Skip to main content

What Role Does Motivation and Engagement in Garden-Based Education Play for Science Learning in At-Risk Middle School Students? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Research Approaches in Urban Agriculture and Community Contexts

Abstract

The goal of this chapter is to explore how a motivational model based on self-determination theory can be used as a guide for specifying some of the elements of garden-based education necessary to promote science learning and achievement. This model posits that students’ intrinsic motivation and constructive engagement with garden-based activities are “active ingredients” in their learning, and that programs will succeed in fostering motivation and engagement to the extent that they support key student experiences in the gardens, including feelings of belonging and self-efficacy, and a sense of purpose and ownership for garden-based activities and outcomes. The utility of this framework is illustrated with research from an interdisciplinary collaboration organized around the Learning Gardens Laboratory (LGLab), a garden-based education program grounded in sustainability pedagogy and carried out in cooperation with a middle school serving mostly low-income, minority, and immigrant youth. Analyses of information from 310 sixth and seventh grade students, their 6 Science teachers, and school records collected at multiple time points during the year suggested that, consistent with the motivational model, students’ engagement in garden-based activities predicts improvements across the school year in their science learning in the garden and achievement in science and other core subjects taught in the garden (math and social studies). Moreover, one way in which students’ garden engagement contributes to improvements in learning and achievement is by boosting their engagement in science class. Different patterns of meditational effects were found depending on the target outcome. For science learning in the garden, engagement in the garden and in science class both make unique contributions; for science achievement, the effects of garden engagement are fully mediated by science engagement; and for core achievement, garden engagement contributes to achievement not only directly, but also indirectly – by shaping students’ subsequent engagement in science class. Discussion centers on how this framework can be used to enrich current garden-based education programs as well as to guide future research, including the selection of measures, the generation of motivational hypotheses, and the use of longitudinal designs to study key processes of engagement and learning in the gardens and in science class.

The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group (or LEAG) is an interdisciplinary group of faculty and students from the Department of Psychology and the School of Education at Portland State University and the leadership of Lane Middle School of Portland Public Schools organized around a garden-based education program, the Learning Gardens Laboratory (LGLab). LEAG Faculty: Ellen Skinner, Thomas Kindermann, Dae Yeop Kim, Dilafruz Williams (co-founder of the Learning Gardens Laboratory), Pramod Parajuli (co-founder), Karl Logan (Principal, Lane Middle School), Terri Sing (Asst. Principal), Heather Burns (Coordinator of the LGLab), and Weston Miller. LEAG Students: Lorraine Escribano, Una Chi, Jennifer Pitzer Graham, Amy Henninger, Shawn Mehess, Justin Vollet, Price Johnson, Heather Brule, Shannon Stone, Hyuny Clark-Shim, Jennifer Wood. We gratefully appreciate and acknowledge the contributions of the Garden Educators and volunteers at the LGLab, and the students, families, and teachers at Lane, especially the Science teachers who participated directly in the LGLab.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J., North, M. W., & Hendren, D. K. (1995). Master garden classroom garden project: An evaluation of the benefits to children. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 256–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Science Education Outdoor Science Working Group. (2010). Outdoor science: A co-ordinated approach to high-quality teaching and learning in fieldwork for science education. The Association for Science Education and the Nuffield Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berezowitz, C. K., Bontrager Yoder, A. B., & Schoeller, D. A. (2015). School gardens enhance academic performance and dietary outcomes in children. Journal of School Health, 85(8), 508–518. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bircan, H., & Sungur, S. (2016). The role of motivation and cognitive engagement in science achievement. Science Education International, 27(4), 509–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair, D. (2009). The child in the garden: An evaluative review of the benefits of school gardening. Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. E. (2010). Motivating students to learn (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjegard, S. (2001). School gardens: Raising environmental awareness in children (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED452085). San Rafael: School of Education, Dominican University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, H. (2011). Teaching for transformation: (Re)Designing sustainability courses based on ecological principles. Journal of Sustainability Education, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, H., & Miller, W. (2012). The Learning Gardens Laboratory: Teaching sustainability and developing sustainable food systems through unique partnerships. Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development, 2(3), 69–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camasso, M. J., & Jagannathan, R. (2018). Improving academic outcomes in poor urban schools through nature-based learning. Cambridge Journal of Education, 48(2), 263–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canaris, I. (1995). Growing foods for growing minds: Integrating gardening and nutrition education into the total curriculum. Children’s Environments, 12, 264–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (2003). The hidden connections: A science for sustainable living. London: Flamingo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, A., & Feldman, A. (2017). Cultivation of science identity through authentic science in an urban high school classroom. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 12, 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9723-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H., & Yang, Y. C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Collective School Garden Network. (2020). http://www.csgn.org/

  • Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (1991). Competence, autonomy and relatedness: A motivational analysis of self-system processes. In M. Gunnar & L. A. Sroufe (Eds.), Minnesota symposium on child psychology: Vol. 23. Self processes in development (pp. 43–77). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., Spencer, M. B., & Aber, J. L. (1994). Educational risk and resilience in African American Youth: Context, self, and action outcomes in school. Child Development, 65, 493–506.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J. P., Halpern-Felsher, B. L., Clifford, E., Crichlow, W., & Usinger, P. (1995). Hanging in there: Behavioral, psychological, and contextual factors affecting whether African-American adolescents stay in high school. Journal of Adolescent Research, 10, 41–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2009). Multicultural school gardens: Creating engaging garden spaces in learning about language, culture, and environment. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 14, 122–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (Ed.). (2008). Powerful learning: What we know about teaching for understanding. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1998). The relation of interest to motivation and human needs: The self-determination theory viewpoint. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 146–162). Kiel: IPN Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desmond, D., Grieshop, J., & Subramaniam, A. (2002). Revisiting garden-based learning in basic education: Philosophical roots, historical foundations, best practices and products, impacts, outcomes, and future directions. Rome/Paris: SDRE Food and Agriculture Organization, United Nations/UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz, J. M., Warner, L. A., Webb, S., & Barry, D. (2019). Obstacles for school garden program success: Expert consensus to inform policy and practice. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 18(3), 195–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Draper, C., & Freedman, D. (2010). Review and analysis of the benefits, purposes, and motivations associated with community gardening in the United States. Journal of Community Practice, 18(4), 458–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, D. W., Collins, A., Fuhrman, N. E., Knauft, D. A., & Berle, D. C. (2016). The impacts of a school garden program on urban middle school youth. Journal of Agricultural Education, 57(4), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.5032/jae.2016.04174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C., & McIver, D. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage-environment fit on adolescents' experiences in schools and families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eick, C. J. (1998). Growing with the standards: Experimental garden project. Science Scope, 21(7), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K. (2015). Broadening participation: Making STEM learning relevant and rigorous for all students. Boston: CADRE-Community for Advancing Discovery Research in Education. Education Development Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evergreen. (2000). Nature nurtures: Investigating the potential of school grounds. Toronto: Evergreen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, G., McGrew, S., & Campbell, D. (1999). Entrepreneurial community gardens: Growing food, skills, jobs, and communities. Oakland: University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. D., & Rock, D. A. (1997). Academic success among students at risk for school failure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 221–234.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. (2010). Cultivating failure: How school gardens are cheating our most vulnerable students. The Atlantic Magazine, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fusco, D. (2001). Creating relevant science through urban planning and gardening. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 860–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaylie, V. (2011). Roots and research in urban school gardens. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, A. E., Fleming, J. S., & Gottfried, A. W. (2001). Continuity of academic intrinsic motivation from childhood through late adolescence: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S., & Hudley, C. (2005). Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation and competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 392–413). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, B. J. (2017). Gardens as learning spaces: Intergenerational learning in urban food gardens. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 15(1), 26–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, J. S. (2017). Ripe for change: Garden-based learning in schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmgren, D. (2002). Permaculture: Principles and pathways beyond sustainability. Hepburn: Holmgren Design Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudkins, S. (1995). Parvis e glandibus quercus: “Great oaks from little acorns grow”. Journal of Extension, 33(4) Retrieved from http://www.joe.org/joe/1995august/iw6.php.

  • Jimerson, S. J., Campos, E., & Greif, J. L. (2003). Towards an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Crosnoe, R., & Elder, G. H., Jr. (2001). Students’ attachment and academic engagement: The role of race and ethnicity. Sociology of Education, 74, 318–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemmer, C. D., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2005). Development of a science achievement evaluation instrument for a school garden program. HortTechnology, 15, 433–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krajcik, J. S., Czerniak, C. M., & Berger, C. F. (2003). Teaching science in elementary and middle school classrooms: A project-based approach. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M. (2005). Garden Mosaics program manual. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasny, M., & Doyle, R. (2002). Participatory approaches to program development and engaging youth in research: The case of an intergenerational urban community gardening program. Journal of Extension, 40(5), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, L., & McNally, M. (1995). Putting teens at the center: Maximizing public utility of urban space through youth involvement in planning and employment. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 46–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lekies, K., Eames-Sheavly, M., Wong, K., & Ceccarini, A. (2006). Children’s garden consultants: New model of engaging youth to inform garden design and programming. HortTechnology, 16, 139–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekies, K., Eames-Sheavly, M., McDonald, L., & Wong, K. J. (2007). Greener voices: Strategies to increase the participation of children and youth in gardening activities. Children, Youth, and Environments, 17, 517–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, G., & Hoody, L. (1998). Closing the achievement gap: Using the environment as an integrating context for learning. San Diego: State Education and Environment Roundtable (SEER).

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIver, D. J., Young, E. M., & Washburn, B. (2002). Instructional practices and motivation during middle school (with special attention to science). In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), The development of achievement motivation (pp. 333–351). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, K., & Tranter, P. J. (2003). School grounds as sites for learning: Making the most of environmental opportunities. Environmental Education Research, 9(3), 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meece, J. L., & Kurtz-Costes, B. (2001). Introduction: The schooling of ethnic minority children and youth. Educational Psychologist, 36, 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. (1995). Growing foods for growing minds: Integrating gardening and nutrition education into the total curriculum. Children’s Environments, 12(2), 134–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2005). Seven recommendations for creating sustainability education at the university level. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 6(4), 326–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. L., & Zidenberg-Cherr, S. (2002). Garden-enhanced nutrition curriculum improves fourth-grade school children's knowledge of nutrition and preferences for some vegetables. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 102(1), 91–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2004). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. (2007). The effects of school gardens on students and schools: Conceptualizations and considerations for maximizing healthy development. Health Education and Behavior, 34, 846–863.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pranis, E. (2004). School gardens measure up. Retrieved from National Gardening Association website: http://garden.org/articles/articles.php?q=show&id-952

  • Rahm, J. (2002). Emergent learning opportunities in an inner-city youth gardening program. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. M., Goldberg, J., Rogers, B., & Merrigan, K. (2010). A model of garden-based education in school settings: Development of a conceptual framework to improve children’s academic achievement, ecoliteracy, health and wellness while enhancing schools, communities, and bioregions. Unpublished manuscript, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students’ engagement by increasing teachers’ autonomy support. Motivation and Emotion, 28, 147–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A. (2000). Individual interest and its implications for understanding intrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 373–404). San Diego: Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, T. A. (2011). At the garden gate: Community building through food. Revisiting the critique of “food, folk and fun” in multicultural education. The Urban Review, 43(1), 107–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Choi, M. Y., Sanders, D., & Benefield, P. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. London: National Foundation for Educational Research and King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivet, A. E., & Krajcik, J. S. (2008). Contextualizing instruction: Leveraging students’ prior knowledge and experiences to foster understanding of middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson-O’Brien, R., Story, M., & Heim, S. (2009). Impact of garden-based youth nutrition intervention programs: A review. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109(2), 273–280.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M. (2000). Peer groups as a context for the socialization of adolescents’ motivation, engagement, and achievement in school. Educational Psychologist, 35, 101–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly, S. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1998). The effect of an interdisciplinary garden program on the environmental attitudes of elementary school students. Hortechnology, 8(4), 579–583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), The Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 21–45). New York: Springer Science.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kindermann, T. (2008). Engagement and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., & Furrer, C. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009a). Engagement as an organizational construct in the dynamics of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223–245). Malwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. A., Chi, U., & The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2012). Intrinsic motivation and engagement as “active ingredients” in garden-based education: Examining models and measures derived from self-determination theory. Journal of Environmental Education, 43(1), 16–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smerdon, B. A. (1999). Engagement and achievement: Differences between African-American and white high school students. Research in Sociology of Education and Socialization, 12, 103–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. L., & Motsenbocker, C. E. (2005). Impact of hands-on science through school gardening in Louisiana public elementary schools. HortTechnology, 15(3), 439–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In S. Leinhardt (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterling, S. (2004). Sustainable education: Re-envisioning learning and change. Devon: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swarat, A., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorp, L. G. (2006). The pull of the earth: Participatory ethnography in the school garden. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2011). Adolescents’ declining motivation to learn science: Inevitable or not? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 199–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedder-Weiss, D., & Fortus, D. (2012). Adolescents; declining motivation to learn science: A follow-up study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 1057–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voekl, K. E. (1997). Identification with school. American Journal of Education, 105, 295–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (2016). Urban horticulture. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1993). Does being good make the grade? Social behavior and academic competence in middle school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 357–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., MacIver, D., Reuman, D. A., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions during early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Schiefele, U., Roeser, R., & Davis-Kean, P. (2006). Development of achievement motivation. In W. Damon (Series Ed.) & N. Eisenberg (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology (6th Ed., Vol. 3. pp. 933–1002) (Social, emotional, and personality development). New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner (Series Ed.) & M. Lamb (Volume Ed.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science (7th Ed., Vol. 3, pp. 657–700) (Socioemotional processes). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. (2018). Garden-based education. In Oxford research encyclopedia of education. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., & Dixon, P. S. (2013). Impact of garden-based learning on academic outcomes in schools: Synthesis of research between 1990 and 2010. Review of Educational Research, 83(2), 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. R., Brule, H., Kelley, S., & Skinner, E. A. (2018). Science in the Learning Gardens (SciLG): A study of students’ motivation, achievement, and science identity in low-income middle schools. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0104-9.

  • Zusho, A., Daddino, J., & Garcia, C. B. (2016). Culture, race, ethnicity, and motivation. In K. R. Wentzel & G. B. Ramani (Eds.), Handbook of social influences in school contexts. Social-emotional, motivation, and cognitive outcomes (pp. 273–292). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ellen A. Skinner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Skinner, E.A., Chi, U., The Learning-Gardens Educational Assessment Group. (2021). What Role Does Motivation and Engagement in Garden-Based Education Play for Science Learning in At-Risk Middle School Students? A Self-Determination Theory Perspective. In: Esters, L.T., Patchen, A., DeCoito, I., Knobloch, N. (eds) Research Approaches in Urban Agriculture and Community Contexts. Urban Agriculture. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70030-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics