Abstract
In this paper, I discuss the idea that the university should provide a training of the mind that is not reducible to techniques for the efficacious screening and shifting of information. That does not mean that the latter is unnecessary or undesirable. To the contrary, given how bombarded we are with information from morning to night in the digital age, it is clearly beneficial, essential even, that we learn how to manage it all, and to navigate treacherous waters with skill. Nonetheless, there is a risk that we devote so much effort to developing methods and protocols for preparatory and prophylactic information management that we lose sight of the question of why we read, study, teach, and learn. There is especially a risk that a reorientation in how we read and study ultimately implies a transmutation of why we read, the aim and function of reading and studying themselves. As our proficiency in scanning and skimming becomes second nature, it can come to supplant our hard-won aptitude for careful analysis, concentration, reflection, and self-correction. In short, we should not take our capacity for focused attention for granted. In an era of perpetual distraction, the question of what is required for paying attention is an urgent one for higher education.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Robert Louden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006); Max Scheler, The Human Place in the Cosmos, övers. Manfred S. Frings (Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 2008); see also Martin Buber, “The Philosophical Anthropology of Max Scheler,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 1945, pp. 307–321; Martin Buber, The Knowledge of Man: A Philosophy of the Interhuman (New York: Harper & Row, 1965); Ernst Cassirer, An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1944); and Paul Ricoeur, Philosophical Anthropology, Johann Michel and Jérôme Porée (eds.), trans. David Pellauer (Cambridge: Polity, 2016)
- 2.
I’m thinking here of Plato’s Phaedrus, the Sophist, the Statesman and the Philebus, but also the Laws and the Timaeus.
- 3.
See especially “Insight and Reflection,” T. L. Saaty & F. J. Weyl (eds.), The Spirit and Uses of the Mathematical Sciences (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1955), pp. 281–301.
- 4.
We can thank especially Hans-Georg Gadamer (Truth and Method) and Hannah Arendt (Life of the Mind) for calling attention to the practical consequences of Kant’s idea of judgment, elucidated in his third critique.
- 5.
Kant, Critique of Judgement, p. §40, p. 137, ftnte. 32
- 6.
Parts of the discussion of Ortega are, in slightly altered form, borrowed from S. Rider, “Truth, Democracy and the Mission of the University,” in The Thinking University: A Philosophical Examination of Thought and Higher Education , Ron Barnett & Søren S.E. Bengtsen (eds) (Springer, 2018)
References
Arendt, H. (1981). The life of the mind. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Buber, M. (1945). The philosophical anthropology of Max Scheler. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 6(2), 307–321.
Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman. New York: Harper & Row.
Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.
Kant, I. (1951). Critique of Judgement (J.H. Bernard, Trans.) New York: Hafner Publishing.
Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (R. Louden, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ortega y Gasset, J. (1946). Mission of the University. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner.
Piper, A. (2012). Book was there. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (2016). Philosophical anthropology: Writings and lectures (D. Pellauer, Trans.) (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Polity.
Rider, S. (2018). Truth, democracy and the mission of the university. In R. Barnett & S. S. E. Bengtsen (Eds.), The thinking university: A philosophical examination of thought and higher education. Cham: Springer.
Scheler, M. (2008). The human place in the cosmos (M. S. Frings, Trans.) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Turkle, S. (2015). How to teach in an age of distraction, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 October 2015.
Weil, S. (1952). The need for roots. Prelude to a declaration of duties toward mankind (A. Wills, Trans.). New York: Routledge.
Weyl, H. (1955). Insight and reflection. In T. L. Saaty & F. J. Weyl (Eds.), The spirit and uses of the mathematical sciences (pp. 281–301). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Trans.). New York: Basil Blackwell.
Wolf, M. (2018). Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound, The Guardian, August 25 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rider, S. (2021). Higher Education: Learning How to Pay Attention. In: Bengtsen, S.S.E., Robinson, S., Shumar, W. (eds) The University Becoming. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69628-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69628-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69627-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69628-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)