Abstract
Drawing on philosopher Richard Sennett’s view of craftsmanship, this chapter argues that music education should address human incompleteness and ambiguity—as especially evident in contexts involving vulnerability. Music has often been seen as an indicator, but also as a means of overcoming unwanted psychological or social vulnerabilities. From another point of view, vulnerability may also be understood as a desired quality of openness needed for creativity and education—a quality that nevertheless requires appropriate safety mechanisms. These facets of vulnerability are illustrated through the schoolwork of the Swedish-German Duo Gelland, one of world’s foremost classical violin duos. Using brief contemporary compositions, the Gellands elicit children’s associative imagery, incorporating it in subsequent interpretations of the music in which the children may take part as conductors or musicians. Through interviews and observations from school workshops in Germany, it is shown how the Gellands create musical contexts in which children’s vulnerabilities can be safely exposed and transformed. At the same time, the musicians see children’s engagement as proving the social value of the music. In providing a neutralising arena for children’s sometimes frightening and violent realities, the Gellands demonstrate a model for “health musicianship”, challenging sharp distinctions between artistic, pedagogical and therapeutic realms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, F., & Bor, W. (2008). Can music preference indicate mental health status in young people? Australasian Psychiatry, 16(4), 284–288.
Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Avery.
Carson, S. (2011). Creativity and psychopathology: A shared vulnerability model. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 56(3), 144–153.
Espeland, M. (1987). Music in use: Responsive music listening in the primary school. British Journal of Music Education, 4(3), 283–297.
Furlong, M. J., Gilman, R., & Huebner, E. S. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Gelland, M. (2014). “…um etwas davon plötzlich aufleuchten zu lassen”: Darstellungsprobleme individuellen Erlebens. Zeitschrift ästhetische Bildung, 6(2), 2–7.
Holdhus, K. (2018). Teacher-musician collaborations on the move: From performance appreciation to dialogue. In C. Christophersen & A. Kenny (Eds.), Musician-teacher collaborations: Altering the chord (pp. 27–38). New York: Routledge.
Levine, S. K. (2009). Trauma, tragedy, therapy: The arts and human suffering. Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Martin, G., Clarke, M., & Pearce, C. (1993). Adolescent suicide: Music preference as an indicator of vulnerability. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 32(3), 530–535.
Matthews, R. (2015). Beyond toleration—Facing the other. In C. Benedict, P. Schmidt, G. Spruce, & P. Woodford (Eds.), Social justice in music education (pp. 238–249). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
McFerran, K. S. & Wölfl, A. (2015). Music, violence and music therapy with young people in schools: A position paper. Voices, 15(2). Available at: https://voices.no/index.php/voices/article/view/2280/2035. Viewed 9/19/2018.
Nakkula, M. J., & Toshalis, E. (2010). Understanding youth: Adolescent development for educators. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
Pavlicevic, M. (2000). Improvisation in music therapy: Human communication in sound. Journal of Music Therapy, 37(4), 269–285.
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2007). Dimensional schizotypy, autism, and unusual word associations in artists and scientists. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(2), 465–471.
Ruud, E. (2012). The new health musicians. In R. A. R. MacDonald, G. Kreutz, & L. Mitchell (Eds.), Music, health, and wellbeing (pp. 87–96). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Scheel, K. R., & Westefeld, J. S. (1999). Heavy metal music and adolescent suicidality: An empirical investigation. Adolescence, 34(134), 253–273.
Schwartz, K. D., & Fouts, G. T. (2003). Music preferences, personality style, and developmental issues of adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(3), 205–213.
Sennett, R. (2008). The craftsman. London: Allen Lane.
Wiggins, J. (2011). Vulnerability and agency in being and becoming a musician. Music Education Research, 13(4), 355–367.
Wilson, P. N. (1999). Hear and now: Gedanken zur improvisierten Musik. Hofheim, Germany: Wolke Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Huovinen, E. (2021). Approaching Vulnerability Through Contemporary Music: The Gelland Approach. In: Holdhus, K., Murphy, R., Espeland, M.I. (eds) Music Education as Craft. Landscapes: the Arts, Aesthetics, and Education, vol 30. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67704-6_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67704-6_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67703-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67704-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)