Abstract
The biodiversity in an agroecosystem has a wide range of roles to play.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Becker CD, Ghimire K (2003) Synergy between traditional ecological knowledge and conservation science supports forest preservation in Ecuador. Glob Ecol Conserv 8(1):1
Becker CD, Leon R (2000) Indigenous institutions and forest condition: lessons from the Yuracare. McKean GM, Ostrom E (eds) People and forests: communities, institutions, and the governance. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA 163–191
Berkes F (1999) Role and significance of ‘tradition’ in indigenous knowledge: Focus on traditional ecological knowledge. Indigenous Knowledge and Development Monitor, Netherlands
Berkes F (2004) Rethinking community‐based conservation. Conserv Biol 18(3):621–30
Berkes F, Jolly D (2002) Adapting to climate change: social-ecological resilience in a Canadian western Arctic community. Ecol Conserv 5(2)
Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10(5):1251–62
Boafo YA, Saito O, Kato S, Kamiyama C, Takeuchi K, Nakahara M (2016) The role of traditional ecological knowledge in ecosystem services management: the case of four rural communities in Northern Ghana. Int J Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Serv Manag 12:24–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2015.1124454
Curtis JT (1959) The vegetation of Wisconsin: an ordination of plant communities. University of Wisconsin Press
Gadgil M, Berkes F (1991) Traditional resources management systems. Resour Manag Optim 8(3–4):127–141
Kershaw KA (1973) Quantitative and dynamic plant-ecology, 3rd edn. ELBS and Edward Arnold Ltd., London
Mehta JP, Tiwari SC, Bhandari BS (1997) Phytosociology of woody vegetation under different management regimes in Garhwal Himalaya. J Trop For Sci 10:24–34
Naidoo R, Hill K (2006) Emergence of indigenous vegetation classifications through integration of traditional ecological knowledge and remote sensing analyses. Environ Manage 38(3):377–387
Nalina CN, Anilkumar KS, Shilpashree KG, Babu N, Sudhir K, Natarajan A (2017) Inventory and mapping of land resources for land use planning through detail soil survey coupled with remote sensing and GIS Techniques: a case study in Nagenahalli watershed, Doddaballapur taluk, Bengaluru rural district, India. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci 6(8):314–331
Nautiyal S, Bhaskar K, Khan YI (2015) Biodiversity of semiarid landscape: baseline study for understanding the impact of human development on ecosystems. Springer, Berlin
Pandey DN (2002) Traditional knowledge systems for biodiversity conservation. Organization of the United Nations (FAO) Forestry Paper. FAO Rome Italy 22–41
Phillips EA (1959) Methods of vegetation study
Pilgrim SE, Cullen L, Smith D, Pretty J (2007) Hidden harvest or hidden revenue? The effect of economic development pressures on local resource use in a remote region of southeast Sulawesi, Indonesia. Indian J Tradit Knowl 6:150–159
Ramakrishnan PS (2005) Mountain biodiversity, land use dynamics and traditional ecological knowledge. In: Huber UM, Bugmann HKM, Reasoner MA (eds) Global change and mountain regions. Adv Glob Chang Res 23 (Springer, Dordrecht)
Saxena AK, Singh JS (1982) A phytosociological analysis of wood species in forest communities of a part of Kumaun Himalaya. Vegetation 50:3–22
Swamy RN (2017) Protection of traditional knowledge in the present IPR regime: a mirage or a reality. Indian J Public Adm 60(1):35–60
Warren DM (1996) Indigenous knowledge, biodiversity conservation and development. Sustainable development in third world countries. Appl Theor Perspect 81–88
Warren DM, Rajasekaran B (1993) Putting local knowledge to good use. J Agric Environ Int Dev 13(4):8–10
Zent S, Maffi L (2009) Final REPORT on Indicator No. 2: methodology for developing a vitality index of traditional environmental knowledge (VITEK) for the project ‘Global Indicators of the Status and Trends of Linguistic Diversity and Traditional Knowledge, Terralingua
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nautiyal, S., Goswami, M., Shivakumar, P. (2021). Structure and Functions of FMV in Rural–Urban Interface. In: Field Margin Vegetation and Socio-Ecological Environment. Environmental Science and Engineering(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69201-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69201-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69200-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69201-8
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)