Skip to main content

From Preferences of Social Groups to Planning and Management Solutions of Green Spaces in Bucharest

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning (INPUT 2021)

Abstract

The critical role of green in cities is widely considered to have positive implications for health and for providing a complete set of ecosystem services in cities. Highly linked to the concept of ecosystem services is the role of accessibility to those ecosystems and places providing the services. However, a gap often exists between the presence of existing greenspaces and the demands and preferences for accessibility of different social groups (e.g., children and elderly people). This work evaluates the preferences of social groups regarding green spaces in the light of the important role that green and blue spaces play in Bucharest. The users’ preferences have been assessed through the administration of a questionnaire survey to evaluate the level of park accessibility and to investigate the factors that influence the preferences of the social groups visiting the green spaces. The results obtained from an analysis of the responses provided are then interpreted to define planning scenarios aimed at increasing existing features of the green and blue spaces, or including additional features, according to the requests/preferences/issues raised by the users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Badiu DL, Onose DA, Niță MR, Lafortezza R (2019) From “red” to green? A look into the evolution of green spaces in a post-socialist city. Landscape Urban Plann 187:156–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel S, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Nowak DJ, Kronenberg J, de Groot R (2015) Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ioja C, Patroescu M, Nita M, Rozylowicz L, Vanau G, Ioja A, Onose D (2010) Categories of residential spaces by their accessibility to urban parks—indicator of sustainability in human settlements. Case study: bucharest. WSEAS transactions on environment and development 6. WSEAS transactions on environment and development 5, pp 307–314

    Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D (2014) Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Ind 42:122–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Rosa D, Takatori C, Shimizu H, Privitera R (2018) A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustain Cities Soc 36:346–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perini K, Sabbion P (2017) Urban sustainability and river: green and blue infrastructure. Jonh Wiley and Sons Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB (2010) Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape Urban Plann 95:130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vierikko K, Niemelä J (2016) Bottom-up thinking—identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue—green infrastructure planning in Helsinkim, Finland. Land Use Policy 50:537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniele La Rosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sipala, M., La Rosa, D. (2021). From Preferences of Social Groups to Planning and Management Solutions of Green Spaces in Bucharest. In: La Rosa, D., Privitera, R. (eds) Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. INPUT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68823-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68824-0

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics