Skip to main content

Exoskeleton Controller and Design Considerations: Effect on Training Response for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Wearable Robotics: Challenges and Trends (WeRob 2020)

Part of the book series: Biosystems & Biorobotics ((BIOSYSROB,volume 27))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1503 Accesses

Abstract

The objective of this research was to identify variables (demographic, device, neurological, clinical, and training session dose) that were associated with results of the ten-minute walk test (10MWT) for individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) who participated in a large randomized crossover clinical trial of exoskeletal walking. Fifty individuals were randomized into Group AB or BA (A = exoskeleton intervention arm, B = control arm). A generalized linear mixed model was applied to model 10MWT and found that a training dose of 36 sessions and gender were the most significant. These variables were more significant than neurological level of injury or completeness of injury. Understanding the effects of exoskeleton/human interface for different devices is crucial for identifying suitable candidates to use the device and developing effective/efficient clinical training protocols for community ambulation, rehabilitation, and recovery post-SCI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.R. Koller et al., Comparing neural control and mechanically intrinsic control of powered ankle exoskeletons. IEEE Int. Conf. Rehab. Robot. 2017, 294–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ramanujam, et.al., Neuromechanical adaptations during a robotic powered exoskeleton assisted walking session. J. Spinal Cord Méd. 41(5), 518–528 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.F. Forrest et al., in Muscle Changes After Exoskeleton Training. ISCOS, (Dublin, Ireland, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. Hong et‘al., Results from a three center randomized clinical trial. Front. Robot. AI 7(93) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowlegements

Research supported by Department of Defense/CDMRP SC130234 Award: W81XWH-14-2-0170.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gail F. Forrest .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Forrest, G.F. et al. (2022). Exoskeleton Controller and Design Considerations: Effect on Training Response for Persons with Spinal Cord Injury. In: Moreno, J.C., Masood, J., Schneider, U., Maufroy, C., Pons, J.L. (eds) Wearable Robotics: Challenges and Trends. WeRob 2020. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69547-7_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69547-7_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69546-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69547-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics