Abstract
The pressure on faculty has continued to escalate to produce, that is to bring money into the university. The Bayh-Dole Act came with a requirement to submit any novel idea as a patent application. While not enforceable as a regulation, this guidance to professors, along with funding opportunities from companies, state seed funding for companies and small business categories of federal funding have pressured faculty to think like entrepreneurs. However, the culture of the university has not adapted. The administration is still reaping the benefits of tax-exempt status, near-immunity from lawsuits, while maintaining an illusory Ivory Tower status. To keep the best of both worlds, university administrators have insulated themselves from the problem of research ethics. They do what they are required to, but many cases are dismissed without an inquiry. Can the majority of cases really be frivolous allegations? There is no doubt that the pressures to seek funding are taking a toll on faculty and affecting the ethical climate. Universities have focused on productivity above all else and since the federal regulations have put them in charge of adjudication, there is a brewing crisis.
It takes a thousand men to invent a telegraph, or a steam engine, or a phonograph, or a photograph, or a telephone or any other important thing – and the last man gets the credit and we forget the others. He added his little mite – that is all he did. These object lessons should teach us that ninety-nine parts of all things that proceed from the intellect are plagiarisms, pure and simple; and the lesson ought to make us modest. But nothing can do that.
– Mark Twain, Letter to Helen Keller, 1903
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hohm, C.F., and H.B. Shore. 1998. The Academy Under Siege: Informing the Public About the Merits of Academic Tenure. Sociological Perspectives 41: 827–831.
Sobel, D. 1995. Longitude: The True Story of a Lone Genius Whole Solved the Greatest Scientific Problem of his Time. New York: MacMillian.
Kuhn, T.S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merton, R.K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science. Science 159: 56–63.
Edwards, M.A., and S. Roy. 2017. Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition. Environmental Engineering Science 34: 51–61.
Gardner, S.K., and D. Veliz. 2014. Evincing the Ratchet: A Thematic Analysis of the Promotion and Tenure Guidelines at a Striving University. Review of Higher Education 38: 105–132.
Goldberg, D.M. 2011. Science at the Crossroads: Fact or Fiction. Journal of Medical Biochemistry 30: 79–92.
Binder, R., A. Friedli, and E. Fuentes-Afflick. 2016. The New Academic Environment and Faculty Misconduct. Academic Medicine 91: 175–179.
Fanelli, D. 2010. Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists’ Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data. PLos One 5.
Montgomery, K., and A.L. Oliver. 2009. Shifts in Guidelines for Ethical Scientific Conduct: How Public and Private Organizations Create and Change Norms of Research Integrity. Social Studies of Science 39: 137–155.
Charlton, B.G. 2009. Are you an Honest Scientist? Truthfulness in Science Should be an Iron Law, not a Vague Aspiration. Medical Hypotheses 73: 633–635.
Pflumm, M. 2011. NIH Funding Rates Drop to Record Lows. Nature Medicine 17: 637.
Lacetera, N., and L. Zirulia. 2012. The Economics of Scientific Misconduct (vol 27, pg 568, 2011). Journal of Law Economics & Organization 28: 183–183.
John, L.K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelec. 2012. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices with Incentives for Truth Telling. Psychological Science 23: 524–532.
Slaughter, S., and G. Rhoades. 1990. Renorming the Social Relations of Academic Science – Technology Transfer. Educational Policy 4: 341–361.
Glenna, L.L., R. Welsh, D. Ervin, W.B. Lacy, and D. Biscotti. 2011. Commercial Science, Scientists’ Values, and University Biotechnology Research Agendas. Research Policy 40: 957–968.
Evans, J.A. 2010. Industry Induces Academic Science to Know Less about More. American Journal of Sociology 116: 389–452.
Saiki, R., et al. 1988. Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification of DNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase. Science 239: 487–491.
Bower, D.J. 2003. Business Model Fashion and the Academic Spinout Firm. R & D Management 33: 97–106.
Valdivia, W.D. 2013. University Start-Ups: Critical for Improving Technology Transfer. Brookings Institution.
Gonzales, L.D., E. Martinez, and C. Ordu. 2014. Exploring Faculty Experiences in a Striving University Through the Lens of Academic Capitalism. Studies in Higher Education 39: 1097–1115.
Colombo, M.G., and E. Piva. 2008. Strengths and Weaknesses of Academic Startups: A Conceptual Model. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 55: 37–49.
Wall, M.E., and M.C. Wani. 1995. Camptothecin and Taxol – Discovery to Clinic – 13th Bruce F Cain Memorial Award Lecture. Cancer Research 55: 753–760.
———. 1998. History and Future Prospects of Camptothecin and Taxol. In Alkaloids, ed. G.A. Cordell, vol. 50, 509–536. New York: Academic Press.
Faguet, G.B. 2006. The War on Cancer: Anatomy of a Failure. New York: Springer.
Kolata, G. 2013. Hopeful Glimmers in Long War on Cancer. New York Times, November 4.
Clark, M. 1977. Laetrile: Should It be Banned? Newsweek 89: 48.
Bitting, T.H. 1978. Drugs – Federal Drug Administration Ban on Laetrile Treatments for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients is Arbitrary and Capricious. Tulsa Law Journal 14: 222–225.
Moertel, C.G., et al. 1982. A Clinical Trial of Amygdalin (Laetrile) in the Treatment of Human Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 306: 201–206.
Harris, R. 2017. Rigor Mortis: How Sloppy Science Creates Worthless Cures, Crushes Hope, and Wastes Billions. New York: Basic Books.
Howitz, K.T., et al. 2003. Small Molecule Activators of Sirtuins Extend Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Lifespan. Nature 425: 191–196.
Baur, J.A., et al. 2006. Resveratrol Improves Health and Survival of Mice on a High-Calorie Diet. Nature 444: 337–342.
Burnett, C., et al. 2011. Absence of Effects of Sir2 Overexpression on Lifespan in C. elegans and Drosophila. Nature 477: 482–485.
Couzin-Frankel, J. 2011. Aging Genes: The Sirtuin Story Unravels. Science 334: 1194–1198.
Doody, R.S., et al. 2008. Effect of Dimebon on Cognition, Activities of Daily Living, Behaviour, and Global Function in Patients with Mild-to-Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease: A Randomised, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Lancet 372: 207–215.
Hopkins, C.R. 2010. ACS Chemical Neuroscience Molecule Spotlight on Dimebon. Acs Chemical Neuroscience 1: 587–588.
Reed, M.A., C. Zhou, C.J. Muller, T.P. Burgin, and J.M. Tour. 1997. Conductance of a Molecular Junction. Science 278: 252–254.
Overton, R. 2000. Molecular Electronics Will Change Everything. Wired, July.
Weiss, E.A., J.K. Kriebel, M.A. Rampi, and G.M. Whitesides. 2007. The Study of Charge Transport Through Organic Thin Films: Mechanism, Tools and Applications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 365: 1509–1537.
Lieber, C.M. 2007. The Incredible Shrinking Circuit. Scientific American 17: 64–71.
Arkin, I.T. 2011. Science, Music, Literature and the One-Hit Wonder Connection. Research Trends, March.
Sampat, B.N. 2006. Patenting and US Academic Research in the 20th Century: The World Before and after Bayh-Dole. Research Policy 35: 772–789.
Carreyrou, J. 2015. Hot Startup Theranos has Struggled With Its Blood-Test Technology. The Wall Street Journal, October 16.
Kosloff, M. 2016. Theranos is Under Federal Criminal Investigation. Vanity Fair, April 19.
Tracy, A. 2016. Elizabeth Holmes’s Theranos Nightmare Just Got Even Worse. Vanity Fair, May 26.
Greenspan, N. 2009. The Hype of Science: Leading Journals Including Science and Nature are Exaggerating Research Novelty. The Scientist, April 14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Franzen, S. (2021). The Institutional Pressure to Become a Professor-Entrepreneur. In: University Responsibility for the Adjudication of Research Misconduct. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68063-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68063-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68062-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68063-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)