Skip to main content

First-Price Auctions: Extensions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Auction Theory

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

  • 1070 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter applies the analysis of equilibrium bidding behavior in first-price auctions from Chap. 2 to answer different questions. In Exercise 3.1, we measure the seller’s expected revenue in this auction format when bidders draw their valuations from a generic distribution function and then evaluate this expected revenue in the case that bidders’ valuations are uniformly distributed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Recall the integration by parts formula: \(\int uv^{\prime }=uv-\int u^{\prime }v\). Let u = x and v  = G α(x), then u  = 1 and \(v=G_{\alpha }(x)=x^{\frac {N-1}{\alpha }}\).

  2. 2.

    Recall that we apply backward induction to find the subgame perfect equilibrium (or equilibria) of a sequential-move game. When applying backward induction, we start with the last stage of the game, finding optimal actions for the player(s) called to move in this stage. Then, we move to the second-to-last mover who, anticipating equilibrium behavior in the last stage, chooses his optimal action. We can repeat this process by moving one step closer to the first stage of the game, successively finding equilibrium behavior of each stage. For more details on this solution concept, see the Game Theory Appendix at the end of the book, and for more examples, see Munoz-Garcia and Toro-Gonzalez (2020, Chapter 4).

  3. 3.

    The above expression considers that bidders submitting bids \(b_{i}\left ( v_{i}\right ) \geq r\) participate in the auction, while those with valuations leading to low bids \(b_{i}\left ( v_{i}\right ) <r\) do not. In addition, it considers that the participating bidder with the lowest valuation submits a bid \(b_{i}\left ( r\right ) =r\) where his valuation is v i = r. To see this point, note that he must be indifferent between participating and not participating in the auction, so his expected utility must satisfy F(v i)N−1(v i − b i) = 0. Substituting b i = r, we obtain F(v i)N−1(v i − r) = 0, which holds only if v i = r, i.e., if his valuation coincides with the reservation price. Therefore, the participation condition using bids, \(b_{i}\left ( v_{i}\right ) \geq r\), implies an analogous condition using valuations, which we can write as v i ≥ r, explaining that the lower bound of integration is v i = r in the above expressions.

  4. 4.

    We need this condition to ensure a one-to-one mapping between the entry fee and the critical bidder’s valuation. The monotonically increasing bidding function b i(v i) ensures that bidders with valuations above v e obtain a positive utility from participating in the auction (after paying the entry fee E) and thus submit a positive bid for the object.

References

  • Che, Y. K., & Gale, I. (1998). Standard auctions with financially constrained bidders. The Review of Economic Studies, 65(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, K., & Porter, R. H. (1989). Collusion in auctions. Annales d’Êonomie et de Statistique, 15/16, 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, V. (2009). Auction theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee, R., & McMillan, J. (1992). Bidding rings. American Economic Review, 82(3), 579–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Garcia, F. (2017). Advanced microeconomic theory: An intuitive approach with examples. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munoz-Garcia, F., & Toro-Gonzalez, D. (2020). Strategy and game theory, practice exercises with answer keys (2nd ed.). Springer-Nature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, M. S. (1985). Collusion and the choice of auction. RAND Journal of Economics, 16(1), 141–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Choi, PS., Munoz-Garcia, F. (2021). First-Price Auctions: Extensions. In: Auction Theory. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69575-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics