Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sharing Identity Information on Dark Web Drug Boards

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Trends and Challenges in Information Science and Information Seeking Behaviour

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 193))

  • 306 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter uses Elfreda Chatman’s concept of small worlds and Reijo Savolainen’s concept of Way of Life to examine identity information sharing on a Finnish Dark Web drug trading image board. Based on a curated set of posts, it shows how people’s identity information sharing on such anonymous fora often centres around issues of trust and safety. The chapter discovers that like other small world virtual communities, these too are of information poor environments, where some participants are seen as outsiders and some as insiders, based on factors such as age, ethnicity, and information sharing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gehl RW (2018) Weaving the dark web: legitimacy on Freenet, Tor, and I2P. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Moore D, Rid T (2016) Cryptopolitik and the darknet. Survival 58(1):7–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Barratt MJ (2012) Silk road: Ebay for drugs. Addiction 107(3):683–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Norbutas L (2018) Offline constraints in online drug marketplaces: an exploratory analysis of a cryptomarket trade network. Int J Drug Policy 56:92–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bilgrei OR (2018) Broscience. Creating trust in online drug communities. New Media Soc 20(8):2712–2727

    Google Scholar 

  6. Demant J, Bakken SA, Oksanen A, Gunnlaugsson H (2019) Drug dealing on Facebook, Snapchat and Instagram: a qualitative analysis of novel drug markets in the Nordic countries. Drug Alcohol Rev 38(4):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Oksanen A, Miller BL, Savolainen I, Sirola A, Demant JJ, Kaakinen M, Zych I (2020) Illicit drug purchases via social media among American Young People. In: Social computing and social media, vol 12194. Springer, New York, pp 278–288

    Google Scholar 

  8. Martin J, Munksgaard R, Coomber R, Demant J, Barratt MJ (2020) Selling drugs on darkweb cryptomarkets: differentiated pathways, risks and rewards. Br J Criminol 60(3):559–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hämäläinen L (2015) User names of illegal drug vendors on a darknet cryptomarket. Onoma 50:43–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Buxton J, Bingham T (2015) The rise and challenge of dark net drug markets. Policy Brief 7:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moyle L, Childs A, Coomber R, Barratt MJ (2019) #Drugsforsale: an exploration of the use of social media and encrypted messaging apps to supply and access drugs. Int J Drug Policy 63:101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harviainen JT, Haasio A, Hämäläinen L (2020) Drug traders on a local Dark Web marketplace. In: AcademicMindtrek ‘20: proceedings of the 23rd international conference on academic mindtrek January 2020. ACM, New York, pp 20–26

    Google Scholar 

  13. Haasio A, Harviainen JT, Savolainen R (2020) Information needs of drug users on a local dark Web marketplace. Inf Process Manage 57(2)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nurmi J (2019) Understanding the usage of anonymous onion services, vol 62. Tampere University, Tampere

    Google Scholar 

  15. Foley S, Karlsen JR, Putniņš TJ (2019) Sex, drugs, and bitcoin: how much illegal activity is financed through cryptocurrencies? Rev Finan Stud 32(5):1798–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Grimani A, Gavine A, Moncur W (2020) An evidence synthesis of strategies, enablers and barriers for keeping secrets online regarding the procurement and supply of illicit drugs. Int J Drug Policy 75

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aldridge J, Askew R (2017) Delivery dilemmas: how drug cryptomarket users identify and seek to reduce their risk of detection by law enforcement. Int J Drug Policy 41:101–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D (2014) Not an ’eBay for drugs’: the cryptomarket “Silk road” as a paradigm shifting criminal innovation

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nurmi J, Kaskela T, Perälä J, Oksanen A (2017) Seller’s reputation and capacity on the illicit drug markets: 11-month study on the Finnish version of the Silk Road. Drug Alcohol Depend 178:201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lorenzo-Dus N, Di Cristofaro M (2018) I know this whole market is based on the trust you put in me and I don’t take that lightly. Trust, community and discourse in crypto-drug markets. Discourse Commun 12(6):608–626

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bakken SA, Demant JJ (2019) Sellers’ risk perceptions in public and private social media drug markets. Int J Drug Policy 73

    Google Scholar 

  22. Scourfield A, Flick C, Ross J, Wood DM, Thurtle N, Stellmach D, Dargan PI (2019) Synthetic cannabinoid availability on darknet drug markets—changes during 2016–2017. Toxicol Commun 3(1):7–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Duxbury SW, Haynie DL (2018) The network structure of opioid distribution on a darknet cryptomarket. J Quant Criminol 34:921–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Childs A, Coomber R, Bull M, Barratt MJ (2020) Evolving and diversifying selling practices on drug cryptomarkets: an exploration of off-platform “Direct Dealing.” J Drug Issues 50(2):173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Haasio A (2019) What is disnormative information? Inf Commun Sci Res 23(1):9–16

    Google Scholar 

  26. Burnett S, Lloyd A (2020) Hidden and forbidden: conceptualising dark knowledge. J Documentation, ahead-of-print

    Google Scholar 

  27. Becker HS (1963) Outsiders: studies in the sociology of deviance. MacMillan

    Google Scholar 

  28. Savolainen R (1995) Everyday life information seeking: approaching information seeking in the context of way of life. Libr Inf Sci Res 17(3):259–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Savolainen R (2008) Everyday information practices. A social phenomenological perspective. Scarecrow Press, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chatman EA (1996) The impoverished life-world of outsiders. J Am Soc Inf Sci 47(3):193–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chatman EA (1999) A theory of life in the round. J Am Soc Inf Sci 50(3):207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bourdieu P (1979) La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement. Editions de Minuit, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bourdieu P (1990) The logic of practice. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sonnenwald D (2006) Challenges in sharing information effectively: examples from command and control. Inf Res Int Electron J 11

    Google Scholar 

  35. Christin N (2013) Traveling the silk road: a measurement analysis of a large anonymous online marketplace. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on world wide web. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, pp 213–224

    Google Scholar 

  36. Martin J, Christin N (2016) Ethics in cryptomarket research. Int J Drug Policy 35:84–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ferguson R-H (2017) Offline ‘stranger’ and online lurker: methods for an ethnography of illicit transactions on the darknet. Qualit Res 17(6):683–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kaufmann M, Tzanetakis M (2020) Doing internet research with hard-to-reach communities: methodological reflections on gaining meaningful access. Qual Res

    Google Scholar 

  39. Dolliver DS (2015) Evaluating drug trafficking on the Tor Network: Silk road 2, the sequel. Int J Drug Policy 26(11):1113–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D (2015) A response to Dolliver’s ‘evaluating drug trafficking on the Tor network: Silk Road 2, the Sequel. Int J Drug Policy 26:1124–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Buskirk J, Roxburgh A, Naicker S, Burns L (2015) A response to Dolliver’s ‘evaluating drug trafficking on the Tor Network.’ Int J Drug Policy 26:1126–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Munksgaard R, Demant J, Branwen G (2016) A replication and methodological critique of the study ‘evaluating drug trafficking on the Tor network.’ Int J Drug Policy 35:92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Dolliver DS (2015) A rejoinder to authors: data collection on Tor. Int J Drug Policy 26:1128–1129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Hakalahti M (2019) Identiteettiin liittyvän tiedon jakaminen ja tiedontarpeet tor-verkon Sipulitorilla. MA thesis, Tampere University

    Google Scholar 

  45. Chatman EA (1991) Life in a small world. Applicability of gratification theory to information-seeking behavior. J Am Soc Inf Sci 42(6):438–449

    Google Scholar 

  46. Burnett G, Besant M, Chatman EA (2001) Small worlds: normative behavior in virtual communities and feminist bookselling. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 52(7):536–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Festinger L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by Academy of Finland grant 329342-5, Extremist Networks, Narcotics and Criminality in Online Darknet Environments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Finnish Academy of Science and Letters, Helsinki, Finland

    Maria Hakalahti

  2. Tampere University, Tampere, Finland

    J. Tuomas Harviainen

Authors
  1. Maria Hakalahti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Tuomas Harviainen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Tuomas Harviainen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication Sciences, Faculty of Letters, and Doctoral School in Communication Sciences, Faculty of Journalism and Communication Studies, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Octavia-Luciana Madge

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hakalahti, M., Harviainen, J.T. (2021). Sharing Identity Information on Dark Web Drug Boards. In: Madge, OL. (eds) New Trends and Challenges in Information Science and Information Seeking Behaviour. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 193. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68466-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation