 12(1), 36–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, K. (2017). Designing urban agriculture education for social justice: Radical innovation through Farm School NYC. International Journal of Food Design, 2(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.2.1.45_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rios, J. M., & Brewer, J. (2014). Outdoor education and science achievement. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 13(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.975084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. W., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Growing minds: The effects of a one-year school garden program on six constructs of life skills of elementary school children. HortTechnology, 15(3), 453–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscioli, F., Malerba, D., & Burchi, F. (2020). Introducing agroecology in primary schools: An independent impact evaluation in Uruguay. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sealy, M. R. (2001). A garden for children at Family Road Care Center. Graduate faculty of Louisiana State University and Agricultural Mechanical College: School of Landscape Architecture (unpublished Master’s thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sensoy, O., & DiAngelo, R. (2011). Is everyone really equal? An introduction to key concepts in social justice education. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, G. A. (2007). Place-based education: Breaking through the constraining regularities of public school. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, J., & van Barneveld, A. (2009). When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 3(1), 44–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tapper, A. (2013). A pedagogy of social justice education: Social identity theory, intersectionality, and empowerment. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 30(4), 411–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2003). The past and future of mixed methods research: From data triangulation to mixed model designs. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 671–702). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooth, R., & Renshaw, P. (2009). Reflections on pedagogy and place: A journey into learning for sustainability through environmental narrative and deep attentive reflection. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 25, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toronto District School Board (TDSB). (2010). Social justice action plan. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Portals/0/HighSchool/docs/TDSBSocialJusticeActionPlan.pdf

  • Upitis, R., Hughes, S., & Peterson, A. (2013). Promoting environmental stewardship through gardens: A case study of children’s views of an urban school garden program. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 11(1), 92–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waliczek, T. M., Bradley, J. C., Lineberger, R. D., & Zajicek, J. M. (2000). Using a web-based survey to research the benefits of children gardening. HortTechnology, 10(1), 71–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waliczek, T. M., Logan, P., & Zajicek, J. M. (2003). Impact of outdoor environmental activities on children using a qualitative text data analysis system. HortTechnology, 13(4), 684–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver-Hightower, M. B. (2011). Why education researchers should take school food seriously. Educational Researcher, 40(1), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willhelm, S., & Schneider, I. (2005). Diverse urban youth’s nature: Implications for environmental education. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 4, 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S. S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the learning gardens (SciLG): A study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(8), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0104-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isha DeCoito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

DeCoito, I. (2021). Urban Agricultural Experiences: Focusing on Twenty-First Century Learning Skills and Integrating Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Education. In: Esters, L.T., Patchen, A., DeCoito, I., Knobloch, N. (eds) Research Approaches in Urban Agriculture and Community Contexts. Urban Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70030-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics