Abstract
Karl Popper’s ideas on evolution in his 1986 Medawar lecture were remarkably close to Charles Darwin’s original distinction between artificial and natural selection, but at odds with the Modern Synthesis in giving an active role to organisms in the process of evolution. His ideas were also compatible with recent work showing the role of the harnessing of stochasticity in enabling this active agency. He also argued against the reduction of biology to chemistry. In this article we show: (1) That these ideas were also compatible with, and flowed from, his work on the Open Society. (2) That organisms are necessarily open systems. (3) That a multi-level analysis of organisms shows that there cannot be causal closure at the micro-level, as proposed by philosophers like Jaegwon Kim. (4) While Popper’s and Darwin’s distinction between active and passive forms of evolution is valid, there is, in the long term, no purely passive form of selection. Organisms also create their environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Actually, Darwin (1859) had already identified sexual selection briefly in The Origin of Species, 101–104.
- 2.
There are many demonstrations of this fact. For a brief account see Noble (2018).
- 3.
A note for future historians: this question might be settled when the Popper archive at The Hoover Institution, Stanford, becomes open to researchers in 2029.
References
Boyle, E.A., Li, Y., Pritchard, J.K.: An expanded view of complex traits: from polygenic to omnigenic. Cell 169, 1177–1186 (2017)
Brosnan, S.F., De Waal, F.B.: Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature 425, 297–299 (2003)
Corning, P.: Beyond the modern synthesis: a framework for a more inclusive biological synthesis. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 153, 5–12 (2020)
Darwin, C.: The origin of species. (1859) (Macmillan Collectors Library edition (2004))
Darwin, C.: The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Murray, London (1871) I: 35–36
Dawkins, R.: The selfish gene. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1976)
Ellis, G.F.R.: The causal closure of physics in real world contexts. Nous (2020) https://aeon.co/essays/heres-why-so-many-physicists-are-wrong-about-free-will
Essler, J.L., Marshall-Pescini, S., Range, F.: Domestication does not explain the presence of inequity aversion in dogs. Curr. Biol. 27, 1–5 (2017)
Ginsburg, S., Jablonka, E.: The evolution of the sensitive soul: learning and the origins of consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2019)
Heng, H.: Genome Chaos, rethinking genetics, evolution and molecular medicine. Academic Press, London (2019)
Hoffmann, P.M.: Life’s ratchet: how molecular machines extract order from chaos. Basic Books (2012)
Huxley, J.: Evolution: the modern synthesis. London, George Allen and Unwin (1942)
Jablonka, E.: The evolutionary implications of epigenetic inheritance. Interface Focus. 7, 20160135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2016.0135 (2017)
Kauffman, S.: Eros and logos. J. Theor. Hum.Ities 25(3) (2020)
Kim, J.: Mind in a physical world: an essay on the mind-body problem and mental causation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (2000)
Lamarck, J-B.: Philosophie Zoologique, original edition of 1809 with introduction by André Pichot. Flammarion, Paris (1809, 1994)
Li, Z., Woo, C.J., Iglesias-Ussel, M.D., Ronai, D., Scharff, M.D.: The generation of antibody diversity through somatic hypermutation and class switch recombination. Genes Dev. 18, 1–11 (2014)
Maynard, Smith J., Szathmary, E.: The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)
McClintock, B.: The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226, 792–801 (1984)
Muramatsu, M., Sankaranand, V.S., Anant, S., Sugai, K., K, Davidson, N.O. et al.: Specific expression of activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID), a novel member of the RNA-editing deaminase family in germinal center B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274, 18470–18476. (1999)
Murugan, J., Weltman, A., Ellis, G.F.R. (eds.): Foundations of space and time: reflections on quantum gravity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)
Niemann, H-J.: Nachwort des Herausgebers. In: Wissen und das Leib-Seele-Problem, edited by K. R. Popper (Mohr Siebeck, Tubingen), pp. S510–S546; (afterword of the publisher; K.R. Popper, Knowledge and the mind-body problem). Sections 31–33 (2012)
Niemann, H.-J.: Karl Popper and the two new secrets of life. Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen (2014)
Noble, D.: A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus. 2, 55–64 (2012)
Noble, D.: Evolution viewed from physics, physiology and medicine. Interface Focus. 7, 20160159 (2017)
Noble, D.: Central dogma or central debate? Physiol. 33, 246–249 (2018)
Noble, D.: Charles Darwin, Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, and 21st century arguments on the fundamentals of biology. Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 153, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2020.02.005 (2020)
Noble, D., Jablonka, E., Joyner, M.J., Muller, G.B., Omholt, S.W.: Evolution evolves: physiology returns to centre stage. J. Physiol. 592, 2237–2244 (2014)
Noble, R., Noble, D.: Was the watchmaker blind? Or was she one-eyed? Biology 6(4), 47 (2017)
Noble, R., Noble, D.: Harnessing stochasticity: how do organisms make choices? Chaos 28, 106309. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5039668 (2018)
Noble, R., Noble, D.: Can reasons and values influence action: how might intentional agency work physiologically? Under Rev. J. Gen. Philos. Sci. (2020)
Noble, R., Tasaki, K., Noble, P.J., Noble, D.: Biological Relativity requires circular causality but not symmetry of causation: so, where, what and when are the boundaries? Frontiers in Physiology 10, 827 (2019)
Pichot, A.: Introduction, in Philosophie Zoologique. Flammarion, Paris (1994)
Popper, K.R.: The open society and its enemies. Routledge, London (1945)
Popper, K.R.: Indeterminism is not enough. Encounter 40(4), 20–26 (1973)
Popper, K.R.: Three worlds. University of Michigan Tanner Lecture. https://tannerlectures.utah.edu/_documents/a-to-z/p/popper80.pdf. (1978)
Popper, K.R., Eccles, J.C.: The self and its brain. New York, Springer International (1977)
Saribasak, H., Gearhart, P.: Does DNA repair occur during somatic hypermutation? Seminar. Immunol. 24, 287–292 (2012)
Shapiro, J.A.: Evolution: a view from the 21st century. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle River, NJ (2011)
Weismann, A.: Die Allmacht der Naturzüchtung; eine Erwiderung an Herbert Spencer. Jena, Fischer, (the omnipotence of natural breeding; a reply to Herbert Spencer) (1893)
Acknowledgements
No funding supported this work. We have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Noble, D., Noble, R. (2021). Rehabilitation of Karl Popper’s Ideas on Evolutionary Biology and the Nature of Biological Science. In: Parusniková, Z., Merritt, D. (eds) Karl Popper's Science and Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67036-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67036-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67035-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67036-8
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)