Abstract
The goal of this chapter is to explore how a motivational model based on self-determination theory can be used as a guide for specifying some of the elements of garden-based education necessary to promote science learning and achievement. This model posits that students’ intrinsic motivation and constructive engagement with garden-based activities are “active ingredients” in their learning, and that programs will succeed in fostering motivation and engagement to the extent that they support key student experiences in the gardens, including feelings of belonging and self-efficacy, and a sense of purpose and ownership for garden-based activities and outcomes. The utility of this framework is illustrated with research from an interdisciplinary collaboration organized around the Learning Gardens Laboratory (LGLab), a garden-based education program grounded in sustainability pedagogy and carried out in cooperation with a middle school serving mostly low-income, minority, and immigrant youth. Analyses of information from 310 sixth and seventh grade students, their 6 Science teachers, and school records collected at multiple time points during the year suggested that, consistent with the motivational model, students’ engagement in garden-based activities predicts improvements across the school year in their science learning in the garden and achievement in science and other core subjects taught in the garden (math and social studies). Moreover, one way in which students’ garden engagement contributes to improvements in learning and achievement is by boosting their engagement in science class. Different patterns of meditational effects were found depending on the target outcome. For science learning in the garden, engagement in the garden and in science class both make unique contributions; for science achievement, the effects of garden engagement are fully mediated by science engagement; and for core achievement, garden engagement contributes to achievement not only directly, but also indirectly – by shaping students’ subsequent engagement in science class. Discussion centers on how this framework can be used to enrich current garden-based education programs as well as to guide future research, including the selection of measures, the generation of motivational hypotheses, and the use of longitudinal designs to study key processes of engagement and learning in the gardens and in science class.
The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group (or LEAG) is an interdisciplinary group of faculty and students from the Department of Psychology and the School of Education at Portland State University and the leadership of Lane Middle School of Portland Public Schools organized around a garden-based education program, the Learning Gardens Laboratory (LGLab). LEAG Faculty: Ellen Skinner, Thomas Kindermann, Dae Yeop Kim, Dilafruz Williams (co-founder of the Learning Gardens Laboratory), Pramod Parajuli (co-founder), Karl Logan (Principal, Lane Middle School), Terri Sing (Asst. Principal), Heather Burns (Coordinator of the LGLab), and Weston Miller. LEAG Students: Lorraine Escribano, Una Chi, Jennifer Pitzer Graham, Amy Henninger, Shawn Mehess, Justin Vollet, Price Johnson, Heather Brule, Shannon Stone, Hyuny Clark-Shim, Jennifer Wood. We gratefully appreciate and acknowledge the contributions of the Garden Educators and volunteers at the LGLab, and the students, families, and teachers at Lane, especially the Science teachers who participated directly in the LGLab.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, J., North, M. W., & Hendren, D. K. (1995). Master garden classroom garden project: An evaluation of the benefits to children. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 256–263.
Association for Science Education Outdoor Science Working Group. (2010). Outdoor science: A co-ordinated approach to high-quality teaching and learning in fieldwork for science education. The Association for Science Education and the Nuffield Foundation.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.
Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12278.
Bircan, H., & Sungur, S. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in science achievement. Science Education International, 27(4), 509–529.
Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369–398.
Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Brynjegard, S. (2001). School gardens: Raising environmental awareness in children (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED452085). San Rafael: School of Education, Dominican University of California.
Burns, H. (2011). Teaching for transformation: (Re)Designing sustainability courses based on ecological principles. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2.
Burns, H., & Miller, W. (2012). The Learning Gardens Laboratory: Teaching sustainability and developing sustainable food systems through unique partnerships. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 2(3), 69–78.
Camasso, M. J., & Jagannathan, R. (2018). Improving academic outcomes in poor urban schools through nature-based learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(2), 263–277.
Canaris, I. (1995). Growing foods for growing minds: Integrating gardening and nutrition education into the total curriculum. Children’s Environments, 12, 264–270.
Capra, F. (2003). The hidden connections: A science for sustainable living. London: Flamingo.
Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2017). Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 12, 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9723-3.
Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.
Collective School Garden Network. (2020). http://www.csgn.org/
Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 23. Self processes in development (pp. 43–77). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African American Youth: Context, self, and action outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493–506.
Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African-American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41–63.
Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2009). Multicultural school gardens: Creating engaging garden spaces in learning about language, culture, and environment. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 122–135.
Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Wiley.
Deci, E. L. (1998). The relation of interest to motivation and human needs: The self-determination theory viewpoint. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 146–162). Kiel: IPN Press.
Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2002). Revisiting garden-based learning in basic education: Philosophical roots, historical foundations, best practices and products, impacts, outcomes, and future directions. Rome/Paris: SDRE Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations/UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.
Diaz, J. M., Warner, L. A., Webb, S., & Barry, D. (2019). Obstacles for school garden program success: Expert consensus to inform policy and practice. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(3), 195–206.
Draper, C., & Freedman, D. (2010). Review and analysis of the benefits, purposes, and motivations associated with community gardening in the United States. Journal of Community Practice, 18(4), 458–492.
Duncan, D. W., Collins, A., Fuhrman, N. E., Knauft, D. A., & Berle, D. C. (2016). The impacts of a school garden program on urban middle school youth. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04174.
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & McIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on adolescents' experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.
Eick, C. J. (1998). Growing with the standards: Experimental garden project. Science Scope, 21(7), 10–14.
Elliott, K. (2015). Broadening participation: Making STEM learning relevant and rigorous for all students. Boston: CADRE-Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education. Education Development Center.
Evergreen. (2000). Nature nurtures: Investigating the potential of school grounds. Toronto: Evergreen.
Feenstra, G., McGrew, S., & Campbell, D. (1999). Entrepreneurial community gardens: Growing food, skills, jobs, and communities. Oakland: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.
Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.
Flanagan, C. (2010). Cultivating failure: How school gardens are cheating our most vulnerable students. The Atlantic Magazine, January/February.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.
Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860–877.
Gaylie, V. (2011). Roots and research in urban school gardens. New York: Peter Lang.
Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.
Graham, S., & Hudley, C. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation and competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 392–413). New York: Guilford.
Hake, B. J. (2017). Gardens as learning spaces: Intergenerational learning in urban food gardens. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(1), 26–38.
Hirschi, J. S. (2017). Ripe for change: Garden-based learning in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Holmgren, D. (2002). Permaculture: Principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Hepburn: Holmgren Design Services.
Hudkins, S. (1995). Parvis e glandibus quercus: “Great oaks from little acorns grow”. Journal of Extension, 33(4) Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1995august/iw6.php.
Jimerson, S. J., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Towards an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.
Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.
Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Development of a science achievement evaluation instrument for a school garden program. HortTechnology, 15, 433–438.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277.
Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (2003). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach. New York: McGraw Hill.
Krasny, M. (2005). Garden Mosaics program manual. Cornell: Cornell University Press.
Krasny, M., & Doyle, R. (2002). Participatory approaches to program development and engaging youth in research: The case of an intergenerational urban community gardening program. Journal of Extension, 40(5), 1–21.
Lawson, L., & McNally, M. (1995). Putting teens at the center: Maximizing public utility of urban space through youth involvement in planning and employment. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 46–65.
Lekies, K., Eames-Sheavly, M., Wong, K., & Ceccarini, A. (2006). Children’s garden consultants: New model of engaging youth to inform garden design and programming. HortTechnology, 16, 139–142.
Lekies, K., Eames-Sheavly, M., McDonald, L., & Wong, K. J. (2007). Greener voices: Strategies to increase the participation of children and youth in gardening activities. Children, Youth, and Environments, 17, 517–526.
Lieberman, G., & Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. San Diego: State Education and Environment Roundtable (SEER).
MacIver, D. J., Young, E. M., & Washburn, B. (2002). Instructional practices and motivation during middle school (with special attention to science). In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 333–351). San Diego: Academic.
Malone, K., & Tranter, P. J. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 283–303.
Meece, J. L., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2001). Introduction: The schooling of ethnic minority children and youth. Educational Psychologist, 36, 1–7.
Moore, R. (1995). Growing foods for growing minds: Integrating gardening and nutrition education into the total curriculum. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 134–142.
Moore, J. (2005). Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 326–339.
Morris, J. L., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2002). Garden-enhanced nutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade school children's knowledge of nutrition and preferences for some vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(1), 91–93.
National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Ozer, E. (2007). The effects of school gardens on students and schools: Conceptualizations and considerations for maximizing healthy development. Health Education and Behavior, 34, 846–863.
Pranis, E. (2004). School gardens measure up. Retrieved from National Gardening Association website: http://garden.org/articles/articles.php?q=show&id-952
Rahm, J. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164–184.
Ratcliffe, M. M., Goldberg, J., Rogers, B., & Merrigan, K. (2010). A model of garden-based education in school settings: Development of a conceptual framework to improve children’s academic achievement, ecoliteracy, health and wellness while enhancing schools, communities, and bioregions. Unpublished manuscript, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.
Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.
Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 373–404). San Diego: Academic.
Richardson, T. A. (2011). At the garden gate: Community building through food. Revisiting the critique of “food, folk and fun” in multicultural education. The Urban Review, 43(1), 107–123.
Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College.
Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100.
Robinson-O’Brien, R., Story, M., & Heim, S. (2009). Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: A review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(2), 273–280.
Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
Skelly, S. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1998). The effect of an interdisciplinary garden program on the environmental attitudes of elementary school students. Hortechnology, 8(4), 579–583.
Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–45). New York: Springer Science.
Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). Malwah: Erlbaum.
Skinner, E. A., Chi, U., & The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and engagement as “active ingredients” in garden-based education: Examining models and measures derived from self-determination theory. Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 16–36.
Smerdon, B. A. (1999). Engagement and achievement: Differences between African-American and white high school students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 103–134.
Smith, L. L., & Motsenbocker, C. E. (2005). Impact of hands-on science through school gardening in Louisiana public elementary schools. HortTechnology, 15(3), 439–443.
Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
Sterling, S. (2004). Sustainable education: Re-envisioning learning and change. Devon: Green Books.
Swarat, A., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 515–537.
Thorp, L. G. (2006). The pull of the earth: Participatory ethnography in the school garden. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 199–216.
Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents; declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095.
Voekl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 295–319.
Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2016). Urban horticulture. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., MacIver, D., Reuman, D. A., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552–565.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th Ed., Vol. 3. pp. 933–1002) (Social, emotional, and personality development). New York: John Wiley.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.) & M. Lamb (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th Ed., Vol. 3, pp. 657–700) (Socioemotional processes). New York: Wiley.
Williams, D. (2018). Garden-based education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.
Williams, D. R., & Dixon, P. S. (2013). Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 211–235.
Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the Learning Gardens (SciLG): A study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0104-9.
Zusho, A., Daddino, J., & Garcia, C. B. (2016). Culture, race, ethnicity, and motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts. Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes (pp. 273–292). New York: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Skinner, E.A., Chi, U., The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2021). What Role Does Motivation and Engagement in Garden-Based Education Play for Science Learning in At-Risk Middle School Students? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In: Esters, L.T., Patchen, A., DeCoito, I., Knobloch, N. (eds) Research Approaches in Urban Agriculture and Community Contexts. Urban Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70030-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70030-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70029-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70030-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)