Skip to main content

Due Process of Law in Criminal Cases: Evolution of Requirements (Historical-Legal and Comparative Law Research)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap (ISC 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 198))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 51 Accesses

Abstract

The paper is concerned with the evolution of the concept of due process of law of resolution of criminal cases. This concept was for the first time enshrined in due form in the Great Charter of 1215; however, even before this, humankind aimed at officially approving, and then formalizing, the procedure of dispute resolution by elders, which in after years became special dicasts or appointed arbitrators. The author keeps track of the evolution of this concept and its filling with new content in the countries of Anglo-Saxon and civil law and its universal recognition after the Second World War in the form of fundamental documents of the United Nations and various regional documents. In addition, the author analyzes the meaning of this concept in a modern age, when in many cases it is necessary to choose not to comply with due process of law for reasons of economic expediency, substituting it with fast-track procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Giacinto Della Cananea, Due Process of Law Beyond the State: Requirements of Administrative Procedure, Oxford University Press, 2016, p. 23.

  2. 2.

    For more details, see: Paltseva, L.A. judicial proceedings in Greece in VII-VI centuries B.C. // Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. 2011., Series 2, Issue 1. p. 17.

  3. 3.

    Ibid, p. 19.

  4. 4.

    Ukolova, V.I. Roman law // Nemirovskiy, A.I., Il’inskaya, L.S., Ukolova, V.I.. Antiquity: history and culture. M., 1994. pp. 174–189.

  5. 5.

    Wilbur R. Miller, ed. The Social History of Crime and Punishment in America: an Encyclopedia. SAGE Publications Inc., 2012.

  6. 6.

    Coke E. First Part of Institutes of Laws of England; or, A Commentary upon Littleton / E. Coke. — Philadelphia: Robert H. Small, 1853. — Vol. I, Pt. 1. — 162 b.

  7. 7.

    Ryan Williams, Substantive Due Process in Historical Context. [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2012/02/10/ryan-williams/substantive-due-process-historical-context (accessed: 06.06.2020).

  8. 8.

    Lee Bridges, “The Right to Representation and Legal Aid” in Mike McConville and Geoffrey Wilson (eds) The Handbook of the Criminal Justice Process (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).

  9. 9.

    Will Kenton, Due Process Defined [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/d/due-process.asp (accessed: 06.06.2020).

  10. 10.

    Ryan Williams, Substantive Due Process in Historical Context. [Electronic resource] URL: https://www.cato-unbound.org/2012/02/10/ryan-williams/substantive-due-process-historical-context (accessed: 06.06.2020).

  11. 11.

    A reading-book on the monuments of the feudal state and the law of the countries of Europe. M., 1961.

  12. 12.

    Ordonnance Criminelle // Recueil général des anciennes lois françaises, depuis l’an 420 jusqu’à la Révolution de 1789 / Éd. F.-A. Isambert et al. Vol. 18. 1830.

  13. 13.

    A reading-book on the history of the State and law of Russia. M.: Prospekt Publishing House, 2005, pp. 15–16, 25.

  14. 14.

    See The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective. By Mauro Cappelletti. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1989. Xxiv + 417 pp. See also James Willard Hurst The Functions of Courts in the United States, 1950-1980. Madison: Disputes Processing Research Program, University of Wisconsin, 1980, the study of changes in the functions of courts in the period from 1950 till 1980 in the United States, when “social state” was formed at first, and then started to decay.

  15. 15.

    Victor V. Ramraj, Four Models of Due Process. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law. I.Con, vol. 2, No. 3, 2004, p. 493.

  16. 16.

    The Right to Due Process [Electronic resource] (accessed: 07.06.2020).

  17. 17.

    This goal, for example, was directly set within the framework of the research program “Structural analysis of administration of justice” of the German Federal Ministry of Justice. See Zusammenstellung bei van Raden/Strempel, Strukturanalyse der Rechtspflege, Sonderdruck des Bundesanzeigers, WIBERA, 1991: 7ff.

  18. 18.

    See R. E. Scott and W. J. Stuntz, ‘Plea Bargaining as Contract,’ 101 Yale L. 1. 1909 (1992), 24.

  19. 19.

    Richard A. Posner. Economic Analysis of Law. St. Petersburg. 2004. p. 754.

  20. 20.

    Herbert L. Packer. Two Models of the Criminal Process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review Vol. 113, No. 1 (Nov., 1964), pp. 1–68.

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Regina Rauxloh, “Plea Bargaining in National and International Law”, Routlege, Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York (2012).

  23. 23.

    Darryl K. Brown. THE PERVERSE EFFECTS OF EFFICIENCY IN CRIMINAL PROCESS. Virginia Law Review, [Vol. 100, 2014] p. 183.

References

  1. Stephanos, B.: The Machinery of Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, D.K.: The perverse effects of efficiency in criminal process. Virginia Law Rev. 100, (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cappelletti, M.: The Judicial Process in Comparative Perspective, pp. xxiv + 417. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coke, E, Small, R.H.: First Part of Institutes of Laws of England or A Commentary upon Littleton, vol. 1, pp. 1–162 (1853)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Giacinto, D.C.: Due Process of Law Beyond the State: Requirements of Administrative Procedure. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hurst, J.W.: The Functions of Courts in the United States, 1950-1980. Madison: Disputes Processing Research Program, University of Wisconsin (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zander, M.: Plea Bargaining Goes Back a Hundred Years. New Law J. 148 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zusammenstellung bei van Raden/Strempel, Strukturanalyse der Rechtspflege, Sonderdruck des Bundesanzeigers, p. 7ff. WIBERA (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Scott, R.E., Stuntz, W.J.: Plea bargaining as contract. Yale Law J. 101(8), 1909 (1992). https://doi.org/10.2307/796952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anthology of the Heritage of Feudal State and Law of the European Countries. State Publishing House of Legal Literature (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Titov, Y.P., Velby, M.: Anthology of the History of State and Law in Russia, 2nd edn. Prospect Publishing House, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Elkin, A.: The Indigenous Population of Australia. Trans. from English (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stepanov, A.A.: Magna Carta. Its History and Promulgation. History and Archives (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ukolova, V.I.: Roman law. In: Nemirovsky, A.I., Ilyinskaya, L.S., Ukolova, V.I. (eds.) Antiquity: history and culture. pp. 174–189 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vorontsov, N.N., Sukhorukova, L.N.: Evolution of the organic world (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ryan, W.: Substantive Due Process in Historical Context. [Electronic resource] https://www.cato-unbound.org/2012/02/10/ryan-williams/substantive-due-process-historical-context, Accessed 06 June 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evgenii V. Korchago .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Korchago, E.V. (2021). Due Process of Law in Criminal Cases: Evolution of Requirements (Historical-Legal and Comparative Law Research). In: Popkova, E.G., Sergi, B.S. (eds) Modern Global Economic System: Evolutional Development vs. Revolutionary Leap. ISC 2019. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 198. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69415-9_195

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics