Skip to main content

Abstract

Sustainable Development Goal Sixteen (SDG16) is about peace, justice and institutional accountability. Among the 17 sustainable development goals, the SDG16 is recognised as the bedrock upon which the successes of the remaining goals lie. This is because for any country or organisation to reach higher heights, the fundamental principles of maintaining peace, attaining justice for all and ensuring institutional accountability must be realised. It is a representation of a ‘transformative shift’ from the Millennium Development Goals and highlights the roles that peace, justice and good institutions play in development. It further enhances the collective achievement of the global vision 2030, hence its relevance to the study. However, the rise of the fake news phenomenon is seen as a potential barrier to the attainment of the SDG16 in Ghana. Unauthentic news that mimics real news with the intent to cause havoc and chaos has the potency to affect the peace and stability of every nation. The situation in Africa, especially Ghana, with regard to the dissemination of fake news is quite alarming owing to the fact that individuals and institutions, including the media, the most trusted source of information, are not endowed with the capacity and systems to deal with fake new.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, M. N., Emrizal, R., Razman, M. R., Ramli, Z., & Arifin, K. (2017). Understanding Aggressive Behaviour to Avoid Damages Through the Precautionary Principle Towards the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 15(1), 52–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aufderheide, P. (1993). Media Literacy: A Report of the National Leadership Conference on Media Literacy. Aspen, CO: Aspen Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bajo, C. (2019). Fake News and Censorship in Africa. CCCBLAB. Retrieved May 7, 2019, from http://lab.cccb.org/en/fake-news-and-censorship-in-africa/

  • Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive Integration and the Reinvention of Political Journalism. Political Communication, 22(3), 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (2007). An Introduction to Content Analysis. In: Berg, B.L., Ed., Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 238–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D., & Schwartz, A. (2016). Miley, CNN and the Onion. Journalism Practice, 10(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Josr, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion Shapes the Diffusion of Moralized Content in Social Networks. PNAS, 114(28), 7313–7318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., & Morreale, M. (2013). The Impact of Real News about “Fake News”: Inter-textual Processes and Political Satire. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 323–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. N., Conroy, N. J., & Rubin, V. L. (2015). Misleading Online Content: Recognizing Clickbait as ‘False News’. Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on Workshop on Multimodal Deception Detection. Seattle, WA: ACM

    Google Scholar 

  • Costera, I. (2007). The Paradox of Popularity. How Young People Experience the News. Journalism Studies, 8(1), 96–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Vicario, M., Quattrociocchi, W. A., & Zollo, F. (2018). Polarization and Fake News: Early Warning of Potential Misinformation Targets. ArXiv New Media, 1(1), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagin, J., & Metzger, J. (2007). The Role of Site Features, User Attributes, and Information Verification Behaviors on the Perceived Credibility of Web-based Information. New Media & Society, 9(2), 319–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018). Measuring the Reach of “Fake News” and Online Disinformation in Europe. Factsheets Reuters Institutehttps://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/2018-02/Measuring%20the%20reach%20of%20fake%20news%20and%20online%20distribution%20in%20Europe%20CORRECT%20FLAG.pdf [accessed 26/05/2021]

  • Flynn, D. J., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2017). The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs about Politics. Political Psychology, 38, 127–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J., & Taddy, M. (2016). Measuring Polarization in High-Dimensional Data: Method and Application to Congressional Speech (No. Id: 11114).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gyamera, B. A. R. B. A. R. A. (2018). Electoral Violence and Democracy in Africa: The Case of Ghana (1992–2012). Doctoral dissertation, University of Ghana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. Z. & Marquardt, M. (2018). Cognitive Ability and Vulnerability to Fake News. Scientific American. Retrieved May 8, 2019, from https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cognitive-ability-and-vulnerability-to-fake-news/

  • Hunt, A., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireton, C., & Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, Fake News and Disinformation. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, T. L. (2016). Amartya Sen’s Capabilities Approach and Communication for Development and Social Change. Journal of Communication, 66(5), 789–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, G., & Shearer, E. (2016). News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. Washington: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S., Cho, H., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Media Literacy Interventions: A Meta-Analytic Review. Journal of Communication, 62, 454–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalsnes, B. (2018). Fake News. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamerer, D. (2013). Media Literacy. Communication Research Trends, 32, 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempe Ronald Hope Sr. (2019). Peace, justice and inclusive institutions: overcoming challenges to the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 16, Global Change, Peace & Security, 32:1, 57–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/14781158.2019.1667320

  • Khairil, M., Emrizal, R., Rizal, M., Ramli, Z., & Arifin, K. (2017). Understanding Terrorism Based on Radicalism Idea in Order to Avoid Instability for Achieving Environmental Peace and Justice the Sustainable Development Goals. Journal of Food, Agriculture & Environment, 15(1), 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohut, A., Morin, R., & Keeter, S. (2007, April 15). What Americans Know: 1989–2007, Public Knowledge of Current Affairs Little Changed by News and Information Revolutions. PEW Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasnova, H., Veltri, N. F., Eling, N., & Buxmann, P. (2017). Why Men and Women Continue to Use Social Networking Sites: The Role of Gender Differences. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 26(4), 261–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuenzi, M., & Lambright, G. (2015). Campaign Appeals in Nigeria’s 2007 Gubernatorial Elections. Democratization, 22(1), 134–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., et al. (2018). The Science of Fake News. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, N. M. (2018). Fake News, Phishing, and Fraud: A Call for Research on Digital Media Literacy Education Beyond the Classroom. Communication Education, 67(4), 460–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning from Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, P. (2006). What Are Cognitive Abilities and Skills and How to Boost Them. Sharp Brains. Retrieved May 9, 2019, from https://sharpbrains.com/blog/2006/12/18/what-are-cognitive-abilities/

  • Moraga-González, J. & Vaiva, P. (2013). Search Costs, Demand-Side Economies and the Incentives to Merge under Bertrand Competition. CEPR Discussion Papers 9374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. S. (2009). The Daily Show with Jon Stewart and Audience Attitude Change During the 2004 Party Conventions. Political Behavior, 31(1), 79–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J. L., & Taneja, H. (2018). The small, Disloyal Fake News Audience: The Role of Audience Availability in Fake News Consumption. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3720–3737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. R., & Park, J. (2015). Publicity as Covert Marketing? The Role of Persuasion Knowledge and Ethical Perceptions on Beliefs and Credibility in a Video News Release Story. Journal of Business Ethics, 130(2), 327–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D. A. L., & Nielsen, R. K. (2017). Reuters Institute Digital News Report 2017. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R. K., & Graves, L. (2017). News You Don’t Believe: Audience Perspectives on Fake News. Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordway, D. (2017). Fake News and the Spread of Misinformation. Cambridge: Kennedy School on Media, Politics and Public Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma, B. (2017). Did Target’s Stock ‘Crash’ Due to Its Transgender Bathroom Policy? Retrieved May 7, 2019, from https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fwww.snopes.com%2Ftargets-stock-transgender-bathroom-policy%2F

  • Patel, F. (2020). Glocal Development for Sustainable Social Change. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change (pp. 501–517). Springer, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2018). Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning. Cognition, 6(11), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penplusbytes (2018). Media perspectives on fake news in Ghana, May 2, 2018, https://penplusbytes.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/FAKE-NEWS-STUDY.pdf [accessed 26/05/2021]

  • Popken, B. (2019). Age, Not Politics, Is Biggest Predictor of Who Shares Fake News on Facebook, Study Finds. NBC News. Retrieved May 7, 2019, from https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/age-not-politics-predicts-who-shares-fake-news-facebook-study-n957246

  • Reuters. (2017). A Brief Guide to Standards, Photoshop and Captions. Handbook of Journalism. Toronto: Reuters News Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes J (Ed.). (2007). Communication for Development. Making a Difference—A WCCD Background Study. World Congress on Communication for Development: Lessons, Challenges and the Way Forward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servaes, J. (2020). Terms and Definitions in Communication for Development and Social Change. In Handbook of Communication for Development and Social Change (pp. 3–13). Springer, Singapore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, K., Sliva, A., Wang, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2017). Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 19(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tambini, D. (2017). Fake News: Public Policy Responses. Media Policy Brief 20. London: Media Policy Project, London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandoc Jr., E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A Typology of Scholarly Definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, P. N. (2020). Communication for Social Change, Making Theory Count. Nordicom Review, 36(s1), 71–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2013). Global Sustainable Development Report – Executive Summary: Building the Common Future We Want. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development. 2013, http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/globalsdreport/ [accessed 26/05/2021]

  • Vos, T. P., Craft, S., & Ashley, S. (2012). New Media, Old Criticism: Bloggers’ Press Criticism and the Journalistic Field. Journalism: Theory, Practice & Criticism, 13(7), 850–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xenos, M. A., & Becker, A. B. (2009). Moments of Zen: Effects of the Daily Show on Information Seeking and Political Learning. Political Communication, 26(3), 317–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, C., Gupta, A., Kauten, C., Deokar, A. V., & Qin, X. (2019). Detecting fake news for reducing misinformation risks using analytics approaches. European Journal of Operational Research 279, 1036–1052.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zubiaga, A., & Ji, H. (2014). Tweet, But Verify: Epistemic Study of Information Verification on Twitter. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 4(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kobby Mensah .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mensah, K., Awini, G., Mensah, G.K. (2021). Fake News and SDG16: The Situation in Ghana. In: Yusha’u, M.J., Servaes, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of International Communication and Sustainable Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69770-9_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics