Abstract
Dynamic evaluation mechanisms of the human upper limb are of great value for research and applications in upper limb rehabilitation, especially for the development of robotic upper limb rehabilitation systems. This paper proposes a muscle force prediction method based on the Hill muscle model. The proposed approach, which combines sEMG signals and kinematic data, provides a deep understanding of the dynamic motion mechanisms and parameters that characterize the upper limbs of the human body. The study provides a theoretical benchmark for the evaluation of rehabilitation training practices and for improved designs of upper limb rehabilitation robots that are used for upper limb neuro-rehabilitation. Specifically, the system collected motion data and sEMG signals from the upper limbs of the human body through a high-speed infrared motion capture system and skin sEMG sensors. By applying human kinematics and dynamics theories, real-time joint angle and torque information was obtained and imported into OpenSim. This platform can simulate the real-time muscle force values produced by the upper limbs during movements. The myoelectric signals were first filtered to remove noise, and an exponential model was then used to obtain the muscle activation. These data were then entered into the Hill-type prediction model to determine an individual’s muscle forces. In this paper, grasping movements commonly used in everyday situations were taken as a testing case. The results of the experiments showed that an individual’s muscle forces can be predicted using a Hill-type model. The results are consistent with those from simulated muscle force models and can reflect the real forces experienced during upper limb exercises.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
World Health Organization. World health statistics 2018, Available online. http://www.who.org/
Perez R, Costa U, Torrent M, Solana J, Opisso E, Caceres C, Tormos JM, Medina J, Gomez EJ (2017) Upper limb portable motion analysis system based on inertial technology for neurorehabilitation purposes. Sensors 10:10733–10751
Rahman MH, Rahman MJ, Cristobal OL, Saad M, Kenné JP, Archambault PS (2015) Development of a whole arm wearable robotic exoskeleton for rehabilitation and to assist upper limb movements. Robotica 33:19–39
Albert CL, Peter DG, Lorie GR, Jodie KH, George FW, Daniel GF, Robert JR, Todd HW, Hermano IK, Bruce TV, Christopher TB, Dawn MB, Pamela WD, Barbara HC, Alysia DM, Stephen EN, Susan SC, Janet MP, Grant DH, Peter P (2010) Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. New England J Med 362:1772–1783
Farulla GA, Pianu D, Cempini M, Cortese M, Russo LO, Indaco M, Nerino R, Chimienti A, Oddo CM, Vitiello N (2016) Vision-based pose estimation for robot-mediated hand telerehabilitation. Sensors 16:208
Borboni A, Maddalena M, Rastegarpanah A, Saadat M, Aggogeri F (2016) Kinematic performance enhancement of wheelchair-mounted robotic arm by adding a linear drive. 2016 IEEE international symposium on medical measurements and applications (MeMeA)
Zhang L, Zheng Z, Li G, Sun Y, Jiang G, Kong J, Tao B, Xu S, Yu H, Liu H (2018) Tactile sensing and feedback in SEMG hand. Int J Comput Sci Math 9(4):365–376
Rzyman G, Szkopek J, Redlarski G, Palkowski A (2020) Upper limb bionic orthoses: general overview and forecasting changes. Appl Sci 10(15):5323
Meattini R, Chiaravalli D, Palli G, Melchiorri C (2020) sEMG-based human-in-the-loop control of elbow assistive robots for physical tasks and muscle strength training. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 5(4):5795–5802
Xu G, Song A, PanL, Li H, Liang Z, Zhu S, Xu B, Li J (2012) Adaptive hierarchical control for the muscle strength training of stroke survivors in robot-aided upper-limb rehabilitation. Int J Adv Robot Syst, https://doi.org/10.5772/51035
Hogan N, Krebs HI, Charnnarong J, Srikrishna P, Sharon A (1993) MIT-MANUS: a workstation for manual therapy and training II[P]. Other Conferences
Gassert R, Dietz V (2018) Rehabilitation robots for the treatment of sensorimotor deficits: a neurophysiological perspective. J NeuroEng Rehab, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-018-0383-x
Lenzi T, De Rossi SMM, Vitiello N, Carrozza MC (2012) Intention-based EMG control for powered exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Bio-Med Eng 59(8)
Shing LH, Quan XS (2011) Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects[J]. Med Eng Phys 34(3)
Hao L, Jun T, Pan L (2018) Human-robot cooperative control based on sEMG for the upper limb exoskeleton robot. Robot Auton Syst
He L, Xiong C, Liu K, Huang J, He C, Chen WB (2018) Mechatronic design of a synergetic upper limb exoskeletal robot and wrench-based assistive control. J Bionic Eng 15:247–259
Nelson CA, Nouaille L, Poisson G (2020) A redundant rehabilitation robot with a variable stiffness mechanism. Mech Mach Theory 150
Leiyu Z, Jianfeng L, Ying C, Mingjie D, Bin F, Pengfei Z (2020) Design and performance analysis of a parallel wrist rehabilitation robot (PWRR). Robot Auton Syst 125(C)
Nelson Carl A, Laurence N, Gérard P (2019) A redundant rehabilitation robot with a variable stiffness mechanism. Mechan Mach Theory 150
Ning Y, Xu W, Huang H, Li B, Liu F (2019) Design methodology of a novel variable stiffness actuator based on antagonistic-driven mechanism. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C: J Mech Eng Sci 233(19–20)
Meshram DA, Patil DD (2020) 5G Enabled tactile internet for tele-robotic surgery. Procedia Comput Sci 171
Platz T, Pinkowski C, Van WF, Wijck FV, Kim IH, Bella PD, Johnson G (2005) Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer test, action research arm test and box and block test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehab 19:404–411
Mehrholz J, Pohl M, Platz T, Kugler J, Elsner B (2018) Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd006876.pub5
Proud EL, Miller KJ, Bilney B, Balachandran S, McGinley JL, Morris ME (2015) Evaluation of measures of upper limb functioning and disability in people with Parkinson disease: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehab 96:540–551
Boser QA, Valevicius AM, Lavoie EB, Chapman CS, Pilarski PM, Hebert JS, Vette AH (2018) Cluster-based upper body marker models for three-dimensional kinematic analysis: comparison with an anatomical model and reliability analysis. J Biomech 72:228–234
Caimmi M, Guanziroli E, Malosio M, Pedrocchi N, Vicentini F, Molinari Tosatti L, Molteni F (2015) Normative data for an instrumental assessment of the upper-limb functionality. Biomed Res Int 484131
Hebert JS, Lewicke J, Williams TR, Vette AH (2014) Normative data for a modified box and blocks test measuring upper limb function via motion capture. J Rehab Res Dev 51:919–932
Sohn WJ, Sipahi R, Sanger TD, Sternad D (2019) Portable motion-analysis device for upper-limb research, assessment, and rehabilitation in non-laboratory settings. IEEE J Trans Eng Health Med 7:1–14
Vigotsky AD, Halperin I, Lehman GJ, Trajano GS, Vieira TM (2018) Interpreting signal amplitudes in surface electromyography studies in sport and rehabilitation sciences. Front Physiol 108:227–237
Goble JA, Zhang Y, Shimansky Y, Sharma S, Dounskaia NV (2007) Directional biases reveal utilization of arm’s biomechanical properties for optimization of motor behavior. J Neurophysiol 98:1240–1252
William HJ, Shivam P, Priyanshu A, Sadie HR, Bowie RL, Michael DB, Marcia KO’M (2018) Toward improved surgical training: Delivering smoothness feedback using haptic cues. 2018 IEEE haptics symposium (HAPTICS), pp 241–246
Zhang LL, Zhou J, Zhang XA, Wang CT (2011) Upper limb musculo-skeletal model for biomechanical investigation of elbow flexion movement. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Science) 16:61–64
Ma R, Zhang L, Li G, Jiang D, Xu S, Chen D (2020) Grasping force prediction based on sEMG signals. Alexandria Eng J 59(3):1135–1147
Dai C, Hu X (2019) Extracting and classifying spatial muscle activation patterns in forearm flexor muscles using high-density electromyogram recordings. Int J Neural Syst, https://doi.org/10.1142/s0129065718500259
Ursula T, Hermann S, Richard B, Nathalie A (2019) Muscle force estimation in clinical gait analysis using AnyBody and OpenSim. J Biomech 86:55–63
Malesevic N, Björkman A, Andersson GS, Matran-Fernandez A, Citi L, Cipriani C, Antfolk C (2020) A database of multi-channel intramuscular electromyogram signals during isometric hand muscles contractions. Scientific Data, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0335-8
Delp SL, Anderson FC, Arnold AS, Loan P, Habib A, John CT, Guendelman E, Thelen DG (2007) OpenSim: open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 54(11):1940–1950
Saul KR, Hu X, Goehler CM, Vidt ME, Daly M, Velisar A, Murray WM (2015) Benchmarking of dynamic simulation predictions in two software platforms using an upper limb musculoskeletal model. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 18:1–14
David GL, Thor FB (2003) An EMG-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. J Biomech 36:765–776
Christian F, Günter H (2008) A human–exoskeleton interface utilizing electromyography. IEEE Trans Rob 24:872–882
Jiateng H, Yingfei S, Lixin S, Bingyu P, Zhipei H, Jiankang W, Zhiqiang Z (2018) A pilot study of individual muscle force prediction during elbow flexion and extension in the neurorehabilitation field. Sensors 16:2–15
Acknowledgements
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51865056), and Xi’an Jiaotong University State Key Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems Engineering (Grant No. sklms2018006).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tao, Q., Li, Z., Lai, Q., Wang, S., Liu, L., Kang, J. (2021). A Dynamic Evaluation Mechanism of Human Upper Limb Muscle Forces. In: Pham, T.D., Yan, H., Ashraf, M.W., Sjöberg, F. (eds) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Computation, and Data Science. Computational Biology, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69951-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69951-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69950-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69951-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)