Skip to main content

From Fantasy to Transformation: Steps in the Policy Use of “Beyond-GDP” Indicators

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Well-being Transition

Abstract

This chapter considers various steps in the use of alternatives to Gross Domestic Product (GDP) as a prosperity indicator (i.e., “beyond-GDP” measurement), ranging from the “indicators fantasy”—the idea that simply producing alternative indicators is sufficient to generate substantially different policy outcomes—to transformative change involving a shift in societal priorities beyond growth or changes to other core features of the economic and social system. In between are intermediate steps such as political use of indicators to influence policy debates, conceptual use leading to new understandings of wellbeing and prosperity, and the integration of indicators into the policy process to enable a more direct connection between indicators and policy decisions (instrumental use). Such steps have expanded the possibilities for policy reform, with promising options that include the use of new cost-benefit analysis and policy assessment tools, wellbeing budgeting, and legislating or mandating indicator use. The chapter considers further steps needed for transformative change and the possibilities of a transitional goal—downplaying the centrality of GDP and economic growth, without abandoning either—which now appears to be within reach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I first encountered this idea in an interview with Charles Seaford, New Economics Foundation (NEF), in July 2014.

  2. 2.

    Interview, July 2020. See Dasilva and Hayden et al. (Forthcoming).

  3. 3.

    2018 data from UNDP (2019, pp. 300, 308).

  4. 4.

    2020 rankings: https://www.socialprogress.org/index/global/results.

  5. 5.

    2019 rankings: https://www.prosperity.com/rankings.

  6. 6.

    2020 rankings: https://sdgindex.org/reports/sustainable-development-report-2020/.

  7. 7.

    2020 rankings from Helliwell et al. (2020b, p. 19).

  8. 8.

    For an analysis of factors behind the Nordic countries high happiness levels, see Martela et al. (2020).

  9. 9.

    It divides each nation’s HDI score by the extent to which consumption-based CO2 emissions and material footprint exceed “per-capita shares of planetary boundaries.” See https://www.sustainabledevelopmentindex.org.

  10. 10.

    Some proponents of a well-being economy have argued that Scotland’s government needs to go further in its economic recovery strategy by moving beyond “strong economic growth” as a core goal and reducing dependence on growth as a means to generate well-being (WEAll Scotland 2020).

  11. 11.

    Such analysis showed, for example, that it made more economic sense for the state to purchase and protect wetlands and forests, and continue to enjoy ecological services such as water treatment, than to allow revenue-generating but environmentally damaging suburban development (GFN 2015).

  12. 12.

    The domains are health, education, living standards, ecological diversity and resilience, good governance, psychological well-being, time use, community vitality, and cultural diversity and resilience.

  13. 13.

    Colman, who highlights a lack of policy impact from beyond-GDP metrics, acknowledges the significance of Bhutan’s WTO decision, but sees little discernible influence of GNH on recent policies.

  14. 14.

    Such hopes have not always been fulfilled, as in the case of Maryland’s GPI (Hayden and Wilson 2018).

  15. 15.

    The domains are civic engagement and governance, cultural identity, environment, health, housing, income and consumption, jobs and earnings, knowledge and skills, safety, social connections, subjective well-being, and time use.

  16. 16.

    Some observers may consider well-being budgeting to be “transformative” in the way it changes the process of allocating public resources, although it is not transformative in the way that I am using the term in this chapter, as outlined in the introduction.

  17. 17.

    New Zealand had intended to deliver a second well-being budget in 2020. In January 2020, Icelandic Prime Minister Katrín Jakobsdóttir (2020) stated that a “well-being budget is in the works,” while Canada’s government was tentatively exploring the idea before COVID-19.

  18. 18.

    These goals are as follows: a Wales that is prosperous, resilient, healthier, more equal, globally responsible, a Wales of cohesive communities, and a Wales of vibrant culture and thriving Welsh language.

  19. 19.

    Laurent (Forthcoming) argues that although France’s Sas Law is useful, the government’s response has involved manipulation, as it selected indicators that put its record in a favorable light. Stewart (2020) raises questions about the Welsh approach’s impact.

  20. 20.

    The dashboard includes indicators that can all be seen as related to the overriding goal of economic growth, such as inter-provincial migration, international immigration, business start-ups, export value, labor-force participation, venture capital, tourism expansion, net debt to GDP, among others. See Dasilva and Hayden et al. (Forthcoming) and https://www.onens.ca/.

  21. 21.

    Interview, Juliet Michaelson, NEF, July 6, 2015.

  22. 22.

    This “Beyond Growth” report does not reject growth as an objective, but no longer sees it as the primary goal, highlighting four paramount objectives for economic policy: environmental sustainability, rising well-being, falling inequality, and system resilience.

  23. 23.

    Interview, Danny Graham, Engage Nova Scotia, June 2020.

References

  • APPGWE. (2014). Wellbeing in four policy areas: Report by the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wellbeing Economics. London: All-Party Parliamentary Group on Wellbeing Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baisden, T. (2019). How New Zealand’s well-being budget delivers for the environment. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrington-Leigh, C., & Galbraith, E. (2019). Feasible future global scenarios for human life evaluations. Nature Communications, 10, 161. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-08002-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, S., & Morse, S. (2011). An analysis of the factors influencing the use of indicators in the European Union. Local Environment, 16, 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2011.566851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleys, B., & Thiry, G. (Forthcoming). Beyond “Beyond GDP” in the EU: What’s next? In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleys, B., & Whitby, A. (2015). Barriers and opportunities for alternative measures of economic welfare. Ecological Economics, 117, 162–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.06.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Bhutan & GNH Studies. (n.d.). GNH policy & project screening tools. Retrieved June 22, 2020, from http://www.grossnationalhappiness.com/gnh-policy-and-project-screening-tools/.

  • Clarke, S. (2014). Town Creek Foundation stakeholder meeting. Easton, MD: Town Creek Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman, R. (Forthcoming). Time for a reality check: Lessons from Bhutan, Canada and New Zealand. In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corlet Walker, C., & Jackson, T. (2019). Measuring prosperity—Navigating the options. Guildford, UK: Centre for the Understanding of Sustainable Prosperity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasilva, C., & Hayden, A. (Forthcoming). Beyond dollars and cents: The Canadian index of wellbeing and Nova Scotia quality of life initiative. In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, M., & Exton, C. (2019). Adopting a well-being approach in central government: Policy mechanisms and practical tools. In Global Council for Happiness and Wellbeing (Ed.), Global happiness and wellbeing policy report 2019 (pp. 140–162). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engage, CIW. (2018). Nova Scotia quality of life index: 1994–2014. Halifax, NS: Engage Nova Scotia / Canadian Index of Wellbeing.

    Google Scholar 

  • GFN. (2015). Making the economic case for sustainable investments in Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. (2019). NZ has dethroned GDP as a measure of success, but will Ardern’s government be transformational? The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A. (2015). Bhutan: Blazing a trail to a postgrowth future? Or stepping on the treadmill of production? The Journal of Environment Development, 24, 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/1070496515579199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A., & Wilson, J. (2016). Is it what you measure that really matters? The struggle to move beyond GDP in Canada. Sustainability, 8, 623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A., & Wilson, J. (2017). “Beyond GDP” indicators: Changing the economic narrative for a post-consumerist society? In M. J. Cohen, H. S. Brown, & P. J. Vergragt (Eds.), Social change and the coming of post-consumer society: Theoretical advances and policy implications (pp. 170–191). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A., & Wilson, J. (2018). Taking the first steps beyond GDP: Maryland’s experience in measuring “genuine progress”. Sustainability, 10, 462. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, A., Gaudet, C., & Wilson, J. (Eds.). (Forthcoming). Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Huang, H., Wang, S., & Norton, M. (2020a). Social environments for world happiness. In J. F. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. Sachs, & J.-E. De Neve (Eds.), World happiness report 2020 (pp. 13–46). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J., & De Neve, J.-E. (Eds.). (2020b). World happiness report 2020. New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., Gyarmati, D., Joyce, C., & Orpana, H. (Forthcoming). Building an epidemiology of happiness. In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezri, A. A. (2004). Sustainability indicator system and policy processes in Malaysia: A framework for utilisation and learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 73, 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.07.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirvilammi, T. (2020). The virtuous circle of sustainable welfare as a transformative policy idea. Sustainability, 12, 391. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivany, R., D’Entremont, I., Christmas, D., et al. (2014). Now or never: An urgent call to action for all Nova Scotians: The report of the Nova Scotia Commission on building our new economy. Nova Scotia: Halifax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity without growth: Foundations for the economy of tomorrow (2nd ed.). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsdóttir, K. (2020). In Iceland, well-being is the measure of our success. Evening Standard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey, K., Wheatley, H., & Abdallah, S. (2016). The happy planet index 2016. London: New Economics Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., et al. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93, 57–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lange, S. (2018). Macroeconomics without growth: Sustainable economies in neoclassical. Keynesian and Marxian Theories, Metropolis-Verlag, Marburg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. (2020). Comment construire un État social-écologique libéré de la croissance? Les Notes de la FEP, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, É. (Forthcoming). Integrating well-being indicators in budgetary procedures: Four shades of sincerity. In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Layard, R., & O’Donnell, G. (2015). How to make policy when happiness is the goal. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, & J. Sachs (Eds.), World happiness report (pp. 76–87). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehtonen, M., Sébastien, L., & Bauler, T. (2016). The multiple roles of sustainability indicators in informational governance: Between intended use and unanticipated influence. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.05.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martela, F., Greve, B., Rothstein, B., & Saari, J. (2020). The Nordic exceptionalism: What explains why the Nordic countries are constantly among the happiest in the world. In J. Helliwell, R. Layard, J. Sachs, & J.-E. De Neve (Eds.), World happiness report 2020 (pp. 129–146). New York: Sustainable Development Solutions Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, J. A. (2015). Global initiatives in measuring human wellbeing: Convergence and divergence. Sheffield, UK: Centre for Wellbeing in Public Policy, University of Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan, R. (2019). NZ budget 2019: Support for lower-emission business, transport, land use. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintrom, M. (2019). New Zealand’s Wellbeing budget invests in population health. The Milbank Quarterly, 97, 893–896. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. (Forthcoming). Measuring what matters: Policy applications in New Zealand. In A. Hayden, C. Gaudet, & J. Wilson (Eds.), Towards sustainable wellbeing: Moving beyond GDP in Canada and the world. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nova Scotia. (2019). Business plan 2019–20: Department of Business. Halifax, NS: Province of Nova Scotia.

    Google Scholar 

  • NZ Government. (2019). The wellbeing budget. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M., McDonald, G., Forgie, V., et al. (2020). Beyond gross domestic product: The New Zealand genuine progress indicator to measure the economic, social and environmental dimensions of well-being from 1970 to 2016. Palmerston North, NZ: Massey University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick, A. (2019). Does new economics need wellbeing? New Economics Foundation. Retrieved March 23, 2019, from https://neweconomics.org/2019/03/does-new-economics-need-wellbeing?mc_cid=c5a6dde7e7&mc_eid=863939ed46.

  • Richters, O., & Simoneit, A. (2019). Growth imperatives: Substantiating a contested concept. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 51, 126–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.07.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinne, J., Lyytimäki, J., & Kautto, P. (2013). From sustainability to well-being: Lessons learned from the use of sustainable development indicators at national and EU level. Ecological Indicators, 35, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.09.023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, C. (2019). New Zealand’s “well-being budget”: How it hopes to improve people’s lives. The Conversation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K. (2012). Measuring wellbeing: Towards sustainability? London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Secretary General’s Advisory Group on a New Growth Narrative. (2019). Beyond growth: Towards a new economic approach. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi, Y., Joyce, C., Wall, R., et al. (2019). A life satisfaction approach to valuing the impact of health behaviours on subjective well-being. BMC Public Health, 19, 1547. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7896-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, C. (2020). Will wellbeing be a gimmick or a policy that changes lives? The Herald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Fitoussi, J.-P., & Durand, M. (2018). Beyond GDP—Measuring what counts for economic and social performance. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon, N. (2020). Wellbeing economy alliance conference: First Minister’s speech.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thinley, J. (2012). Address by the Hon’ble Prime Minister on well being and happiness at the UN Head Quarters, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury. (2018a). Our people, our country, our future: Living standards framework: Introducing the dashboard. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury. (2018b). Budget policy statement. Wellington, NZ: New Zealand Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trudeau, P. (2019). Minister of Middle Class Prosperity and Associate Minister of Finance mandate letter.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2019). Human development report 2019. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, P. A. (2019). Managing without growth: Slower by design, not disaster (2nd ed.). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • WEAll Scotland. (2020). WEAll Scotland’s initial response to the Scottish Government’s economic recovery report. Wellbeing Economy Alliance. Retrieved November 25, 2020, from http://dev.wellbeingeconomy.org/weall-scotlands-initial-response-to-the-scottish-governments-economic-recovery-report.

  • Whitby, A., et al. (2014). BRAINPOoL project final report: Beyond GDP—From measurement to politics and policy. Hamburg: World Future Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann, T., Lenzen, M., Keyßer, L. T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zencey, E. (2018). The 2018 Vermont genuine progress indicator report. The Vermont Genuine Progress Indicator Project, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Hayden .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hayden, A. (2021). From Fantasy to Transformation: Steps in the Policy Use of “Beyond-GDP” Indicators. In: Laurent, É. (eds) The Well-being Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67860-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67860-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67859-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67860-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics