Skip to main content

Integration of the Arts and Humanities with Environmental Science in the LTER Network

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Challenges of Long Term Ecological Research: A Historical Analysis

Part of the book series: Archimedes ((ARIM,volume 59))

Abstract

A broad spectrum of arts and humanities activities has emerged organically within the Long Term Ecological Research (LTER) program including disciplines such as philosophy and ethics, creative writing, and the visual, multimedia, musical, and performing arts. The majority of LTER sites now hosts activities that integrate the environmental sciences with the arts and humanities (eSAH). These programs serve important functions central to the LTER mission, including, but not limited to, public engagement, outreach, and education. Some LTER eSAH programs additionally consider these activities as steps toward the aspirational goal of helping society address grand social-ecological challenges of the twenty-first century, challenges that science alone cannot overcome. The arts and humanities can offer critical dimensions to this mission and to outreach, education, and general edification, such as awakening and engaging ethics, values, empathy, and wonder in individuals and societies. In this chapter, we reflect upon eSAH efforts across the LTER network, including their history, value to LTER’s mission, challenges, and aspirations and share case studies of eSAH activities from several LTER programs, including their objectives, organizational models, audiences, and outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.transartists.org/air/artists_in_labs_projects.7686.html

  2. 2.

    https://arts.brown.edu/theme/arts-environment-2017-2020

  3. 3.

    https://capefarewell.com/

  4. 4.

    https://climarte.org

  5. 5.

    http://ihopenet.org/

  6. 6.

    https://www.sciartinitiative.org/

  7. 7.

    http://www.symbiotica.uwa.edu.au/

  8. 8.

    http://www.theiff.org/

  9. 9.

    Some of these activities can be viewed through the associated social media hashtag, #ArtSciConverge

  10. 10.

    (1) Markets the science, (2) Stimulates collaboration, (3) Develops observational skills, (4) Contributes to environmental problem-solving, (5) Fosters outreach, (6) Provides opportunities for education, (7) Plays a role on grants, (8) Is good in and of itself, (9) Enables interdisciplinary scholarship, (10) Broadens our understanding of the natural world, (11) Stimulates empathy, (12) Enhances the science, (13) Inspires creative thinking.

  11. 11.

    (1) Understanding, (2) Synthesis, (3) Information, (4) Legacies, (5) Education, (6) Outreach, (7) Conservation, (8) Communication, (9) Environmental Impact, (10) Relationship building, (11) Long-term Ecological Research, (12) Human dimensions.

  12. 12.

    (1) Funding, (2) Time, available labor, (3) Available expertise, (4) Clear vision or goals, (5) Lack of alignment with research, (6) Scheduling, (7) Limited relationships, (8) Limited space, (9) Challenging to find collaborators, (10) Little on-site interest, (11) Not in LTER purview.

  13. 13.

    https://liberalarts.oregonstate.edu/centers-and-initiatives/spring-creek-project/programs-and-residencies/long-term-ecological-reflections/forest-log

References

  • Berkes, F., J. Colding, and C. Folke. 2002. Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511541957.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A. 2014. Exhibiting climate change: An examination of the thresholds of arts-science collaborations in the context of learning for a sustainable future. Ph.D. dissertation, York University, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, N., C. Goodrich, and F.J. Swanson. 2016. Forest under story: Creative inquiry in an old-growth forest. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K., N. Eernstman, A.R. Huke, and N. Reding. 2017. The drama of resilience: Learning, doing, and sharing for sustainability. Ecology and Society 22 (2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09145-220208.

  • Burns, H.L. 2015. Transformative sustainability pedagogy: Learning from ecological systems and indigenous wisdom. Journal of Transformative Education 13 (3): 259–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J.T. 1984. Long-term ecological research. Bioscience 34 (6): 363–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demaray, E. 2014. Work samples from the field of art and science collaboration. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 4: 183–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman, H. 2008. Sustainability, art and reflexivity: Why artists and designers may become key change agents in sustainability. In Sustainability: A new frontier for the arts and cultures, ed. S. Kagan and V. Kirchberg, 108–146. Frankfurt, Germany: Verlag fur Akademische Schriften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, D., H. Hawkins, and M. Ingram. 2011a. Blurring the boundaries. Nature 472: 417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, D., E. Straughan, and H. Hawkins. 2011b. When artists enter the laboratory. Science 331: 860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frodeman, R., J.T. Klein, and C. Mitcham. 2010. The Oxford handbook of Interdisciplinarity. 1st ed. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabrys, J., and K. Yusoff. 2012. Arts, sciences and climate change: Practices and politics at the threshold. Science as Culture 21 (1): 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2010.550139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik, L., and M.P. Nelson. 2015. Empathy and agency in the Isle Royale field philosophy experience. Journal of Sustainability Education 10. http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/content/empathy-and-agency-in-the-isle-royale-field-philosophy-experience_2015_12/. Accessed 20 June 2020.

  • Goralnik, L. and M.P. Nelson. 2017. Field philosophy: Environmental learning and moral development in Isle Royale National Park. Environmental Education Research 23 (5): 687–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1074661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik, L., M.P. Nelson, H. Gosnell, and L. Ryan. 2015. Arts and humanities efforts in the US LTER Network: Understanding perceived values and challenges. In Earth stewardship: Linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice, ed. R. Rozzi, F.S. Chapin, J.B. Callicott, S.T.A. Pickett, M.E. Power, J.J. Armesto, and R.H. May Jr., 249–268. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goralnik, L., M.P. Nelson, H. Gosnell, and M.B. Leigh. 2017. Arts and humanities inquiry in the long-term ecological research network: Empathy, relationships, and interdisciplinary collaborations. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences 7 (2): 361–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holm, P., M.E. Goodsite, S. Cloetingh, M. Agnoletti, B. Moldan, D.J. Lang, R. Leemans, J.O. Moeller, M.P. Buendía, W. Pohl, R.W. Scholz, A. Sors, B. Vanheusden, K. Yusoff, and R. Zondervan. 2013. Collaboration between the natural, social and human sciences in global change research. Environmental Science and Policy 28: 25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtman, N. 2012. Forms from the sea. Terra 8:20–25. http://terra.oregonstate.edu/2012/10/forms-from-the-sea/. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.

  • Ingram, M. 2011. Eliciting a response through art. Nature Climate Change 1: 133–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, S.K., M.D. Mcduff, and M.C. Monroe. 2007. Promoting conservation through the arts: Outreach for hearts and minds. Conservation Biology 21 (1): 7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys, T. 2018. Experiments in the field: Why are artists and scientists collaborating? Frieze: https://frieze.com/article/experiments-field-why-are-artists-andscientists-collaborating. Accessed February 21, 2018.

  • Jones, P., D. Selby, and S. Sterling, eds. 2010. Sustainability education: Perspectives and practice across higher education. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimmerer, R.W. 2016. Interview with a watershed. In Forest under story: Creative inquiry in an old growth forest, ed. N. Brodie, C. Goodrich, and F.J. Swanson, 41–49. Seattle: Washington University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorkowski, J., and V. Kreinovich. 2015. Why awe makes people more generous: Utility theory can explain recent experiments. University of Texas El Paso Departmental Technical Reports. Paper 927. http://digitalcommons.utep.edu/cs_techrep/927. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.

  • Mann, S. 2017. Focusing on arts, humanities to develop well-rounded physicians. Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC), 15 (Aug 15). https://www.aamc.org/news-insights/focusing-arts-humanities-develop-well-rounded-physicians. Accessed 12 Jan 2020.

  • Muchnic, S. 2013. Under the microscope. ARTnews 112 (3): 70–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, M.C., M.A. Hixon, K.D. Moore, and M.P. Nelson. 2010. Four cultures: New synergies for engaging society on climate change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8 (6): 329–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325 (5939): 419–422. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, B. 2015. Al Gore inspires ‘CO2,’ an opera; A physicist lectures on climate change with a string quartet. http://www.eenews.net/stories/1060019537. Accessed 13 Jan 2020.

  • Piff, P.K., M. Feinberg, P. Dietze, D.M. Stancato, and D. Keltner. 2015. Awe, the small self, and prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 108 (6): 883–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, J.M., J. Ring, and L. Duke. 2005. Visual thinking strategies: A new role for art in medical education. Family Medicine 37 (4): 250–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Root-Bernstein, R.S. 2003. Sensual chemistry: Aesthetics as a motivation for research. HYLE 9: 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P. 1959. The two cultures and the scientific revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, C. and G. O’Connor. 2017. When artists get involved in research, science benefits. The Conversation (Aug. 16, 2017). theconversation.com/when-artistsget-involved-in-research-science-benefits-82147. Accessed February 21, 2018.

  • Swanson, F.J. 2015. Confluence of arts, humanities, and science at sites of long-term ecological inquiry. Ecosphere 6 (8): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, F.J., C. Goodrich, and K.D. Moore. 2008. Bridging boundaries: Scientists, creative writers, and the long view of the forest. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1890/070076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., H. Turunen, and T. Bondas. 2013. Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing and Health Sciences 15 (3): 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. 1999. Consilience: The Unity of knowledge. In New York. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Clarisse Hart (HFR), Cora Johnston (VCR), and Elizabeth Dodd (KNZ) for their assistance in preparing the highlights from their programs and our editors Sharon Kingsland and Robert Waide for valuable feedback throughout the writing process. The Andrews Forest Reflections program gratefully acknowledges support of the Shotpouch Foundation, Pacific Northwest Research Station of the USDA Forest Service, and NSF LTER (grant 14-40409). The In a Time of Change program (BNZ) thanks NSF LTER (grant DEB-1636476), the USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station (RJVA-PNW-01-JV-11261952-231), and NSF DEB-1257424 for support of its activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mary Beth Leigh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Leigh, M.B., Nelson, M.P., Goralnik, L., Swanson, F.J. (2021). Integration of the Arts and Humanities with Environmental Science in the LTER Network. In: Waide, R.B., Kingsland, S.E. (eds) The Challenges of Long Term Ecological Research: A Historical Analysis. Archimedes, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66933-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66933-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-66932-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-66933-1

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics