Abstract
Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been shown to be equal in terms of oncological benefit, while reducing the morbidity associated with open resection. In this chapter, we will describe our approach to minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy, including operative pearls and intraoperative troubleshooting guidance.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Then E, Lopez M, Saleem S, Gayam V, Sunkara T, Culliford A, Gaduputi V. Esophageal Cancer: an updated surveillance epidemiology and end results analysis. World J Onc. 2020;11(2):55–64. https://doi.org/10.14740/wjon1254.
Surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) 18 registries. National Cancer Institute. 2019. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/esoph.html.
Sgourakis G, Gockel I, Radtke A, Musholt TJ, Timm S, Rink A, Tsiamis A, Karaliotas C, Lang H. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy: meta-analysis of outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(11):3031–40.
Dantoc M, Cox MR, Eslick GD. Evidence to support use of minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012;147(8):768–76.
Singh RK, Pham T, Diggs B, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy provides equivalent oncologic outcomes to open esophagectomy for locally advanced (stage II or III) esophageal carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2011;146:711–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.2011.146.
Biere SS, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Garcia JR, van BergeHenegouwen MI, Rosman C, Sosef MN, de Lang ES, Bonjer HJ, Cuesta MA, van der Peet DL. Traditional invasive vs minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME trial). BMC Surg. 2011;11:2.
Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182590603.
Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, et al. Two thousand transhiatal esophagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann Surg. 2007;246:363–72; discussion 372-64
Metzger R, Bollschweiler E, Vallbohmer D, Maish M, DeMeester TR, Holscher AH. High volume cneters for esophagectomy: what is the number need to achieve postoperative mortality? Dis Esophagus. 2004;17(4):310–4.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harrington, C., Molena, D. (2021). Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy. In: Patti, M.G., Zureikat, A.H., Fichera, A., Schlottmann, F. (eds) Techniques in Minimally Invasive Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67940-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67940-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67939-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67940-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)