Skip to main content

Modeling Talent Shortage for Entrepreneurship Among Student with Government Policy Support as Mediating Effect: SEM Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries (ICBT 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 194))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this study, it tests the government factor as a mediator to see the significant impact of the relationship between talent demand and talent supply towards talent shortage. As currently, the rise of a talent shortage among student as an entrepreneur in acute condition. The nation right now faced increment number unemployment among young graduate. Government has proposed young graduate to be entrepreneurship to beat this issue—however, the entrepreneurial skills among young graduate far below expectation. Do government do not adequately provide enough support for the entrepreneur ecosystem among young graduate to growth as an entrepreneur. Hence this paper, focusing on developing a significant model to beat talent shortage with the perspective of demand and supply. Then, 371 respondents among public universities student by using simple random sampling. Data analysed with IBM-SPSS and IBM-AMOS to develop a model through path analysed. It was found that the government factor provides a significant factor as a mediator and both talent demand and positively significant towards talent shortage. All hypotheses positively supported. This paper significantly impacts to the government, higher education institution, entrepreneur, and student itself with finding presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Aasheim, C.L., et al.: Knowledge and skill requirements for entry-level information technology workers: a comparison of industry and academia. J. Inf. Syst. Educ. 20(3), 10 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Afthanorhan, A., et al.: Moderated mediation using covariance-based structural equation modeling with amos graphic: volunteerism program. Adv. Nat. Appl. Sci. 8(8), 108–116 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Afthanorhan, W., et al.: Testing the mediation effect using covariance based structural equation modeling with AMOS. Am. Int. J. Res. Humanit. Arts Soc. Sci. 6(2), 186–190 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Afthanorhan, W., Ahmad, S.: Modelling a high reliability and validity by using confirmatory factor analysis on five latent construct: volunteerism program. Int. Res. J. Adv. Eng. Sci. Technol. IRJAEST 1(1), 7 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Afthanorhan, W., Ahmad, S.: Path analysis in covariance-based structural equation modeling with Amos 18.0. Eur. J. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2(10) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ahmad, N.H., et al.: The ecosystem of entrepreneurial university: the case of higher education in a developing country. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 78(1–2), 52–69 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Anderson, J.C., Gerbing, D.W.: Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol. Bull. 103(3), 411 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arora, N., Dhole, V.: Generation Y. Benchmarking Int. J. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Awang, Z.: SEM Made Simple: A Gentle Approach to Learning Structural Equation Modeling. MPWS Rich Publication (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Awang, Z.: Structural equation modeling using AMOS graphic. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi MARA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Axelrod, E.L., et al.: War for talent, part two. McKinsey Q. 2, 9 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aziz, M., et al.: The influence of employer value proposition in talent demand towards talent shortage in the Malaysian Islamic banking institutions: a SEM approach. Manag. Sci. Lett. 9(6), 843–850 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aziz, M.I., et al.: An empirical investigation into Malay workers’ intentions to leave their jobs. Int. J. Innov. 7(10), 19 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Aziz, M.I., et al.: Talent development model for a career in Islamic banking institutions: a SEM approach. Cogent Bus. Manag. 3(1), 1186259 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Azman, N., et al.: Managing and mobilising talent in Malaysia: issues, challenges and policy implications for Malaysian universities. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 38(3), 316–332 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Azman, N., et al.: Promoting university–industry collaboration in Malaysia: stakeholders’ perspectives on expectations and impediments. J. High. Educ. Policy Manag. 41(1), 86–103 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Beechler, S., Woodward, I.C.: The global “war for talent”. J. Int. Manag. 15(3), 273–285 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bertoni, F., et al.: The impact of government-supported participative loans on the growth of entrepreneurial ventures. Res. Policy 48(1), 371–384 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bindu, P.H.: Engaging the diverse workforce–an empirical study of generation X and Y. Int. J. Res. Econ. Soc. Sci. IJRESS. 7, 4 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bova, B., Kroth, M.: Workplace learning and Generation X. J. Workplace Learn. (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Brenčič, V., Pahor, M.: Exporting, demand for skills and skill mismatch: evidence from employers’ hiring practices. World Econ. 42(6), 1740–1773 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Brown, P., Tannock, S.: Education, meritocracy and the global war for talent. J. Educ. Policy 24(4), 377–392 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Burguet, R., Sákovics, J.: Bidding for input in oligopoly. Edinb. Sch. Econ. Discuss. Pap. 266 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cappelli, P.: Talent management for the twenty-first century. Harv. Bus. Rev. 86(3), 74 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cappelli, P.: Your approach to hiring is all wrong. Harv. Bus. Rev. 97(3), 48–58 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Caspin-Wagner, K., et al.: The changing structure of talent for innovation: on demand online marketplaces. In: International Business in the Information and Digital Age, pp. 245–272 Emerald Publishing Limited (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cavallo, A., Ghezzi, A., Balocco, R.: Entrepreneurial ecosystem research: present debates and future directions. Int. Entrepreneursh. Manage. J. 15(4), 1291–1321 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Chambers, E.G., et al.: The war for talent. McKinsey Q. 44–57 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Collings, D.G., et al.: Global talent management and performance in multinational enterprises: a multilevel perspective. J. Manag. 45(2), 540–566 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Comunian, R., England, L.: Creative clusters and the evolution of knowledge and skills: from industrial to creative glassmaking. Geoforum 99, 238–247 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cunningham, W.A., et al.: Implicit attitude measures: consistency, stability, and convergent validity. Psychol. Sci. 12(2), 163–170 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Darling-Hammond, L., Sykes, G.: Wanted, a national teacher supply policy for education: the right way to meet the “highly qualified teacher” challenge. Educ. Policy Anal. Arch. 11, 33 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A.: Shortage of sustainable supply chain talent: an industrial training framework. Ind. Commer. Train. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A.: Supply chain talent: the missing link in supply chain strategy. Ind. Commer. Train. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Eisner, S.P.: Managing generation Y. SAM Adv. Manag. J. 70(4), 4 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Elrick, T., Lewandowska, E.: Matching and making labour demand and supply: agents in Polish migrant networks of domestic elderly care in Germany and Italy. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 34(5), 717–734 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hair Jr., J.F., et al.: Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) an emerging tool in business research. Eur. Bus. Rev. 26(2), 106–121 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fort, R., Winfree, J.: Sports really are different: the contest success function and the supply of talent. Rev. Ind. Organ. 34(1), 69–80 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gallardo-Gallardo, E., et al.: Talent Management: Context Matters. Taylor & Francis (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Gerbing, D.W., Anderson, J.C.: An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J. Mark. Res. 186–192 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Glas, Z.E., et al.: Effect of monetary incentives on mail survey response rates for midwestern farmers. Soc. Nat. Resour. 32(2), 229–237 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Grönlund, A.: More control, less conflict? Job demand–control, gender and work–family conflict. Gend. Work Organ. 14(5), 476–497 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Guvenen, F., et al.: Multidimensional skill mismatch. Am. Econ. J. Macroecon. 12(1), 210-44 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Haggstrom, G.W.: Assessing teacher supply and demand. ERIC (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Hair, J., et al.: An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 117(3), 442–458 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hair, J.F., et al.: AMOS covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM): guidelines on its application as a marketing research tool (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Hair, J.F.: Research methods for business (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hee, O.C., Rhung, L.X.: Motivation and employee retention among millennials in Malaysia. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 9, 2 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hewlett, S.A., et al.: The Hidden Brain Drain: Off-Ramps and On-Ramps in Women’s Careers. Harvard Business School Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hooper, D., et al.: Evaluating model fit: a synthesis of the structural equation modelling literature. In: 7th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies, pp. 195–200 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Hughes, J.C., Rog, E.: Talent management: a strategy for improving employee recruitment, retention and engagement within hospitality organizations. Int. J. Contemp. Hosp. Manag. 20(7), 743–757 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Ingrassia, R.: Labor market imbalances and personnel recruitment. Am. J. Ind. Bus. Manag. 9(06), 1376 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Irshad, M.: Talent production in the face of retirement of baby boomers in developed countries. Abasyn J. Soc. Sci. 9(1), 141 (2016)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  54. Jeffrey, S.: The benefits of tangible non-monetary incentives. University of Chicago, Graduate School of Business (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Kammeyer-Mueller, J., Liao, H.: Workforce reduction and job-seeker attraction: examining job seekers’ reactions to firm workforce-reduction policies. Hum. Resour. Manag. Publ. Coop. Sch. Bus. Adm. Univ. Mich. Alliance Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag. 45(4), 585–603 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Lee, W., Kim, B.: Business sustainability of start-ups based on government support: an empirical study of Korean start-ups. Sustainability. 11(18), 4851 (2019)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Litman, B.R.: The television networks, competition and program diversity. J. Broadcast. Electron. Media. 23(4), 393–409 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Liu, R., et al.: An optimized decision-making algorithm for talent supply. J. Interdiscip. Math. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Loon, M., Casimir, G.: Job-demand for learning and job-related learning. J. Manag. Psychol. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Michaels, E., et al.: The War for Talent. Harvard Business Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  61. O’Bannon, G.: Managing our future: the generation X factor. Public Pers. Manag. 30(1), 95–110 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Oyer, P.: Salary or benefits? Res. Labor Econ. 28(2008), 429–467 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Podgursky, M.J.: Fringe benefits: there is more to compensation than a teacher’s salary. Econ. Publ. MU (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Rahman, M.S., et al.: Generation “X” and “Y” knowledge sharing behaviour: the influence of motivation and intention on non-academic staff of higher learning institutions. J. Appl. Res. High. Educ. 9(2), 325–342 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-05-2016-0039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Rosli, M.M., Sidek, S.: The impact of innovation on the performance of small and medium manufacturing enterprises: evidence from Malaysia. J. Innov. Manag. Small Medium Enterp. 2013, 1 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Schildberg-Hörisch, H., Wagner, V.: Monetary and non-monetary incentives for educational attainment: design and effectiveness. In: The Economics of Education, pp. 249–268 Elsevier (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schouteten, R., Benders, J.: Lean production assessed by Karasek’s job demand–job control model. Econ. Ind. Democr. 25(3), 347–373 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Schweyer, A.: Talent Management Systems: Best Practices in Technology Solutions for Recruitment. Retention and Workforce Planning. Wiley, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Sekaran, U., Bougie, R.: Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. Wiley, Hoboken (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Shulus, A.A., et al.: Intellectual production and consumption: a new reality of the 21 st century. In: Institute of Scientific Communications Conference, pp. 353–359. Springer (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Somaya, D., Williamson, I.O.: Rethinking the ‘war for talent’. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 49(4), 29–34 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Spiro, C.: Generation Y in the Workplace. Def. ATl. 35(6), 16–19 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Stephan, M., et al.: A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: the global sourcing of science and engineering talent. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 22(3), 35–54 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Trost, A.: Talent Relationship Management: Competitive Recruiting Strategies in Times of Talent Shortage. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  75. Vaghefi, N., et al.: Impact of climate change on food security in Malaysia: economic and policy adjustments for rice industry. J. Integr. Environ. Sci. 13(1), 19–35 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Wójcik, P.: Shortage of talents–a challenge for modern organizations. Int. J. Synergy Res. 6, 123 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Ye, S., Hu, S.: Research on the training mode of market-oriented targeted accounting talents. In: 2019 International Conference on Management, Education Technology and Economics (ICMETE 2019). Atlantis Press (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Yusliza, M.Y., et al.: A structural model of the impact of green intellectual capital on sustainable performance. J. Clean. Prod. 249, 119334 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Ikhwan Aziz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aziz, M.I., Hassan, H., Uthamaputran, S., Merican, R., Rahim, M. (2021). Modeling Talent Shortage for Entrepreneurship Among Student with Government Policy Support as Mediating Effect: SEM Approach. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A., Elgedawy, I. (eds) The Importance of New Technologies and Entrepreneurship in Business Development: In The Context of Economic Diversity in Developing Countries. ICBT 2020. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 194. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_145

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69221-6_145

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69220-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69221-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics