Abstract
After the fall of the Berlin wall and Eastern regimes of Socialism in Central Eastern Europe during the transition into capitalism, many countries suffered a drastic decline in their technological competences, technological transfers, and research activities following the 1990s. This research seeks to assess whether or not the policy of technology transfer practiced during the socialist era improved for these countries following their entry to a capitalist regime and their subsequent joining of the European Union. Croatia is used as an example of a typical transition country with a specific type of market socialism, with controversial outcomes arising from its particular transition process in comparison to its peers. Despite the assistance of the European Union, which helped many new members from socialist backgrounds to recover their economies by upgrading their technological capabilities, the technology transfer practices in the Republic of Croatia continues to unfold very slowly. Technological transfer occurs as a highly contextual phenomenon, dependent not only on the structure of the economy and technological and research capacities, but also on the political economy and the type of capitalism. This research identifies the three phases of the evolution of university technology transfer: science-based models in socialism; endeavors towards an innovation-based model throughout the transition period; and the bureaucratic model, driven by the EU cohesion policy and facilitated through access to the European Structural Funds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsChange history
30 December 2021
Please note that the original (printed and online) version of this book, unfortunately, contained some errors. The corrections are:
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Further details, visit https://rio.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/country-analysis/Croatia/country-report
- 3.
The projects were made within bilateral cooperation of the Ministry and the German Federal Ministry of Research, Science, Education and Technology using the expertise of FhG-ISI, Karlsruhe and VDI/VDE-IT, Berlin and with the Business Innovation Centre Friuli -Venezia Giulia, Trieste
- 4.
For further details, visit http://www.step.uniri.hr/o-nama
- 5.
Further details, visit: https://strukturnifondovi.hr/en/eu-fondovi/esi-fondovi-2014-2020/op-konkurentnost-i-kohezija/
References
Acs, J. Z., & Audretsch, B. D. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and technological change. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship., 1(4), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000004.
Acs, J. Z., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2017). National system of innovation. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 997–1008. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9481-8.
Acs, Z., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016.
Allen, T., & O’Shea, R. (Eds.). (2014). Building technology transfer within research universities: An entrepreneurial approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archibugi, D., & Filippetti, A. (2011). Is the economic crisis impairing convergence in innovation performance across Europe? Jcms-J Common Mark S, 49, 1153–1182. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02191.x.
Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2000). Capitalism and democracy in the 21st century: From the managed to the entrepreneurial economy. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10(1), 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050003.
Audretsch, D. B. (2007). Entrepreneurship capital and economic growth. Oxford Rev Econ Pol, 23(1), 63–78.
Audretsch, D. B. (2018). Entrepreneurship, economic growth, and geography. Oxford Rev Econ Pol, 34(4), 637–651.
Audretsch, D. B., & Caiazza, R. (2016). Technology transfer and entrepreneurship: Cross-national analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 1247–1259. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1096.1-015-9441-8.
Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E., & Wright, M. (2012). Technology transfer in a global economy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9283-6.
Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. N. (2018). Innovation capital. Journal of Technology Transfer, 43, 1760–1767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1096.1-018-9700-6.
Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.
Balconi, M., Brusoni, S., & Orsenigo, L. (2010). In defence of the linear model: An essay. Research Policy, 39(1), 1–13.
Bartllet, W. (2003). Croatia between Europe and the Balkans. London: Routledge.
Bečić, E., Švarc, J. (2015) Smart specialisation in Croatia: between the cluster and technological specialisation, Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 270–295, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0238-7.
Block, J. H., Thurik, R., & Zhou, H. (2013). What turns knowledge into innovative products? The role of entrepreneurship and knowledge spillovers. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 23(4), 693–718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s0019.1-012-0265-5.
Bonaccorsi, A. (2016). Addressing the disenchantment: Universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20, 293. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487.870.2016.1212711.
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., & Youtiem, J. (2015). The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: Revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Research Policy, 44, 34–49.
Breznitz, S. M., & Etzkowitz, H. (Eds.). (2016). University technology transfer: The globalization of academic innovation. New York: Routledge.
Breznitz, S. M., & Feldman, M. P. (2010). The engaged university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/10961-010-9183-6.
Burhan, N. A. S., Razak, R. C., Salleh, F., Labastida, M. E., & Tovar, M. E. L. (2017). The higher intelligence of the ‘creative minority’ provides the infrastructure for entrepreneurial innovation. Intelligence, 65, 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2017.09.007.
Carlsson, B., Braunerhjelm, P., McKelvey, M., Olofsson, C., Persson, L., & Ylinenpaa, H. (2013). The evolving domain of entrepreneurship research. Small Business Economics, 42, 913–930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9503-y.
CBS. (2019). Statistical reports: Research and development, 2017. Zagreb: Croatian Bureau of Statistics.
Čepo, D. (2020). Structural weaknesses and the role of the dominant political party: democratic backsliding in Croatia since EU accession. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2020.1709721.
Dabić, M., Daim, T., Bayraktaroglu, E., Novak, I., & Bašić, M. (2012). Exploring gender differences in attitudes of university students towards entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 316–336.
Dabić, M., Gonzalez-Loureiro, M., & Daim, T. U. (2015a). Unraveling the attitudes on entrepreneurial universities: The case of Croatian and Spanish universities. Technology in Society, 42, 167–178.
Dabić, M., Švarc, J., & Bečić, E. (2015b). A multidimensional approach to the environment for entrepreneurship in selected CE countries. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 3–4(3), 295–328.
Dabić, M., Švarc, J., & González-Loureiro, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial universities in innovation-seeking countries: Challenges and opportunities. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dabić, M., Lažnjak, J., Smallbone, D., & Švarc, J. (2019). Intellectual capital, organisational climate, innovation culture, and SME performance: Evidence from Croatia. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 26(4), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2018-0117.
Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). The relationship between science, technologies and their industrial exploitation: An illustration through the myths and realities of the so-called “European paradox”. Research Policy, 35, 1450–1464.
Drucker, P. F. (1985). Innovation and entrepreneurship. New York: Harper and Row.
Dyker, D. A. (2011). Yugoslavia: Socialism, development, and debt. New York: Routledge.
Dyker, D. A., & Radošević, S. (Eds.). (1999). Innovation and structural change in post-socialist countries: A quantitative approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Dyker, D. A., & Vejvoda, I. (Eds.). (2014). Yugoslavia and after: A study in fragmentation, despair and rebirth. London: Routledge.
Edquist, C. (2011). Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: Identification of systemic problems (or failures). Industrial and Corporate Change, 20, 1725. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr06.0.
Edquist, C., & Lundvall, B. A. (1993). Comparing the Danish and Swedish systems of innovation. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems: A comparative analysis (pp. 265–298). New York: Oxford University Press.
EIS. (2019). European innovation scoreboard 2019. European Union, Luxembourg. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards/. Accessed 5 Mart 2020.
Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2011). Entrepreneurship in transition economies: The role of institutions and generational change. In M. Minniti (Ed.), The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Evidence from global entrepreneurship (pp. 181–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. London: Taylor and Francis Group.
Etzkowitz, H., & Viale, R. (2010). Polyvalent knowledge and the entrepreneurial university: A third academic revolution? Critical Sociology, 36(4), 595–609.
Eurofast. (2017). Croatian tech companies drive economic growth and development. Post available at: https://eurofast.eu/2017/11/01/croatian-tech-companies-drive-economic-growth-and-development/#. Accessed 4 March 2020.
European Commission. (2000). Towards a European research area, Brussels, 18 January 2000, [COM(2000), (Lisbon agenda)], European Commission, Brussels.
European Commission. (2015). Country report Croatia 2015, (European Semester), SWD (2015) 30 final, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/csr2015/cr2015_croatia_en.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2017.
European Commission. (2019). Country Report Croatia 2019, European Semester, SWD(2019) 1010 final, European Commission, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/2019-european-semester-country-report-croatia_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Mart 2020.
European Commission. (2020). Country report Croatia 2020: 2020 European Semester, SWD(2020) 510 final, Brussels. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/2020-european_semester_country-report-croatia_en.pdf. Accessed 25 Mart 2020.
Foray, D., David, P. A., & Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation—The concept, knowledge economists. Policy Brief No. 9. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no9.pdf. Accessed 15th Sept 2018.
Franičević, V., & Bićanić, I. (2007). EU accession and Croatia’s two economic goals: Modern economic growth and modern regulated capitalism. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 7, 637–663.
Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: A new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi et al. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–349). London: Pinter Publisher Limited.
Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. P. (2014). Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy, 43(7), 1177–1188.
Gault, F. (2018). Defining and measuring innovation in all sectors of the economy. Research Policy, 47, 617–622.
Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.
Gibson, E., Daim, T. U., & Dabic, M. (2019). Evaluating university industry collaborative research centers. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 146, 181–202.
González-Cruz, T., & Devece, C. (2018). Entrepreneurial innovation, judgment, and decision-making as a virtuous process. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 14(2), 245–248.
Grodzicki, M. J. (2014). Global value chain and competitiveness of V4 economies (chapter 1). In D. Kiendl-Wendner & K. Wach (Eds.), International competitiveness in Visegrad countries: Macro and micro perspectives (pp. 13–31). Gratz: Fachhochschule Joanneum.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2017). The impact of Triple Helix agents on entrepreneurial innovations’ performance: An inside look at enterprises located in an emerging economy. Technological Forecasting and Social, 119, 294–309.
Guerrero, M., Urbano, D., & Fayolle, A. (2016). Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: Evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 105–131.
Guerrero, M., Cunningham, J. A., & Urbano, D. (2015). Economic impact of entrepreneurial universities’ activities: An exploratory study of the United Kingdom. Research Policy, 44(3), 748–764.
Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2019). Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(5), 1347–1366.
Hanson, P., & Pavitt, K. (1987). The comparative economics of research development and innovation in east and west: A survey. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.
Högselius, P. (2003). Can east European countries innovate? Paper prepared for the DRUID winter conference, Aalborg, 16–18 January.
IDIS. (1980). Science in Yugoslavia. Zagreb: Institute of Social Research (IDIS). (in Croatian).
Ignatov, A. (2017). Entrepreneurial innovation: The European Union perspective. Review of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.2478/revecp-2018-0008.
Jeleč Raguž, M., & Mujić Mehičić, N. (2017). The influence of science–industry collaboration on firms’ innovative performance—Evidence from the Republic of Croatia. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 30(1), 992–1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2017.1314819. Accessed 15th Aug 2018.
Kergroach, S. (2018). National innovation policies for technology upgrading through GVCs: A crosscountry comparison. Technol Forecast Soc.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.033.
Kornai, J. (2010). Innovation and dynamism: Interaction between systems and technical progress. The Economics of Transition, 18, 629–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2010.00396.x.
Krammer, S. M. S. (2009). Drivers of national innovation in transition: Evidence from a panel of eastern European countries. Research Policy, 38(5), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.01.022.
Kshetri, N. (2009). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies: A typology and institutional contexts for market entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7(3), 236–259.
Kuhlmann, S. (2001). Future governance of innovation policy in Europe—Three scenarios. Research Policy, 30(6), 953–976.
Landström, H., & Harirchi, G. (2018). The social structure of entrepreneurship as a scientific field. Research Policy, 47, 650–662.
Lange, S., & Švarc, J. (Eds.). (1994). Conceptual approaches for an industry-related promotion of R&D in croatia. Julich: Workshop proceedings. Forschungszentrum Julich GmbH.
Liargovas, P., Petropoulos, S., Tzifakis, N., & Huliaras, A. (Eds.). (2016). Beyond “absorption”: The impact of EU structural funds on Greece. Athens: Konrad-Adenauer Stiftung.
López Mendoza, X. P., & Mauricio Sanchez, D. S. (2018). A systematic literature review on technology transfer from university to industry. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 2(2), 197. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijbsr.2018.10010090.
Lovrinčević, Ž., & Teodorović, I. (1998). Condition and tendencies of the Croatian economy in the period1994 to 1998. Ekonomski pregled, 49(7–8), 699–717. (in Croatian).
Mačkić, V. (2019). Budgetary effects of clientelism, lecture at the conference Clientelism in Croatia, Centre for Democracy and Law Miko Tripalo, 14 February 2019, Zagreb (In Croatian).
Martinović Klarić, I. (2019). Croatian Science Foundation. Presentation of the Croatian Science Foundation at the Ivo Pilar Institute, Zagreb, 25 April, 2019.
MEEC. (2018). 150 successful entrepreneurial projects, Ministry of economy, Entrepreneurship and Crafts, Zagreb. https://www.mingo.hr/public/documents/MGPO_Brosura_150_projekata.pdf. [22 June 2019]. Accessed Oct 2020.
Meske, W. (Ed.). (2000a). From system transformation to European integration: Science and technology in Central and Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 21st century. Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Meske, W. (2000b). Science and technology in CEECs in the socialist era. In W. Meske (Ed.), From systemtransformation to European integration: Science and technology in Central and Eastern Europe at the beginning of the 21st century (pp. 7–27). Piscataway: Transaction Publishers.
Miller, K., Alexander, A., Cunningham, J. A., & Albats, E. (2018). Entrepreneurial academics and academic entrepreneurs: A systematic literature review. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 77(1–3), 9–38.
MoST. (2002). Croatian program for innovative technological development (HITRA): Collected programmatic papers. Zagreb: Ministry of Science and Technology.
Mrozewski, M., & Kratzer, J. (2017). Entrepreneurship and country-level innovation: Investigating the role of entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1125–1142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9479-2.
Mršić, A. (2018). The processes of defining the problems and priorities in innovation policy making in Croatia from the perspective of discursive institutionalism. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Political Sciences, Doctoral Dissertation (in Croatian).
Muscio, A., Reid, A., & Rivera Leon, L. (2015). An empirical test of the regional innovation paradox: Can smart specialisation overcome the paradox in central and Eastern Europe? Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 18(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2015.1013545.
Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: An interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31, 1467–1479.
Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Polit, 61, 670–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468385070.17261.04.
OECD. (1992). Technology and economy: The key relationships. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (1998). Science, technology and industry outlook. Paris: OECD.
OECD. (2001). The new economy: Beyond the hype. Paris: OECD.
Paunov, C., & Planes-Satorra, S. (2019). How are digital technologies changing innovation?: Evidence from agriculture, the automotive industry and retail. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 74, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/67bbcafe-en.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Brostrom, A., D’Este, P., et al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.
Pisk, K. (2001). Cooperation of science and industry, presentation at the fifth multidisciplinary conference: crhr for the Croatian economy. Zagreb: Croatian Academy of Engineering and Croatian Systems Society. (in Croatian).
Prpić, K. (2003). Social marginalization of science and development of the Croatian research potentials. Drustvena istrazivanja, 12(1–2), 45–68. (in Croatian).
Radas, S. (2006). Collaboration between industry and science: Motivation factors, collaboration intensity and collaboration outcome. Croatian Economic Survey, 8(1), 11–31.
Radosević, S. (1994). Strategic technology policy for Eastern Europe. Economic Systems, 18(2), 87–116.
Radosević, S. (1996). Restructuring of R&D institutes in post-socialistic economies: Emerging patterns andissues. In A. Webster (Ed.), Building new bases for innovation: The transformation of the R&D systemin post-socialist states (pp. 8–31). Cambridge: Anglia Polytechnic University.
Radošević, S. (2006). Research and development, competitiveness and European integration of South Eastern Europe. Europe–Asia Stud, 61(4), 621–650.
Radošević, D. (2013). Development strategy for Croatia 2014–2020. Ekonomski pregled, 64(3), 187–212. (in Croatian).
Radošević, S. (2018). Assessing EU smart specialization policy in a comparative perspective. In S. Radosevic et al. (Eds.), Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization (pp. 2–31). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Radošević, S., Curaj, A., Gheorghiu, R., Andreescu, L., & Wade, I. (Eds.). (2018). Advances in the theory and practice of smart specialization. Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Social Text, 51, 9–38.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.
Silva, C. E., Esteves, F., Narcizo, R. B., & Cardoso, R. (2018). Concepts and criteria for the characterization of the entrepreneurial university: A systematic literature review. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 6(3), 65–71.
Singer, S., Šarlija, N., Pfeifer, S., & Oberman, P. S. (2018). Global entrepreneurship monitor Croatia 2016: What makes Croatia a (non-)entrepreneurial country? Zagreb: CEPOR. (in Croatian).
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (2001). Expanding and elaborating the concept of academic capitalism. Organization, 8(2), 154–161.
Staehr, K. (2011). Democratic and market-economic reforms in the post-communist countries. Eastern European Economics, 49(5), 5–28. https://doi.org/10.2753/eee00.12-87754.90501.
Šimić-Banović, R. (2018). Uhljeb – A post-socialist homo croaticus: A personification of the economy of favours in Croatia? Post-Communist Economies, 31(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1537708.
Surubaru, N. C. (2020). European funds in central and Eastern Europe: Drivers of change or mere funding transfers? Evaluating the impact of European aid on national and local development in Bulgaria and Romania, European Politics and Society, online. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2020.1729049.
Stipetić, V. (2012). Two centuries of the Croatian economy (1820–2005). Zagreb: HAZU. (in Croatian).
Stojčić, N. (2020). Collaborative innovation in emerging innovation systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09792-8.
Švarc, J. (2006). Socio-political factors and the failure of innovation policy in Croatia as a country in transition. Research Policy, 35(1), 144–159.
Švarc, J. (2011). Does Croatian national innovation system (NIS) follow the path towards knowledge economy? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 10(2), 131–151.
Švarc, J. (2014). A triple helix systems approach to strengthening the innovation potential of the Western Balkan countries. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 3(3), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTIS.2014.06569.8.
Švarc, J. (2017). Socio-political approach in exploring the innovation culture in post-socialist countries: The case of Croatia. Post-Communist Economies, 29(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.13150.01.
Švarc, J., Čengić, D., Poljanec-Borić, S., & Lažnjak, J. (2019). Scientists’ attitudes about 2013 science reforms: A critical analysis. Politička Misao, 56(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.20901/pm.56.1.01. (In Croatian).
Švarc, J., Dabić, M., & Tugrul, D. (2020). A new innovation paradigm: European cohesion policy and the retreat of public science in countries in Europe’s scientific periphery. Thunderbird International Business Review, 62(5), 531–547. https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.22166.
Szerb, L. A., Acs, Z., & Autio, E. (2013a). Entrepreneurship and policy: The national system of entrepreneurship in the European Union and in its member countries. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 3(1), 9–34.
Szerb, L., Aidis, R., & Acs, J. Z. (2013b). The comparison of the global entrepreneurship monitor and the global entrepreneurship and development index methodologies. Foundations and Trend in Entrepreneurship, 9, 1–142. https://doi.org/10.1561/03000.00046.
Thurik, A. R., Stam, E., & Audretsch, D. B. (2013). The rise of the entrepreneurial economy and the future of dynamic capitalism. Technovation, 33(8–9), 302–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovati.on.2013.07.003.
Uvalić, M. (2018). The rise and fall of market socialism in Yugoslavia DOC Research Institute, special report. https://doc-research.org/2018/03/rise-fall-market-socialism-yugoslavia/. Accessed 23 Sept 2018.
Vehovec, M., & Radas, S. (2006). Industry science collaboration in Croatia: Academics’ view. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 3(83), 345–369.
Vuković, V., Štulhofer, A., & Burić, I. (2017). Was Županov right? Testing the origin and persistence of the egalitarian syndrome. Drustvena Istrazivanja, 26(2), 207–225. https://doi.org/10.5559/di.26.2.04. (in Croatian).
Wahab, S. A., Rose, R., & Osman, S. I. W. (2012). Defining the concepts of technology and technology transfer: A literature analysis. International Business Research, 5(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.5539/ibr.v5n1p.61.
World Bank. (2013). Country papers series: Croatia, technical assistance project (P123211), World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/eca/Western-Balkans-R&D-Croatia.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2020.
World Bank. (2012). Croatia partnership country program snapshot, World Bank, April 2012. https://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/Worldbank/document/CroatiaSnapshotApril2012.pdf. Accessed 12 Apr 2020.
World Bank. (2018). Croatia – systematic country diagnostic. World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/452231526559636808/Croatia-Systematic-Country-Diagnostic. Accessed 28 Feb 2020.
Županov, J. (2001). The industrializing and de-industrializing elite in Croatia in the second half of the 20th century. In D. Čengić & I. Rogić (Eds.), Ruling elites within an analytic perspective (pp. 11–37). Zagreb: Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar. (in Croatian).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Švarc, J., Dabić, M. (2021). Socialism to Capitalism: Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurship in the Republic of Croatia. In: Guerrero, M., Urbano, D. (eds) Technology Transfer and Entrepreneurial Innovations. International Studies in Entrepreneurship, vol 51. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70022-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70022-5_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70021-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70022-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)