Skip to main content

Heuristic Evaluation of COVID-19 Chatbots

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Chatbot Research and Design (CONVERSATIONS 2020)

Abstract

Chatbots have been adopted in the health domain and their number grew during the current COVID-19 pandemic. As a new kind of interface, chatbots combine visual elements with natural conversation. While conversational capabilities of chatbots improve, little attention has been given to the evaluation of the user experience and chatbot usability. This paper presents the results of a heuristic review of 24 COVID-19 chatbots on different channels (webchat vs messengers), for diverse topics (symptom-checker vs FAQ) and with varying interaction styles (visual-centric vs content-centric vs conversation-centric). It proposes a generic evaluation framework with 12 heuristics based on Nielsen’s ten heuristics and adapted to the conversational interface context. The results point at the strengths (immediate feedback, familiar language, consistent wording and visual design) as well as shortcomings (little user control and freedom, missing permanent menu and help options, lack of context understanding and interaction management capabilities) of COVID-19 chatbots. The paper furthermore gives recommendations for chatbot design in similar contexts.

Supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR), SLANT, 13320890.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://researcher.watson.ibm.com/researcher/view_group.php?id=7539.

References

  1. Bongard-Blanchy, K., Bouchard, C.: Dimensions of user experience-from the product design perspective (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Why people use chatbots. In: Kompatsiaris, I., et al. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 377–392. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandtzaeg, P.B., Følstad, A.: Chatbots: changing user needs and motivations. Interactions 25(5), 38–43 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3236669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Budiu, R.: The user experience of chatbots. Nielsen Norman Group (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaix, B., Delamon, G., Guillemasse, A., Brouard, B., Bibault, J.E.: Psychological distress during the Covid-19 pandemic in France: a national assessment of at-risk populations. medRxiv (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Danilava, S., Busemann, S., Schommer, C., Ziegler, G.: Towards computational models for a long-term interaction with an artificial conversational companion. In: Proceeding of ICAART’2013 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fadhil, A., Schiavo, G.: Designing for health chatbots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.09022 (2019)

  8. Artificial Companion for Second Language Conversation. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15504-9_14

  9. Holmes, S., Moorhead, A., Bond, R., Zheng, H., Coates, V., McTear, M.: Usability testing of a healthcare chatbot: can we use conventional methods to assess conversational user interfaces? In: Proceedings of ECCE, pp. 207–214 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hone, K.S., Graham, R.: Towards a tool for the subjective assessment of speech system interfaces (sassi). Nat. Lang. Eng. 6, 287–303 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lallemand, C., Gronier, G.: Méthodes de design UX: 30 méthodes fondamentales pour concevoir des expériences optimales. Eyrolles (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Luger, E., Sellen, A.: Like having a really bad PA: the gulf between user expectation and experience of conversational agents. In: Proceedings CHI’2016, pp. 5286–5297. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858288

  13. McTear, M., Callejas, Z., Griol, D.: The Conversational Interface: Talking to Smart Devices. Springer (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Moore, R.J., Arar, R.: Conversational UX Design: A Practitioner’s Guide to the Natural Conversation Framework. ACM Books (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. MTI-Singapore: Ministry of trade and industry Singapore, MTI Chat for Biz (2020). https://www.mti.gov.sg/Chatbot/chat

  16. Munsch, N., et al.: A benchmark of online COVID-19 symptom checkers. medRxiv (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nielsen, J.: Ten usability heuristics (2005). http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ten-usability-heuristics/. Accessed 25 Jun 2020

  18. Semigran, H.L., Linder, J.A., Gidengil, C., Mehrotra, A.: Evaluation of symptom checkers for self diagnosis and triage: audit study. bmj 351, h3480 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shariat, J., Saucier, C.S.: Tragic Design: The Impact of Bad Product Design and How to Fix It. O’Reilly, United States (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shevat, A.: Designing Bots: Creating Conversational Experiences. O’Reilly, United States (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sugisaki, K., Bleiker, A.: Usability guidelines and evaluation criteria for conversational user interfaces: a heuristic and linguistic approach. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Mensch und Computer, pp. 309–319 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. TARS: Chatbot templates to fight coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic, June 2020. https://hellotars.com/chatbot-templates/coronavirus-covid19-fight/

  23. Verma, V.: 10 usability heuristics every chatbot company should follow. UX Collective, Medium (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vijayakumar, B., Höhn, S., Schommer, C.: Quizbot: exploring formative feedback with conversational interfaces. In: Draaijer, S., Joosten-ten Brinke, D., Ras, E. (eds.) TEA 2018. CCIS, vol. 1014, pp. 102–120. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25264-9_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Walker, M.A., Litman, D.J., Kamm, C.A., Abella, A.: Evaluating spoken dialogue agents with PARADISE: two case studies. Comp. Speech Lang. 12(4), 317–348 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sviatlana Höhn .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Höhn, S., Bongard-Blanchy, K. (2021). Heuristic Evaluation of COVID-19 Chatbots. In: Følstad, A., et al. Chatbot Research and Design. CONVERSATIONS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12604. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68288-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68288-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68287-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68288-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics