Abstract
Fueled by debates on the causes and consequences of biodiversity decline worldwide, many countries are now employing biodiversity monitoring programs of various scope, intensity and scale. While these programs will be important to set a baseline for managing a country´s biological diversity, the availability of detailed data may take too long for the urgently needed implementation of biodiversity-friendly action. Intensification of local agricultural land use and the high dynamics of landscape change are major reasons for current biodiversity losses. Hence, better use of published and unpublished data to inform predictive biodiversity monitoring under global change is needed. Here, we exemplarily show how existing experiments manipulating land-use drivers can be used to predict species responses to land-use change. In an experimental manipulation of temperate grassland plots, fertilizer addition and low mowing frequency increased the species richness of aboveground arthropods, while herbicide addition and frequent mowing reduced it. In a crop rotation experiment, temporal crop diversity slightly increased arthropod abundances, but crop identity had the strongest effect on arthropod abundance, showing that the type of crop grown may superimpose crop diversity effects on arthropod communities. Finally, in a wheat-bean intercropping experiment, we found that the legume-based farming systems under low-input management had higher diversity of flower-visiting insect taxa. In an upscaling exercise, we show how current crop distribution data from the pan-European LUCAS survey can be combined with insect biodiversity data to suggest an approach for predictive mapping of insect biodiversity. These can form the basis for scenario modeling that is based on experimental evidence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Commission Regulation (EU) No 1089/2010 of 23 November 2010 implementing Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards interoperability of spatial data sets and services, Date of publication: 2010-12-08; https://land.copernicus.eu/imagery-insitu/lucas/lucas-2012?tab=metadata.
- 2.
In a similar way, data from experiments and published data could be combined, if sampling effort is accounted for (e.g. by calculating rarefaction curves) and if reliability of methods is sufficiently documented.
References
Altieri M (1999) The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 74:19–31
Batáry P, Gallé R, Riesch F, Fischer C, Dormann CF, Mußhoff O, Császár P, Fusaro S, Gayer C, Happe A-K, Kurucz K, Molnár D, Rösch V, Wietzke A, Tscharntke T (2017) The former iron curtain still drives biodiversity–profit trade-offs in German agriculture. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1279–1284
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker BM, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48
Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SP, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354
Brandmeier J, Reininghaus H, Pappagallo S, Karley AJ, Kiær LP, Scherber C (2021) Intercropping in high input agriculture supports arthropod diversity without risking significant yield losses. Basic Appl Ecol 53:26–38
Crawley MJ, Johnston AE, Silvertown J, Dodd M, de Mazancourt C, Heard MS, Henman DF, Edwards GR (2005) Determinants of species richness in the Park Grass Experiment. Am Nat 165:179–192
Davis AS, Hill JD, Chase CA, Johanns AM, Liebman M (2012) Increasing cropping system diversity balances productivity, profitability and environmental health. PLoS ONE 7:e47149
Diamond J (1986) Overview: laboratory experiments, field experiments, and natural experiments. In: Diamond JM, Case TJ (eds) Community ecology. Harper & Row, New York, pp 3–22
Dicks LV, Ashpole JE, Dänhardt J, James K, Jönsson AM, Randall N, Showler DA, Smith RK, Turpie S, Williams D, Sutherland WJ (2014) Farmland conservation: evidence for the effects of interventions in northern and western Europe. Pelagic Publishing Ltd.
Ellis EC (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Philos Trans Ser A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:1010–1035
Everwand G, Scherber C, Tscharntke T (2013) Slug responses to grassland cutting and fertilizer application under plant functional group removal. Acta Oecol-Int J Ecol 48:62–68
Everwand G, Rösch V, Tscharntke T, Scherber C (2014) Disentangling direct and indirect effects of experimental grassland management and plant functional-group manipulation on plant and leafhopper diversity. BMC Ecol 14:1
Fischer M, Bossdorf O, Gockel S, Hansel F, Hemp A, Hessenmoller D, Korte G, Nieschulze J, Pfeiffer S, Prati D, Renner S, Schoning I, Schumacher U, Wells K, Buscot F, Kalko EKV, Linsenmair KE, Schulze ED, Weisser WW (2010) Implementing large-scale and long-term functional biodiversity research: the biodiversity exploratories. Basic Appl Ecol 11:473–485
Fox J, Weisberg S (2019) An R companion to applied regression, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Fritz S et al (2015) Mapping global cropland and field size. Glob Chang Biol 21:1980–1992
Gillespie MAK, Baude M, Biesmeijer J, Boatman N, Budge GE, Crowe A, Memmott J, Morton RD, Pietravalle S, Potts SG, Senapathi D, Smart SM, Kunin WE, Travis J (2017) A method for the objective selection of landscape-scale study regions and sites at the national level. Methods Ecol Evol 8:1468–1476
Haddad NM et al (2015) Habitat fragmentation and its lasting impact on Earth’s ecosystems. Sci Adv 1:e1500052
Hallmann CA, Sorg M, Jongejans E, Siepel H, Hofland N, Schwan H, Stenmans W, Muller A, Sumser H, Horren T, Goulson D, de Kroon H (2017) More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLoS ONE 12:e0185809
Hass AL, Brachmann L, Batary P, Clough Y, Behling H, Tscharntke T (2019) Maize-dominated landscapes reduce bumblebee colony growth through pollen diversity loss. J Appl Ecol 56:294–304
Holzschuh A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2008) Agricultural landscapes with organic crops support higher pollinator diversity. Oikos 117:354–361
Hurlbert SH (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecol Monogr 54:187–211
Hurlbert SH (2009) The ancient black art and transdisciplinary extent of pseudoreplication. J Comp Psychol 123:434–443
Karley AJ, Newton AC, Brooker RW, Pakeman RJ, Guy D, Mitchell C, Iannetta PPM, Weih M, Scherber C, Kiær LP (2018) DIVERSify-ing for sustainability using cereal-legume ‘plant teams’. Asp Appl Biol 138:57–62
Kennedy CM, Oakleaf JR, Theobald DM, Baruch-Mordo S, Kiesecker J (2019) Managing the middle: A shift in conservation priorities based on the global human modification gradient. Glob Chang Biol 25:811–826
Klein Goldewijk K, Beusen A, Doelman J, Stehfest E (2017) Anthropogenic land use estimates for the Holocene – HYDE 3.2. Earth Syst Sci Data 9:927–953
Lindenmayer D (2009) Large-scale landscape experiments: lessons from Tumut. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lindenmayer DB, Likens GE (2010) The science and application of ecological monitoring. Biol Conserv 143:1317–1328
Martino L, Fritz M (2008) New insight into land cover and land use in Europe: land use/cover area frame statistical survey: methodology and tools. Eurostat - Stat Focus 33:1–8
Meyer M, Ott D, Götze P, Koch H-J, Scherber C (2019) Crop identity and memory effects on aboveground arthropods in a long-term crop rotation experiment. Ecol Evol 9(12):7307–7323
Morin P (1998) Realism, precision, and generality in experimental ecology. In: Resetarits WJ Jr, Bernardo J (eds) Experimental ecology: issues and perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 50–70
Petersen U, Wrage N, Köhler L, Leuschner C, Isselstein J (2012) Manipulating the species composition of permanent grasslands—a new approach to biodiversity experiments. Basic Appl Ecol 13:1–9
Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, The R Core Team (2019) NLME: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1–140. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
Platt JR (1964) Strong Inference: certain systematic methods of scientific thinking may produce much more rapid progress than others. Science 146:347–353
R Core Team (2019) R - A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org
Romeis J, Meissle M, Alvarez-Alfageme F, Bigler F, Bohan DA, Devos Y, Malone LA, Pons X, Rauschen S (2014) Potential use of an arthropod database to support the non-target risk assessment and monitoring of transgenic plants. Transgenic Res 23:995–1013
RStudio Team (2019) RStudio: integrated development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA. http://www.rstudio.com/
Scherber C (2015) Insect responses to interacting global change drivers in managed ecosystems. Curr Opin Insect Sci 11:56–62
Scherber C et al (2010) Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment. Nature 468:553–556
Scherber C, Beduschi T, Tscharntke T (2018) Novel approaches to sampling pollinators in whole landscapes: a lesson for landscape-wide biodiversity monitoring. Landsc Ecol
Silvertown J, Poulton P, Johnston E, Edwards G, Heard M, Biss PM (2006) The park grass experiment 1856-2006: its contribution to ecology. J Ecol 94:801–814
Simons NK, Weisser WW (2017) Agricultural intensification without biodiversity loss is possible in grassland landscapes. Nat Ecol Evol 1:1136–1145
Tscharntke T, Batary P, Dormann CF (2011) Set-aside management: How do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity? Agric Ecosyst Environ 143:37–44
Tscharntke T et al (2012) Landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns and processes - eight hypotheses. Biol Rev (published online) 661–685
Urban MC et al (2016) Improving the forecast for biodiversity under climate change. Science 353
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S, 4th edn. Springer, New York
Warren R, Price J, Graham E, Forstenhaeusler N, VanDerWal J (2018) The projected effect on insects, vertebrates, and plants of limiting global warming to 1.5°C rather than 2°C. Science 791–795
Acknowledgements
The GrassMan project was funded by the State of Lower Saxony, the Volkswagen foundation (program “Niedersächsisches Vorab”)/Haeckel1b Cluster Functional Biodiversity Research. The Harste project was supported by the Institute of Sugar Beet Research (Göttingen, Germany). The DIVERSify project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under agreement No. 727284.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scherber, C. et al. (2021). Using Field Experiments to Inform Biodiversity Monitoring in Agricultural Landscapes. In: Mueller, L., Sychev, V.G., Dronin, N.M., Eulenstein, F. (eds) Exploring and Optimizing Agricultural Landscapes. Innovations in Landscape Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67448-9_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67447-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67448-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)