Abstract
The critical role of green in cities is widely considered to have positive implications for health and for providing a complete set of ecosystem services in cities. Highly linked to the concept of ecosystem services is the role of accessibility to those ecosystems and places providing the services. However, a gap often exists between the presence of existing greenspaces and the demands and preferences for accessibility of different social groups (e.g., children and elderly people). This work evaluates the preferences of social groups regarding green spaces in the light of the important role that green and blue spaces play in Bucharest. The users’ preferences have been assessed through the administration of a questionnaire survey to evaluate the level of park accessibility and to investigate the factors that influence the preferences of the social groups visiting the green spaces. The results obtained from an analysis of the responses provided are then interpreted to define planning scenarios aimed at increasing existing features of the green and blue spaces, or including additional features, according to the requests/preferences/issues raised by the users.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Badiu DL, Onose DA, Niță MR, Lafortezza R (2019) From “red” to green? A look into the evolution of green spaces in a post-socialist city. Landscape Urban Plann 187:156–164
Elmqvist T, Setälä H, Handel S, van der Ploeg S, Aronson J, Blignaut J, Gómez-Baggethun E, Nowak DJ, Kronenberg J, de Groot R (2015) Benefits of restoring ecosystem services in urban areas. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14:101–108
Gómez-Baggethun E, Barton DN (2013) Classifying and valuing ecosystem services for urban planning. Ecol Econ 86:235–245
Ioja C, Patroescu M, Nita M, Rozylowicz L, Vanau G, Ioja A, Onose D (2010) Categories of residential spaces by their accessibility to urban parks—indicator of sustainability in human settlements. Case study: bucharest. WSEAS transactions on environment and development 6. WSEAS transactions on environment and development 5, pp 307–314
La Rosa D (2014) Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Ind 42:122–134
La Rosa D, Takatori C, Shimizu H, Privitera R (2018) A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustain Cities Soc 36:346–362
Perini K, Sabbion P (2017) Urban sustainability and river: green and blue infrastructure. Jonh Wiley and Sons Ltd
Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter UK, Toftager M, Bentsen P, Kamper-Jørgensen F, Randrup TB (2010) Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landscape Urban Plann 95:130–137
Vierikko K, Niemelä J (2016) Bottom-up thinking—identifying socio-cultural values of ecosystem services in local blue—green infrastructure planning in Helsinkim, Finland. Land Use Policy 50:537–547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sipala, M., La Rosa, D. (2021). From Preferences of Social Groups to Planning and Management Solutions of Green Spaces in Bucharest. In: La Rosa, D., Privitera, R. (eds) Innovation in Urban and Regional Planning. INPUT 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 146. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68824-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68823-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68824-0
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)