Skip to main content

Higher Education: Learning How to Pay Attention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The University Becoming

Part of the book series: Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives ((DHEP,volume 6))

  • 1034 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, I discuss the idea that the university should provide a training of the mind that is not reducible to techniques for the efficacious screening and shifting of information. That does not mean that the latter is unnecessary or undesirable. To the contrary, given how bombarded we are with information from morning to night in the digital age, it is clearly beneficial, essential even, that we learn how to manage it all, and to navigate treacherous waters with skill. Nonetheless, there is a risk that we devote so much effort to developing methods and protocols for preparatory and prophylactic information management that we lose sight of the question of why we read, study, teach, and learn. There is especially a risk that a reorientation in how we read and study ultimately implies a transmutation of why we read, the aim and function of reading and studying themselves. As our proficiency in scanning and skimming becomes second nature, it can come to supplant our hard-won aptitude for careful analysis, concentration, reflection, and self-correction. In short, we should not take our capacity for focused attention for granted. In an era of perpetual distraction, the question of what is required for paying attention is an urgent one for higher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Immanuel Kant, Anthropology from a Pragmatic Point of View, trans. Robert Louden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2006); Max Scheler, The Human Place in the Cosmos, övers. Manfred S. Frings (Evanston, Ill: Northwestern University Press, 2008); see also Martin Buber, “The Philosophical Anthropology of Max Scheler,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 6, no. 2, 1945, pp. 307–321; Martin Buber, The Knowledge of Man: A Philosophy of the Interhuman (New York: Harper & Row, 1965); Ernst Cassirer, An Essay on Man: An Introduction to a Philosophy of Human Culture (Yale University Press, New Haven, 1944); and Paul Ricoeur, Philosophical Anthropology, Johann Michel and Jérôme Porée (eds.), trans. David Pellauer (Cambridge: Polity, 2016)

  2. 2.

    I’m thinking here of Plato’s Phaedrus, the Sophist, the Statesman and the Philebus, but also the Laws and the Timaeus.

  3. 3.

    See especially “Insight and Reflection,” T. L. Saaty & F. J. Weyl (eds.), The Spirit and Uses of the Mathematical Sciences (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1955), pp. 281–301.

  4. 4.

    We can thank especially Hans-Georg Gadamer (Truth and Method) and Hannah Arendt (Life of the Mind) for calling attention to the practical consequences of Kant’s idea of judgment, elucidated in his third critique.

  5. 5.

    Kant, Critique of Judgement, p. §40, p. 137, ftnte. 32

  6. 6.

    Parts of the discussion of Ortega are, in slightly altered form, borrowed from S. Rider, “Truth, Democracy and the Mission of the University,” in The Thinking University: A Philosophical Examination of Thought and Higher Education , Ron Barnett & Søren S.E. Bengtsen (eds) (Springer, 2018)

References

  • Arendt, H. (1981). The life of the mind. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1945). The philosophical anthropology of Max Scheler. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 6(2), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buber, M. (1965). The knowledge of man: A philosophy of the interhuman. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. (1944). An essay on man: An introduction to a philosophy of human culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1989). Truth and method. London: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1951). Critique of Judgement (J.H. Bernard, Trans.) New York: Hafner Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (2006). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (R. Louden, Trans.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega y Gasset, J. (1946). Mission of the University. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trubner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piper, A. (2012). Book was there. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ricoeur, P. (2016). Philosophical anthropology: Writings and lectures (D. Pellauer, Trans.) (Vol. 3). Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rider, S. (2018). Truth, democracy and the mission of the university. In R. Barnett & S. S. E. Bengtsen (Eds.), The thinking university: A philosophical examination of thought and higher education. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. (2008). The human place in the cosmos (M. S. Frings, Trans.) Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (2015). How to teach in an age of distraction, The Chronicle of Higher Education, 2 October 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weil, S. (1952). The need for roots. Prelude to a declaration of duties toward mankind (A. Wills, Trans.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1955). Insight and reflection. In T. L. Saaty & F. J. Weyl (Eds.), The spirit and uses of the mathematical sciences (pp. 281–301). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). On certainty. (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Trans.). New York: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2018). Skim reading is the new normal. The effect on society is profound, The Guardian, August 25 2018.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Rider .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rider, S. (2021). Higher Education: Learning How to Pay Attention. In: Bengtsen, S.S.E., Robinson, S., Shumar, W. (eds) The University Becoming. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69628-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69628-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69627-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69628-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics