Abstract
The smartphone use is increasing at an unprecedented pace all around the world. Researchers try to reveal its influence on people, particularly the students. The present qualitative research study aims to enlighten smartphone influence on architecture students in Design Studio I (DS I) in an educational perspective. One hundred and thirty-three architecture students coming from different nations attended the present study. The students were in their second semester of architecture department. They answered two open-ended questions. Data is analyzed through content analysis. Except for few applications variation in nationality did not manifest to a significant difference. Students’ smartphone use reasons emerged in eight categories, while their self-critics emerged in three categories, and finally recommendations for efficient use of the smartphone in six. Students use the smartphone both for academic and non-academic reasons. Students’ success of assignments in the studio I course depends on both academic and nonacademic smartphone uses. Students use the smartphones frequently and would like to use more often. Students would like to use their smartphones to access on-point information, easily, and rapidly without putting in much effort. Students urged actions from their teachers and department managers accordingly, but criticize their use as well. The students may not be aware of the critical targets of DS I. Students need guidance and motivation while using smartphones for DS I to fulfill targets. Recommendations for smartphone use were presented.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barks A, Searight HR, Ratwik S (2011) Effects of text messaging on academic performance. J Pedagogy Psychol 4(1):4–9
Boumoslesh J, Jaalouk D (2018) Smartphone addiction among university students and its relationship with academic performance. Global J Health Sci 10(1):48–59
Brazley MD (2014) How do students learn with mobile technology. US-China Education Review a 4(6):357–371
Campbell-Kelly M, Garcia-Swartz D, Lam R, Yang Y (2015) Economic and business perspectives on smartphones as multi-sides platforms. Telecommunication Policiy 39:717–734
Casañ-Pitarch R (2018) Smartphone serious games as a motivating resourse in the LSP calssroom. J Foreign Lang Educ Technol 3(2):52–72
Cecere G, Corrocher N, Battaglia RD (2015) Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design? Telecommun Policiy 39:162–175
Cochrane T, Rhodes D (2011) iArchi[tech]ture: heutagogical approaches to education facilitated by mlearning integration. Education and technology: innovation and research. Proceedings of ICICTE. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235633454_iArchitechture_Heutagogical_Approaches_to_Education_Facilitated_by_Mlearning_Integration
Cole A, Napier T, Marcum B (2015) Generation Z: Fact and fictions. In: Napier T (ed) Not just where to click: teaching students how to think about information. American Library Association, Chicago, IL, pp 107–137
Creswell JW (2003) Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks
Derounian JG (2017) Mobiles in class? Active Learn High Educ 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417745214
Düzenli T, Alpak EM, Çiğdem A, Tarakçı Eren E (2018) The effect of studios on learning in design education. J Hist Cult Art Res 7(2):191–204. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v7i2.1392
Fadzidah A, Mohd Hisyamuddin Bin K, Aliyah Nur Zafirah S (2017) Go virtual: exploring augmented reality application in representation of steel architectural construction for the enhancement of architecture education. Adv Sci Lett 23(2):804–808
Felisoni DD, Godoi AS (2018) Cell phone usage and academic performance: an experiment. Comput Educ 117:175–187
Goldschmidt G, Hochman H, Dafni I (2010) The design studio “crit”: teacher student communication. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 24(3):285–302
Güler K (2015) Social media-based learning in the design studio: a comparative study. Comput Educ 87:192–203
Harpur P (2017) Mobile lecturers, mobile students: an exploratory study in a blended architectural technology context. J Enterprise Inf Manag 30(5):748–778
Hawi NZ, Samaha M (2016) To excel or not Excel: strong evidence on the adverse effect of smartphone addiction on academic performance. Comput Educ 98:81–89
Hill GA (2017) The “tutorless” design studio: a radical experiment in blended learning. J Probl Based Learn High Educ 5(1):111–125
Hoskova S, Mokra T (2010) Alexithymia among students of different disciplines. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 9:33–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.111
Jackson LD (2013) Is mobile technology in the classroom a helpful tool or distraction? A report of university students’ attitudes, usage practices, and suggestions for policies. Int J Technol Knowl Soc 8:130–140
Jain D, Chakraborty P, Chakraverty S (2018) Smartphone apps for teaching engineering courses: experience and scope. J Educ Technol Syst 1–13
Kuznekoff JH, Titsworth S (2013) The impact of mobile phone usage on student learning. Commun Educ 62(3):233–252
Mohammad Abu Taleb BR, Coughlin C, Romanowski MH, Semmar Y, Hosny K (2017) Students, mobile devices and classrooms: a comparison of US and Arab undergraduate students in a Middle Eastern University. High Educ Stud 7(3):181–195
Mohd Suki N, Mohd Suki N (2011) Using mobile device for learning: from students’ perspective. US-China Educ Rev A 1:44–53
Odom D (2016) Teaching with smartphones in the higher education classroom. J Youth Ministry 14(2):6–15
Oh Y, Ishizaki S, Gross MD, Yi-Luen Do E (2013) A theoretical framework of design critiquing in architecture studios. Des Stud 34(3):302–325
Pektaş ŞT (2015) The virtual design studio on the cloud: a blended and distributed approach for technology-mediated design education. Archit Sci Rev 58(3):255–265
Redondo E, Fonseca D, Sánchez A, Navarro I (2012) Augmented reality in architecture degree: new approaches in scene illumination and user evaluation. J Inf Technol Appl Educ 1(1):19–27
Savery CA (2015) Student mobile devices in class: distruptive or manageable? Int J Humanit Soc Sci Rev 1(1):1–5
Schnabel MA, Ham JJ (2012) Virtual design studio within a blended social network. J Inf Technol Constr 17(Special Issue):397–415
Shaheen A, Cohen A, Martin E (2017) Smarthone app evolution and early understanding from a multimodel app user survey. In: Meyer G, Shaheen S (eds) Distrupting mobility, lecture notes in mobility. Cham: Springer, pp. 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51602-8_10
Svatonova H, Hoskova-Mayerova S (2017) Social aspects of teaching: subjective preconditions and objective evaluation of ınterpretation of ımage data. In: Hoskova-Mayerova S, Maturo F, Kacprzyk J (eds) Mathematical-statistical models and qualitative theories for economic and social sciences. Studies in systems, decision and control, vol 104. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54819-7_13
Tindell DR, Bohlander RW (2012) The use and abuse of cell phones and text messaging in the classroom: a survey of college students. Coll Teach 60(1):1–9
Withell A, Cochrane T, Reay S, Gaziulusoy I, Inder S (2012) Augmenting the design thinking studio. In: Brown M (ed) Ascilite 2012: future challenges, sustainable futures. Wellington, New Zealand: Ascilite, pp 1071–1081. Retrieved from https://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/handle/10292/5018
Yu F (A.). (n. d.) Mobile/smart phone use in higher education, pp 831–839. https://swdsi.org/swdsi2012/proceedings_2012/papers/Papers/PA144.pdf
Zhang KZK, Chen C, Lee MKO (2014) Understanding the role of motives in smartphone addiction. PACIS 2014 Proceedings. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/31b0/d1154aa8e11bbcd98fd25fc2f296fdda831e.pdf?_ga=2.39746208.2072551977.1566140252-698949350.1566140252
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Akçay, A.Ö., Baysen, F., Çakmak, N. (2021). Architecture Students’ Smartphone Use in Design Studio I. In: Soitu, D., Hošková-Mayerová, Š., Maturo, F. (eds) Decisions and Trends in Social Systems. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 189. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69094-6_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69094-6_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-69093-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-69094-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)