figure a

Radionuclides

Methodology

Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Radionuclides in Dust Fallout

The depositional fluxes of the natural radionuclides (40K, 210Pb, and 7Be) and the man-made radionuclides (137Cs) were calculated using efficiency-calibrated ultralow background gamma spectrometry in nine sampling sites covering Kuwait (Fig. 6.1). The dust fallout samples were collected on a monthly basis. Four collectors were installed in each sampling location to collect the adequate sample mass required for radioactivity analysis. The composite samples were subjected to long counting times regarding attaining an acceptable detection limit and to resolve very low-intensity peaks.

The collected gamma spectra were analyzed by Genie-2000 (Canberra Inc, USA) using the spectral lines of the most intense gamma energy lines. The decay correction and building-up factor of 7Be during the sampling period (almost 30 days) were considered due to the relatively short half life of 7Be. The concentration of radionuclides in dry deposition fluxes (Bq m−2) per month was determined by multiplying their specific activities in Bq g−1 with the weight per unit area of the collector (g m−2) during sampling time (30 days).

The variety of all of the calculated radionuclides and depositional fluxes revealed a temporal tendency (i.e., highest in the spring months [February, March, April], when the precipitation rates are highest, and hence, more dust is washed out and the lowest in October–November of each year) (Fig. 6.2). The correlation of depositional dust fallout and the radionuclides fluxes was in the order of 40K; 137Cs ;  210Pb  and 7Be. The strongest correlation was with the terrestrial origin 40K (0.92), and the weakest was with the cosmogenic origin 7Be (0.67).

On the other hand, the spatial distributions of radionuclide depositional fluxes showed a site-dependent relationship that is similar to the spatial dust fallout: highest in the interior areas and gradually decreasing along the coastal line. Nevertheless, an exception of the cosmogenic radionuclide 7Be distribution was observed in some months because of possibly different climatologically conditions.

The averages of the depositional fluxes of similar months were gridded using the GIS (ArcGIS) software package and presented as averages on a monthly basis from October 2009 to August 2011.

  1. 1.

    Monthly spatial distribution of 7Be

Figures 6.3, 6.4, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, 6.11, 6.12, 6.13, 6.14 and 6.15 show the annual and monthly spatial deposition rates of the 7Be radionuclide in dust fallout during October 2009–October 2011. The minimum monthly deposition fluxes (2.4 Bq m−2) were observed in December, when the precipitation was the lowest. In contrast, the high concentration during the spring season (March–April–May) was due to rainfall during the period supporting the theory of wet precipitation commonly associated with the mixing of stratospheric and tropospheric air masses (Daish et al. 2005). In spring time, a rapid removal from lower polar troposphere to the troposphere at the northern hemisphere is well known (UNSCEAR 2000) and, possibly due to the folding of the troposphere during April and May at mid-latitude (30–50), enhances the removal of the stratospheric 7Be into the troposphere (Viezee and Singh 1980; Kritz et al. 1991). However, in contrast, the spatial distribution in the fall months (September–October–November) might be due to the effect of southeasterly wind contribution. The highest monthly readings (76.5 and 184 Bq m−2) were observed in January and April, respectively, due to the effect of a washout by precipitation.

  1. 2.

    Temporal, spatial distribution of 137Cs

137Cs is a human-made radionuclide with a half life of 30 years. It was produced during the atmospheric testing of thermonuclear weapons in the period extending from the mid-1950s to the 1980s. Global fallout of 137Cs began in 1954, peaked in the early 1960s and subsequently decreased, reaching near-zero levels in the mid-1980s. Fallout levels were globally variable, reflecting both annual precipitation amount and location relative to the main weapons tests (Walling 2002). Smaller amounts of 137Cs have been released into the atmosphere by catastrophes at nuclear power plants, notably the Chernobyl disaster in 1986, which resulted in additional outputs of 137Cs fallout over large areas of Europe and adjacent regions. However, wide measurements of 137Cs concentration have also been carried out in Kuwaiti aerosol, in cooperation with the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT) from 1995 to 1999. The reported 137Cs concentration in the air was between 1.44 and 107.84, with an average value of 10.6 μBq m−3 (Biegalski et al. 2001).

Figures 6.16, 6.17, 6.18, 6.19, 6.20, 6.21, 6.22, 6.23, 6.24, 6.25, 6.26, 6.27 and 6.28 illustrate the annual and monthly spatial deposition rates of 137Cs, which display similar behavior to 210Pb and 7Be variations. The correlation coefficients of 137Cs/210Pb and 137Cs/7Be were 0.87 and 0.94, respectively. The average monthly deposition rates varied from 0.02 to 4.18 Bq m−2, while the annual deposition rates varied from 0.2 to 50.21 Bq m−2. Based on the previous observations (e.g., the influence of precipitation, wind direction, and depositional dust rates), the dominant source of 137Cs fallout is the transportation of dust by the northwesterly wind, as the areas of northern Europe and eastern Mediterranean are most affected by 137Cs fallout (nuclear bomb tests and Chernobyl accident), more so than the Gulf Region.

  1. 3.

    Temporal, spatial distribution of40K

Figures 6.29, 6.30, 6.31, 6.32, 6.33, 6.34, 6.35, 6.36, 6.37, 6.38, 6.39, 6.40 and 6.41 illustrate the annual and monthly spatial deposition rates of 40K radionuclide in dust fallout. The highest 40K concentrations were observed in spring months, when it reached a maximum in March 2011 (96.27 Bq m−2) and the lowest in fall (1.8 Bq m−2), which is quite consistent with the dust loadings of the corresponding months. The annual variations of 40K concentration in dust fallout varied from 74 to 557 Bq m−2, as presented in Fig. 6.29. This quantity of the 40K deposition rate corresponds to about 412 Bq kg−1 and the average measured 40K concentration in Kuwaiti soil is 365 Bq kg−1, which is similar to the worldwide average concentration (420 Bq kg−1) (UNSCEAR 2000). The distribution of 40K monthly and seasonal variations displays similar behavior to the dust fallout trend. However, the site specificity of 40K is very similar to the dust deposition distribution, which is very low in the coastal zone, significantly increasing in the southwest of the country.

  1. 4.

    Temporal, spatial distribution of 210Pb

Figures 6.42, 6.43, 6.44, 6.45, 6.46, 6.47, 6.48, 6.49, 6.50, 6.51, 6.52, 6.53 and 6.54 illustrate the annual and monthly spatial deposition rates of 210Pb radionuclide in dust fallout from October 2009 to October 2011. The highest 210Pb concentrations were observed in spring (41.4 Bq m−2) and the lowest in fall (1.8 Bq m−2), which is quite consistent with the dust loadings of the corresponding months. However, the wet precipitation associated with Sarrayat and Koss played a major role in obtaining these high deposition fluxes (Aba et al. 2016, 2018; Al-Dousari et al. 2016). The monthly deposition ratios of 7Be and 210Pb are largely consistent with the dust loading in the corresponding months. However, an extreme deposition rate (63 Bq m−2) was observed in March 2011, when an exotic storm hit Kuwait .

Samples Locations

Figure 6.1.

Fig. 6.1
figure 1

Sampling locations of dust fallout and digital elevation model of Kuwait using ASTER stereo data

Temporal Variations of Radionuclides

Figure 6.2.

Fig. 6.2
figure 2

Temporal variations of radionuclide depositional fluxes in Kuwait

Annual Deposited Rates of 7Be

The average annual 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait from October 2009 to August 2011 varied from 339 to 481 Bq m−2, with an average similar (422 Bq m−2) to the reported data of the global model (400 Bq m−2). The maximum rates were found in a transect width of about 50 km from north to south. The minimum rates were shown along the transect from the middle of the country down to the southeastern part. The dominant annual wind direction is northwesterly (Fig. 6.3).

Fig. 6.3
figure 3

Average deposited rates of 7Be

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Dibdibah

Um Al Madafi’

Liyah

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

KhurFawaris

Khiran

Qurain

Monthly Deposited Rates of 7Be

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait January 2010–2011 reveal a range from 13.6 to 76.5 Bq m−2, with the maximum in northern areas and the lowest in southern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly (Fig. 6.4).

Fig. 6.4
figure 4

Average deposited rates of 7Be in January (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Um Eish

Raudhatain

Huwaymilyah

Salmi

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

KhurFawaris

Khiran

The monthly rates at which 7Be were deposited in Kuwait in February 2010–2011 which reveal a range from 36.08 to 63.83 Bq m−2, with three maximum spots. This possibly happened because of the effect of dust storms this month. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly (Fig. 6.5).

Fig. 6.5
figure 5

Average deposited rates of 7Be in February (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Bubiyan Bridge

Dibdibah

Wafra Farms

KhurFawaris

Subiyah

Salmi

Um Al Madafi’

Liyah

Shegaya

Um Eish

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during March 2010–2011 reveal a range from 28.63 to 57.54 Bq m−2, with a maximum in the central region with the northern, western wind corridor, and the lowest in the northern area. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with high speeds sometimes. However, the occurrence of dust storms was lower in February, as well as precipitation. Nevertheless, the effect of the exotic storm that hit Kuwait in March 2011 led to critical dynamic weather that could probably have decreased the 7Be deposition flux (Fig. 6.6).

Fig. 6.6
figure 6

Average deposited rates of 7Be in March (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Atraf

Um Al Madafi’

Liyah

Sulaybiyah

Kabd

Abdulli

Salmi

Subiyah

Shegaya

Ratqah

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during April 2010–2011 reveal the highest deposited rates, with a range from 106 to 184 Bq m−2, with a maximum in the northern and central areas and the lowest in eastern central areas. The major parameter affecting this high value was the higher precipitation rate in this month (Fig. 6.7).

Fig. 6.7
figure 7

Average deposited rates of 7Be in April (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Roudhatain

Liyah

Salmiya

Salmi

Atraf

Kabd

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during May 2010–2011 reveal a range from 27 to 69 Bq m−2, with a maximum in the southern, eastern and northern areas and the lowest in the southern areas. The high values are attributed to the high precipitation rates this month that increased the dust washout (Fig. 6.8).

Fig. 6.8
figure 8

Average deposited rates of 7Be in May (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Salmi

Shegaya

Dibdibah

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

Salmiya

Khiran

KhurFawaris

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during June 2010–2011 reveal a lower rate than previous months, with a range from 4.23 to 17.32 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in the northern and western areas, while the lowest were in the southern and eastern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events (Fig. 6.9).

Fig. 6.9
figure 9

Average deposited rates of 7Be in June (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Dibdibah

Subiyah

Ubayriq

Liyah

Wafra Farms

Salmi

Khiran

KhurFawaris

Similar to June, the monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during July 2010–2011 reveal lower rates than previous months, with a range from 3.71 to 11.78 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in the northern eastern areas and the lowest in the southern and northeastern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events to impact wind from other directions (Fig. 6.10).

Fig. 6.10
figure 10

Average deposited rates of 7Be for July (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Salmi

Shegaya

Dibdibah

Ubayriq

Bubiyan Island

Liyah

Wafra Farms

Huwaymilyah

Khiran

KhurFawaris

Similar to June and July, the monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during August 2010–2011 reveal a range from 3.66 to 29.49 Bq m−2, with a maximum in the northern areas and the lowest in the southeastern area (Fig. 6.11).

Fig. 6.11
figure 11

Average deposited rates of 7Be in August (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Roudhatain

Um Niqa

Huwaymilyah

Um Madafi’

Wafra Farms

Subiyah

Salmi

Atraf

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during September 2010–2011 reveal low rates, ranging from 2.44 to 11.6 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the northern areas and the lowest in the southern and southeastern areas (Fig. 6.12).

Fig. 6.12
figure 12

Average percentages of 7Be in September (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Ratqah

Roudhatain

Dibdibah

Huwaymilyah

Salmi

Wafra Farms

Shegaya

Khiran

KhurFawaris

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 7Be rates deposited in Kuwait during October 2009–2010 reveal a lower rate, ranging from 5.59 to 16.09 Bq m−2, with a maximum in northeast areas, and lowest in the southern areas (Fig. 6.13).

Fig. 6.13
figure 13

Average deposited rates of 7Be in October (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Salmi

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Salmiya

Liyah

Wafra Farms

Urayfijan

Khiran

KhurFawaris

The monthly 7Be deposited rates in Kuwait during November 2009–2010 reveal moderate rates that range from 4.53 to 48.04 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the central areas and the lowest in the southern, northern, and northwestern regions. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly at a minimum speed (Fig. 6.14).

Fig. 6.14
figure 14

Average deposited rates of 7Be in November (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Atraf

Abdulli

Subiyah

Urayfijan

Khiran

KhurFawaris

The monthly 7Be rates deposited in Kuwait during December 2009–2010 reveal moderate rates that range from 3.69 to 46.96 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the central and central western areas and the lowest in the central southern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly at high speed (Fig. 6.15).

Fig. 6.15
figure 15

Average deposited rates of 7Be in December (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Gudhi

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

Subiyah

Sulaybiyah

Kabd

Atraf

Annual Deposited Rates of 137Cs

The average annual 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait from October 2009 to August 2011 varied from 0.2 to 4.18 Bq m−2, with an average of 4.76 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in southwestern areas. The 137Cs rates deposited gradually decreased from the interior to the coastal areas, where they reached the minimum value. The predominant annual wind direction was northwesterly (Fig. 6.16).

Fig. 6.16
figure 16

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in (Oct 2009–Aug 2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Salmi

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Ratqa

Sulaybiyah

Bubiyan Island

Subiyah

Failaka Island

Monthly Deposited Rates of 137Cs

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during January 2010–2011 reveal a range from 0.1 to 0.39 Bq m−2, with the maximum in central and southwestern areas and the lowest in southern areas of the Wafra Farms. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with high wind speed sometimes (Fig. 6.17).

Fig. 6.17
figure 17

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in January (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Al Madafi’

Ratqah

Salmi

Subiyah

Sulaybiyah

Khiran

KhurFawaris

The monthly 137Cs deposited rates in Kuwait during February 2010–2011 varied from 0.21 to 0.54 Bq m−2, with two high deposition rate spots. This possibly happened because of the effect of the dust storms in this month. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, and the precipitation rates were low (Fig. 6.18).

Fig. 6.18
figure 18

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in February (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Salmi

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Salmiya

Ratqah

Liyah

Roudhatain

Sulaybiyah

Atraf

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during March 2010–2011 reveal a high range that varied from 0.26 to 2.35 Bq m2, with the maximum in the southwestern area and the lowest in the northern and southern regions. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with high speed sometimes. However, the highest deposition flux was reported in this month due to the effect of the exotic storm that hit Kuwait, in addition to the high precipitation recorded (Fig. 6.19).

Fig. 6.19
figure 19

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in March (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Kabd

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Ratqa

Subiyah

Bubiyan Island

Salmiya

Wafra Farms

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during April 2010–2011 ranged from 0.67 to 1.4 Bq m−2, which is considered high, but it is less than March due to lower precipitation. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with a high wind speed of northeasterly, easterly, and southeasterly direction (Fig. 6.20).

Fig. 6.20
figure 20

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in April (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Huwaymilyah

Um Al Madafi’

Subiyah

Bubiyan Island

Sulaybiyah

Kabd

Jal Al Zur

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during May 2010–2011 ranged from 0.22 to 2.23 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southeastern and central regions. The lowest deposition fluxes were in the southern and eastern areas. However, the slightly high deposition flux in this month was due to the effect of the exotic storm that hit Kuwait on March 25, 2011 (Fig. 6.21).

Fig. 6.21
figure 21

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in May (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Huwaymilyah

Liyah

Subiyah

Bubiyan Island

Salmiya

Wafra Farms

Shuaiba

The monthly 137Cs deposited rates in Kuwait during June 2010–2011 display similar rates to previous months, but with lower minimum rates, the range varied from 0.06 to 1.3 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in southeast areas, and the lowest was in central areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events (Fig. 6.22).

Fig. 6.22
figure 22

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in June (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Liyah

Kabd

Abdulli

Atraf

Mutla

Wafra Farms

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during July 2010–2011 showed similar rates to the other summer months. The range of deposition flux varied between 0.09 and 1.39 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in northeastern areas and the lowest in southern and northeastern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events that impact wind from other directions (Fig. 6.23).

Fig. 6.23
figure 23

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in July (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Ratqah

Um Al Madafi’

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during August 2010–2011 showed similar rates in June and July, with a range that varied from 0.07 to 1.23 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southwestern areas and the lowest in the southern areas (Fig. 6.24).

Fig. 6.24
figure 24

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in August (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Shegaya

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Ratqah

Um Al Madafi’

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during September 2010–2011 ranged from 0.05 to 0.87 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southwestern areas and the lowest in northern and central areas. The predominant wind direction in this month was northwesterly, with no contribution from other directions (Fig. 6.25).

Fig. 6.25
figure 25

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in September (2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Liyah

Abdulli

Ratqah

Um Al Madafi’

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during October 2010–2011 ranged from 0.07 to 0.72 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southwestern areas and the lowest in northern and central eastern areas. The predominant wind direction in this month was northwesterly, with no contribution from other directions (Fig. 6.26).

Fig. 6.26
figure 26

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in October (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Qudayr

Salmi

Um Al Madafi’

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during November 2009–2010 showed moderate rates ranging from 0.06 to 1.54 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the central and eastern areas and the lowest in southern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly with minimum speed (Fig. 6.27).

Fig. 6.27
figure 27

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in November (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Shegaya

Salmi

Ratqah

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 137Cs rates deposited in Kuwait during December 2009–2010 reveals lower rates than during summer. The deposition rates varied from 0.04 to 0.17 Bq m−2, with the maximum value observed along the transect from the central to southwestern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with high speed at times (Fig. 6.28).

Fig. 6.28
figure 28

Average deposited rates of 137Cs in December (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Al Madafi’

Liyah

Abdulli

Subiyah

KhurFawaris

Khiran

Wafra Farms

Annual Deposited Rates of 40K

The average annual 40K deposited rates in Kuwait from October 2009 to August 2011 varied from 74 to 557 Bq m−2, with an average of about 160 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were found in the southwestern areas. The 40K deposited rates gradually decreased from the interior to the coastal areas, where it reached the minimum. The predominant annual wind direction was northwesterly (Fig. 6.29).

Fig. 6.29
figure 29

Average deposited rates of 40K in (Oct 2009–Aug 2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Um Eish

Liyah

Abdulli

Subiyah

Atraf

Salmiya

Wafra Farms

Monthly Deposited Rates of 40K

The monthly 40K deposited rates in Kuwait during January 2010–2011 ranged from 1.14 to 15.62 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southeastern and western areas, and the lowest was in the central areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with high wind speed at times (Fig. 6.30).

Fig. 6.30
figure 30

Average deposited rates of 40K in January (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Salmi

Wafra Farms

Abdulli

Subiyah

Liyah

Salmiya

Sulaybiyah

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during February 2010–2011 varied from 3.13 to 23.0 Bq m−2, with a high deposition rate noted in southeastern areas. This possibly happened because of dust storms that occurred in this month. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, and the precipitation rates were low (Fig. 6.31).

Fig. 6.31
figure 31

Average deposited rates of 40K in February (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Um Qudayr

Abdulli

Subiyah

Um Al Madafi’

Salmiya

Sulaybiyah

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during March 2010–2011 had a high range that varied from 5.19 to 96.27 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southwestern area and the lowest in the northern and southern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with high speed registered at times. However, the highest deposition flux was reported in this month because of the effect of the exotic storm that hit Kuwait, in addition to high precipitation (Fig. 6.32).

Fig. 6.32
figure 32

Average deposited rates of 40K in March (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Um Qudayr

Abdulli

Subiyah

Wafra Farms

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during April 2010–2011 ranged from 12.88 to 69.77 Bq m−2, which is considered high but is lower than the rates in March due to lower precipitation rates. A spot with high deposition rates was found in the central areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with a high wind speed of northeastern, eastern, and southeastern wind contribution. The critical dynamic weather due to Koss and Sarrayat that occurred in spring contributed toward the high deposition rates (Fig. 6.33).

Fig. 6.33
figure 33

Average deposited rates of 40K in April (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Gudhi

Abdulli

Subiyah

Wafra Farms

Shuaiba

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during May 2010–2011 ranged from 5.12 to 70.63 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southeastern and central areas. This range is similar to the other spring months, in which the critical dynamics weather due to Koss and Sarrayat contributed toward high deposition rates. The lowest deposition fluxes were in southern and eastern areas. However, the high deposition flux this month was due to the effect of the exotic storm that hit Kuwait on March 25, 2011 (Fig. 6.34).

Fig. 6.34
figure 34

Average deposited rates of 40K in May (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Kabd

Abdulli

Jal Al Zur

Wafra Farms

Shuaiba

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 40K deposited rates in Kuwait during June 2010–2011 had similar rates as previous months, but with lower minimum rates, the range varied from 4.53 to 60.43 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in southeastern areas, and the lowest was in coastal areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events (Fig. 6.35).

Fig. 6.35
figure 35

Average deposited rates of 40K in June (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Um Qudayr

Abdulli

Salmi

Salmiya

Sulaybiyah

Kabd

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during July 2010–2011 were similar to the other summer months. The range of deposition varied between 2.31 and 61.76 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in southeastern areas, and the lowest rates were in southern and northeastern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events or impact wind from other directions (Fig. 6.36).

Fig. 6.36
figure 36

Average deposited rates of 40K in July (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Um Qudayr

Abdulli

Subiyah

Salmiya

Salmi

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during August 2010–2011 had a similar trend to June and July, with a low range that varied from 2.23 to 27.63 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southwestern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with a minor contribution made by southeastern wind (Fig. 6.37).

Fig. 6.37
figure 37

Average deposited rates of 40K in August (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Bubiyan Island

Abdulli

Salmi

Salmiya

Sulaybiyah

Wafra Farms

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during September 2010–2011 ranged from 1.55 to 41.61 Bq m−2, with the maximum recorded in southwestern areas and the lowest recorded in northern and central coastal areas. The predominant wind direction in this month was northwesterly, with no contribution from other directions (Fig. 6.38).

Fig. 6.38
figure 38

Average deposited rates of 40K in September (2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Shegaya

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Salmi

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

Wafra Farms

Similar to summer, the monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during October 2010–2011 ranged from 1.56 to 61.32 Bq m−2, with the maximum in southwestern areas and the lowest in northern and central eastern areas. The predominant wind direction of this month was northwesterly, with no contribution from other directions (Fig. 6.39).

Fig. 6.39
figure 39

Average deposited rates of 40K in October (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ratqah

Huwaymilyah

Subiyah

Salmi

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

Wafra Farms

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during November 2009–2010 were low, ranging from 1.28 to 21.28 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the central and southwestern areas and the lowest in the southern and northern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with high speed recorded at times (Fig. 6.40).

Fig. 6.40
figure 40

Average deposited rates of 40K in November (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Shegaya

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Subiyah

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

Wafra Farms

The monthly 40K rates deposited in Kuwait during December 2009–2010 were moderate and ranged from 1.91 to 31.12 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southwestern areas and the lowest in the southern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with high speed at times (Fig. 6.41).

Fig. 6.41
figure 41

Average deposited rates of 40K in December (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Shegaya

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Subiyah

Salmi

Bubiyan Island

Wafra Farms

Annual Deposited Rates of 210Pb

The average annual 210Pb rates deposited in Kuwait from October 2009 to August 2011 varied from 107 to 233 Bq m−2, with an average of about 134 Bq m−2, which is close to the reported 210Pb annual deposition rates on the continent between 10° and 30° N latitude (160 Bq m−2). The maximum rates were in the southeastern part of the country (Shaqaya). The minimum rates were along the coastal areas. A maximum of 210Pb deposition flux was revealed in the spring months; when the precipitation was high, the predominant annual wind direction was northwesterly (Fig. 6.42).

Fig. 6.42
figure 42

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in (October 2009–August 2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Ubayriq

Dibdibah

Liyah

Shegaya

Huwaymilyah

Abdulli

Subiyah

Salmi

Bubiyan Island

Wafra Farms

Monthly Deposited Rates of 210Pb

The monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during January 2010–2011 ranged from 4.9 to 16.73 Bq m−2, with the maximum in central areas and the lowest in southern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly (Fig. 6.43).

Fig. 6.43
figure 43

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in January (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ratqah

Um Al Madafi’

Salmi

Sulaybiyah

KhurFawaris

Khiran

Wafra Farms

The monthly 210Pb rates deposited in Kuwait during February 2010–2011 ranged from 9.39 to 16.6 Bq m−2, with three maximum spots. This is possibly visible because of the effect of dust storms this month. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, and the precipitation rates were lower (Fig. 6.44).

Fig. 6.44
figure 44

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in February (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Bubiyan Island

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ratqah

Subiyah

Salmi

Sulaybiyah

Liyah

Atraf

Kabd

The monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during February 2010–2011 ranged from 9.39 to 16.6 Bq m−2, with three maximum spots. This is possibly visible because of the effect of dust storms this month. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, and the precipitation rates were lower (Fig. 6.45).

Fig. 6.45
figure 45

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in March (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ubayriq

Um Al Madafi’

Salmi

Subiyah

Ratqah

Salmiya

Wafra Farms

The monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during April 2010–2011 ranged from 22.36 to 41.38 Bq m−2. The major parameter affecting this high value was the high precipitation rate. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with a high wind speed of northeastern, eastern, and southeastern wind contribution (Fig. 6.46).

Fig. 6.46
figure 46

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in April (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Liyah

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Ratqah

Doha

Salmi

Sulaybiyah

Subiyah

Kabd

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 210Pb rates deposited in Kuwait during May 2010–2011 ranged from 8.19 to 30.44 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southeastern and central areas. The lowest deposition fluxes were in the southern and eastern areas. However, the slightly high deposition flux in this month was because of the effect of the exotic that storm hit Kuwait on March 25, 2011 (Fig. 6.47).

Fig. 6.47
figure 47

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in May (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ubayriq

Kabd

Doha

Subiyah

Ratqah

Salmiya

Wafra Farms

The monthly 210Pb rates deposited in Kuwait during June 2010–2011 were lower compared with previous months, with a range from 4.17 to 20.2 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in the southeastern areas and the lowest in the central areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events (Fig. 6.48).

Fig. 6.48
figure 48

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in June (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ubayriq

Bubiyan Island

Doha

Sulaybiyah

Ratqah

Salmi

Wafra Farms

Similar to June, the monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during July 2010–2011 were lower when compared with previous months. The range of deposition fluxes varied between 3.09 and 15.48 Bq m−2. The maximum rates were in the northeastern areas and the lowest in the southern and northeastern areas. The predominant wind direction for this month was northwesterly, with no precipitation events or impact wind from other directions (Fig. 6.49).

Fig. 6.49
figure 49

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in July (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ubayriq

Kabd

Doha

Subiyah

Ratqah

Salmiya

Bubiyan Island

The monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during August 2010–2011 were lower than in June and July, with a range that varied from 2.16 to 9.72 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the northern and southwestern areas, and the lowest within the transect along the northwesterly wind corridor (Fig. 6.50).

Fig. 6.50
figure 50

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in August (2010–2011)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Ratqah

Ubayriq

Bubiyan Island

Doha

Sulaybiyah

Um Al Madafi’

Salmi

Wafra Farms

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during September 2010–2011 had low rates that ranged from 1.8 to 10.64 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the northwestern areas and the lowest in the southern and southwestern areas. The predominant wind direction in this month was northwesterly, with no contribution from other directions (Fig. 6.51).

Fig. 6.51
figure 51

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in September (2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Liyah

Ubayriq

Kabd

Doha

Sulaybiyah

Failaka Island

Salmi

Wafra Farms

Similar to the summer months, the monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during October 2009–2010 showed low rates, with a range that varied from 2.52 to 8.74 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southeastern and northern areas and the lowest along the northwesterly wind corridor (Fig. 6.52).

Fig. 6.52
figure 52

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in October (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Abdulli

Dibdibah

Ratqah

Ubayriq

Shegaya

Doha

Sulaybiyah

Um Al Madafi’

Khiran

Wafra Farms

The monthly 210Pb deposited rates in Kuwait during November 2009–2010 were moderate, ranging from 5.25 to 14.2 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the central and southeastern areas and the lowest in the southern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly at a minimum speed (Fig. 6.53).

Fig. 6.53
figure 53

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in November (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Huwaymilyah

Dibdibah

Doha

Ubayriq

Bubiyan Island

Abdulli

Sulaybiyah

Ratqah

Salmi

Wafra Farms

The monthly 210Pb rates deposited in Kuwait during December 2009–2010 were similar to November. The rates varied from 4.74 to 14.06 Bq m−2, with the maximum in the southwestern and central eastern areas. The predominant wind direction was northwesterly, with high speed at times (Fig. 6.54).

Fig. 6.54
figure 54

Average deposited rates of 210Pb in December (2009–2010)

Areas with high radionuclide concentration

Areas with low radionuclide concentration

Doha

Dibdibah

Ratqah

Ubayriq

Um Al Madafi’

Ratqah

Sulaybiyah

Salmi

Khiran

Wafra Farms