Skip to main content

Additional Considerations When Responding to a Nuclear Attack

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism

Abstract

Conventional explosions—even huge explosions such as the 2020 blast in Beirut (Rigby et al. in Shock Waves 30:671–675, 2020 [7])—pale in comparison to the magnitude of a nuclear explosion. In fact, the relatively primitive and low-yield bomb used to attack Hiroshima was larger than the ten largest man-made non-nuclear explosions combined. Or to look at the matter another way, while a large number of people have a huge amount of personal experience responding to attacks using chemical explosives, there are few—if any—people alive with comparable experience in responding to nuclear attacks. Because of this it seems reasonable to devote some attention to factors that make a nuclear attack so much more devastating than attacks using chemical explosives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bruddemeier B, Dillon M (2009) Key response planning factors for the aftermath of nuclear terrorism, LLNL-TR-410067. LLNL

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dillon M (2014) Determining optimal fallout shelter times following a nuclear detonation. Proc. Royal Soc A 470:20130693. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2013.0693. Accessed 24 Nov 2020

  3. Dupont D (2004) Nuclear explosions in orbit. Sci Am 290(6):100–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Glasstone S, Dolan P (1977) The effects of nuclear weapons, 3rd edn. Government Printing Office, Washington DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Harding R (2018) Fukushima nuclear disaster: did the evacuation raise the death toll? Financial Times March 10. https://www.ft.com/content/000f864e-22ba-11e8-add1-0e8958b189ea. Accessed 24 Nov 2020

  6. International Atomic Energy Agency (2003) Method for developing arrangements for response to a nuclear or radiological emergency. IAEA, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rigby S, Lodge T, Alotaibi S, Barr A, Clarke S, Langdon G, Tyas A (2020) Preliminary yield estimation of the 2020 Beirut explosion using video footage from social media. Shock Waves 30:671–675

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. US Department of Homeland Security (2016) Quick reference guide: radiation risk information for responders following a nuclear detonation. US DHS, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Andrew Karam .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Karam, P.A. (2021). Additional Considerations When Responding to a Nuclear Attack. In: Radiological and Nuclear Terrorism. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69162-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics