Abstract
This chapter compares the language of the post-Brexit period (based on a 50 million words corpus) with that of the run-up to the EU Referendum and the Scottish Independence Referendum to identify diachronic trends. It finds a noticeable drop-off in racist discourse post-EU Referendum and concerns about immigration alongside changes in the representation of migrants and migration, and articulation of worries about racism. It finds a shift in focus from sovereignty to discussion of democracy and independence. The three corpora track the rise of nationalism from indyref to Brexit, and the development of increasingly divisive and sometimes incendiary language in Parliamentary discourse and elsewhere. The chapter concludes by considering the destructive consequences of using such language and argues that the language we use matters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreouli, E., Greenland, K., & Figgou, L. (2020). Lay discourses about Brexit and prejudice: “Ideological creativity” and its limits in Brexit debates. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(2), 309–322.
BBC. (2019, September 27). Amber Rudd accuses Number 10 of language that ‘incites violence’. BBC News. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49854569. Accessed 31 August 2020.
Blain, N. (2016). Afterword: Reimagining Scotland in a new political landscape. In N. Blain & D. Hutcheson (Eds.) (with G. Hassan), Scotland’s Referendum and the media: National and international perspectives (pp. 228–241). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Charteris-Black, J. (2019). Metaphors of Brexit: No cherries on the cake? Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dearden, L. (2019, September 2). Islamophobic incidents rose 375% after Boris Johnson compared Muslim women to ‘letterboxes’, figures show. Independent.
Duffy, B., Hewlett, K., McCrae, J., & Hall, J. (2019). Divided Britain?: Polarisation and fragmentation trends in the UK. The Policy Institute, King’s College London.
Evans, G., & Menon, A. (2017). Brexit and British politics. Cambridge: Polity.
Farage, N. (2020). Nigel Farage: A champion of ideas and transformative change. https://www.nfarage.com/. Accessed 3 September 2020.
Foges, C. (2017, December 4). Brexit tribes are tearing our country in two. The Times.
Heath, A., & Richards, L. (2018). Nationalism, racism and identity: What connects Englishness to a preference for a hard Brexit. London School of Economics. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/englishness-racism-brexit/. Accessed 31 August 2020.
Higgins, M. (2019). Political masculinities and Brexit: Men of war. Journal of Language and Politics, 19(1), 1–18.
Hitwise. (2016, June 27). How did Britons react in the immediate aftermath of the Brexit vote? https://www.hitwise.com/en/2016/06/27/how-did-britons-react-in-the-immediate-aftermath-of-the-brexit-vote-2/. Accessed 25 June 2020.
Hix, S., Kaufmann, E., & Leeper, T.J. (2017). UK voters, including Leavers, care more about reducing non-EU than EU migration. British Politics and Policy at LSE.
Home Office Statistics (2019). Hate crime, England and Wales, 2018 to 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/hate-crime-england-and-wales-2018-to-2019. Accessed 15 January 2020.
Ipsos Mori. (2019, March 23). Britons are more positive than negative about immigration’s impact on Britain. https://www.ipsos.com/ipsos-mori/en-uk/britons-are-more-positive-negative-about-immigrations-impact-britain. Accessed 20 June 2020.
Kaufmann, E. (2017). Levels or changes?: Ethnic context, immigration and the UK Independence Party vote. Electoral Studies, 48, 57–69.
Komaromi, P. (2016). Post-referendum racism and xenophobia: The role of social media activism in challenging the normalisation of xeno-racist narratives. http://www.irr.org.uk/news/post-referendum-racism-and-the-importance-of-social-activism/. Accessed 31 August 2020.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Leadbetter, K. (2019, July 24). My appeal to Boris Johnson to embrace my late sister Jo Cox’s ‘more in common’ mission. Yorkshire Post.
Mann, R., & Fenton, S. (2017). Nation, class and resentment: The politics of national identity in England, Scotland and Wales. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Massie, A. (2015, March 8). To borrow the most incendiary saying of all: if Scotland rules England, I can foresee the Thames foaming with much blood. Mail on Sunday.
Office for National Statistics (2020, May). Migration statistics quarterly report. https://www.ons.gov.uk/. Accessed 24 June 2020.
O’Toole, F. (2016, June 19). Brexit is being driven by English nationalism. And it will end in self-rule. The Guardian.
Peck, T. (2016, June 20). Jo Cox remembered in Parliament tributes: ‘Jo understood that rhetoric has consequences’. Independent.
Rawnsley, A. (2019, September 29). Boris Johnson seeks to divide and conquer with his incendiary rhetoric. Guardian.
Sobolewska, M., & Ford, R. (2020). Brexit and Britain’s Culture Wars. Political Insight, 11(1), 4–7.
Stone, J. (2019, September 26). Boris Johnson’s ‘crass and dangerous’ rhetoric will fuel violence on UK’s streets, warns EU Commissioner. Independent.
Swain, J. (2016). Brexit debate on Twitter week ending March 27th. Medium. https://medium.com/neo4j/brexit-debate-on-twitter-week–ending-march-27th-2a18cf442878. Accessed 15 January 2020.
Virdee, S., & McGeever, B. (2018). Racism, crisis, Brexit. Ethnic and racial studies, 41(10), 1802–1819.
Wilson, G.K. (2017). Brexit, Trump and the special relationship. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(3), 543–557.
Zappettini, F. (2019). The Brexit referendum: How trade and immigration in the discourses of the official campaigns have legitimised a toxic (inter)national logic. Critical Discourse Studies, 16(4), 403–419.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douglas, F.M. (2021). Brexit and Beyond. In: Political, Public and Media Discourses from Indyref to Brexit. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67384-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67384-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67383-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67384-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)