Skip to main content

Optimization and Effect Analysis of Sustainable Micro Electrochemical Machining Using Organic Electrolyte

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Futuristic Trends in Intelligent Manufacturing

Part of the book series: Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology ((MFMT))

  • 647 Accesses

Abstract

Electrochemical Micromachining (EMM) is a non-conventional technique that has the potential to provide excellent accuracy due to its ionic dissolution nature. The technique is evolving rapidly with continuous research works and emerging as a frontline technology in the micro-fabrication domain. The dominant input factors of electrochemical machining (ECM) process become very sensitive at micro-domain and parametric optimization is inevitable for enhanced performance. New researches are required to enhance every aspect of the processing system that includes electric power, electrolyte, feed mechanism, gap control etc. The aim of the current work is to produce micro-holes on SS-304 sheet using tungsten tool and citric acid electrolyte through EMM process. An EMM device fabricated for experimentation purpose with pulse generator was utilized in this research. The operating factors preferred for study are voltage, current, pulse-on-time & electrolyte concentration. Taguchi’s L9 design for trials and Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) for multi response optimization were employed. The optimum set of parameters obtained through GRA included 12 V,1.2 A, 15 ms of pulse-on-time period and 20 g/l of solution concentration. The most influential factor observed was pulse-on-time. Though machining was slow with citric acid as electrolyte, holes produced were of good accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bhattacharyya, B. (2015). Electrochemical micromachining for nanofabrication, MEMS and nanotechnology. UK: William Andrew Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mouliprasanth, B., & Hariharan, P. (2020). Scaling approach towards electrochemical micromachining: A method to evaluate similarity. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. (Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05604-3.

  3. Schuster, R., Kirchner, V., Allongue, P., & Ertl, G. (2000). Electrochemical micromachining. Science, 289, 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharya, B., Doloi, B., & Sridhar, P. S. (2001). Electrochemical micro-machining: New possibilities for micro-manufacturing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 113, 301–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mithu, M. A. H., Fantoni, G., & Ciampi, J. (2011). A step towards the in process monitoring for electrochemical microdrilling. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 57, 969–982. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3355-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghoshal, B., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2013). Influence of vibration on micro-tool fabrication by electrochemical machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 64, 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Thanigaivelan, R., & Arunachalam, R. M. (2010). Experimental study on the influence of tool electrode tip shape on electrochemical micromachining of 304 Stainless steel. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 25, 1181–1185.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rathod, V., Doloi, B., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2014). Sidewall insulation of microtool for electrochemical micromachining to enhance the machining accuracy. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 29(3), 305–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2013.864407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jain, V. K., Kalia, S., Sidpara, A., & Kulkarni, V. N. (2012). Fabrication of micro-features and micro-tools using electrochemical micromachining. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 61(9–12), 1175–1183.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, Q., Xiao, J., & Li, Y. (2011). Experimental study on the through-mask electrochemical micromachining (EMM) Process. Advanced Materials Research, 189–193, 69–692. (Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar, S., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2018). Electrochemical micromachining of micro square pattern using reusable masked tool. Materials and manufacturing processes. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426914.2018.1532582.

  12. Pooranachandran, K., Deepak, J., Hariharan, P. & Mouliprasanth, B. (2019). Effect of flushing on electrochemical micromachining of copper and inconel 718 alloy. Advances in Manufacturing Processes, Lecture Notes, in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1724-8_6.

  13. Geethapriyan, T., Manoj Samson, R, Thavamani, J., Arun Raj, A. C., & Pulagam, B. R. (2019). Experimental investigation of electrochemical micro-machining process parameters on stainless steel 316 using sodium chloride electrolyte. Advances in Manufacturing Processes, Lecture Notes, in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1724-8_6.

  14. Subburam, V., Ramesh, S., Mohan Kumar, P. N., & Srinivasan, A. (2018). Performance optimization of electrochemical micromachining of micro-holes on inconel 625 alloy. International Journal of Precision Technology, 8(1), 66–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramesh, S., & Subburam, V. (2019). Electrochemical micromachining of aluminium alloy composite. Advances in Manufacturing Technology, Lecture notes in Mechanical Engineering, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6374-0_36.

  16. Hackert-Oschatzchen, M., Lehnert, N., Martin, A., & Schubert, A. (2016). Jet-electrochemical machining of particle reinforced aluminum matrix composites with different neutral electrolytes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 118, 012036.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Subburam, V., Ramesh, S., Arunachalam, R. M., & Thanigaivelan, R. (2013). Effect of acidified electrolyte on the performance of electrochemical micromachining, in Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Advances in Materials Processing and Characterisation (AMPC 2013), vol. II, pp. 799–806.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tang, L., & Yang, S. (2013). Experimental investigation on the electrochemical machining of 00Cr12Ni9Mo4Cu2 material and multi-objective parameters optimization. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 2909–2916.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, J., Zhu, D., Zhao, L., & Xu, Z. (2015). Experimental investigation on electrochemical machining of γ-TiAl intermetallic, 15th machining innovations conference for aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP, 35, 20–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ryu, S. H. (2009). Micro fabrication by electrochemical process in citric acid electrolyte. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209, 2831–2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.06.044.

  21. Huaiqian, B., Jiawen, X., & Ying, L. (2008). Aviation-oriented micromachining technology—micro-ECM in pure water. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 21, 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Schulze, H. P., & Schatzing, W. (2013). Influences of different contaminations on the electro-erosive and the electrochemical micro-machining, The Seventeenth CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining (ISEM), Procedia CIRP, vol. 6, pp. 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suresh, P., Venkatesan, R., Sekar, T., Elango, N., & Sathiyamoorthy, V. (2014). Optimization of intervening variables in micro EDM of SS316L using a genetic a algorithm and response-surface methodology, strojniski vestnik. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 60(10), 656–664. https://doi.org/10.5545/sv-jme.2014.1665.

  24. Sathiyamoorthy, V., Sekar, T., & Elango, N. (2015). Optimization of processing parameters in ECM of die tool steel using nanofluid by multiobjective genetic algorithm, Article ID895696. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/895696.

  25. Sathiyamoorthy, V., Sekar, T., Suresh, P., Vijayan, R., & Elango, N. (2015). optimization of processing parameters in electrochemical machining of AISI 202 using response surface methodology. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 10(6), 780–789.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Krishnan, R., Duraisamy, S., Palanisamy, P., & Veeramani, A. (2018). Optimization of the machining parameters in the electrochemical micro-machining of nickel. Materials and technology, 52(3), 253–258.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wang, M., Shang, Y., He, K., Xuefeng, X., & Chen, G. (2019). Optimization of nozzle inclination and process parameters in air-shielding electrochemical micromachining. Micromachines, 10, 846. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi10120846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Leese, R., & Ivanov, A. (2018). Electrochemical micromachining: Review of factors affecting the process applicability in micro-manufacturing. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 232(2) 195–207. (sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav). https://doi.org/10.1177/0954405416640172.

  29. Deng, J. (1989). Introduction to grey theory. Journal of Grey Systems, 1(1), 1–2.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Bhattacharyya, B., Munda, J., & Malapati, M. (2004). Advancement in electrochemical micro-machining. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 44(15), 1577–1589.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bilgi, D. S., Jain, V. K., Shekhar, R., et al. (2007). Hole quality and inter electrode gap dynamics during pulse current electrochemical deep hole drilling. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 34(1–2), 79–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ayyappan, S., & Sivakumar, K. (2015). Investigation of electrochemical machining characteristics of 20MnCr5 alloy steel using potassium dichromate mixed aqueous NaCl electrolyte and optimization of process parameters. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 229, 1984–1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ghoshal, B., & Bhattacharyya, B. (2013). Micro electrochemical sinking and milling method for generation of micro features. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 227(11), 1651–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Subburam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Subburam, V., Ramesh, S., Freitas, L.I. (2021). Optimization and Effect Analysis of Sustainable Micro Electrochemical Machining Using Organic Electrolyte. In: Palanikumar, K., Natarajan, E., Sengottuvelu, R., Davim, J.P. (eds) Futuristic Trends in Intelligent Manufacturing. Materials Forming, Machining and Tribology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70009-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70009-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-70008-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-70009-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics